How Platform Exchange and Safeguards Matter: The Case of Sexual Risk in Airbnb and Couchsurfing

Overview

• This research paper examines how the design of network hospitality platforms, such as Airbnb and Couchsurfing, can shape user experiences and relational outcomes.
• The study focuses on the differences in risk factors that emerge based on the type of exchange facilitated by these platforms, particularly the risk of sexual violence.
• The researchers interviewed 40 female users who had experience with both Airbnb and Couchsurfing to understand how the platform design affects their perceptions of safety and precarity.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper explores how the design of online platforms for sharing accommodation, like Airbnb and Couchsurfing, can impact the experiences of users and the relationships they form. The researchers were particularly interested in how the type of exchange facilitated by these platforms - whether it's a negotiated transaction or a reciprocal arrangement - can lead to different types of risks, especially the risk of sexual violence.

To understand this, the researchers interviewed 40 women who had used both Airbnb and Couchsurfing. Airbnb is a platform where users can rent out their homes or rooms to guests, while Couchsurfing is a platform where people offer their couches or spare rooms to travelers for free, in a more reciprocal arrangement.

The researchers found that Airbnb's design, which frames the interaction as a business transaction between a host and a guest, helps to reduce sexual risk in a few ways. First, it casts the initial host-guest relationship as a buyer-seller arrangement, which sets clearer boundaries. Second, it stabilizes the expected scripts and behaviors during the interaction. Third, it formalizes the process for reporting and seeking recourse in case of sexual violence.

In contrast, Couchsurfing's focus on a more reciprocal, social exchange and lack of similar safeguards increases the sexual precarity for users, both on and off the platform. This suggests that even platforms with strong prosocial motivations, like Couchsurfing, can inadvertently jeopardize the very sociality they aim to foster.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a comparative analysis of two prominent network hospitality platforms - Airbnb, which facilitates negotiated exchange, and Couchsurfing, which facilitates reciprocal exchange. They focused on the issue of sexual risk, an underexplored form of platform danger, and drew on in-depth interviews with 40 female users who had experience with both platforms.

The study found that Airbnb's provision of binding negotiated exchange and institutional safeguards reduces sexual risk through three key mechanisms:

1. Casting the initial guest-host relation into a buyer-seller arrangement, which sets clearer boundaries and expectations.
2. Stabilizing the interactional scripts and behaviors during the exchange.
3. Formalizing the process for reporting and seeking recourse in cases of sexual violence.

In contrast, Couchsurfing's emphasis on reciprocal exchange and lack of similar safeguards increased the sexual precarity for users both on and off the platform. This suggests that even platforms with strong prosocial motivations can inadvertently jeopardize the very sociality they aim to foster.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into how the design of network hospitality platforms can shape user experiences and relational outcomes, particularly around issues of sexual risk. The researchers' focus on the distinct exchange models facilitated by Airbnb and Couchsurfing, and the corresponding differences in sexual precarity, is a novel and important contribution to the literature on platform vulnerabilities.

However, the study does have some limitations. The sample size of 40 female users, while providing rich qualitative data, may not be fully representative of the broader user populations of these platforms. Additionally, the study does not delve into the intersectional factors, such as race, class, or sexuality, that may further shape the experiences and perceptions of sexual risk among platform users.

Future research could explore the experiences of more diverse user groups, as well as investigate the role of platform design in mediating other forms of risk, such as financial or reputational harms. There is also scope to examine how users navigate and resist the constraints imposed by platform architectures, and to consider more participatory approaches to platform design that center the needs of vulnerable user populations.

Conclusion

This research paper sheds light on the complex relationship between platform design and user experiences, particularly around issues of sexual risk. By comparing the negotiated exchange model of Airbnb and the reciprocal exchange model of Couchsurfing, the study demonstrates how platform affordances can either mitigate or exacerbate the vulnerabilities faced by users, even in ostensibly "prosocial" sharing economy contexts.

The findings have important implications for platform designers and policymakers seeking to promote more equitable and safer online spaces. They underscore the need to carefully consider the relational dynamics and potential harms that can arise from different platform architectures, and to center the needs of marginalized user populations in the design process.