Rideshare Transparency: Translating Gig Worker Insights on AI Platform Design to Policy

Read original: arXiv:2406.10768 - Published 6/21/2024 by Varun Nagaraj Rao, Samantha Dalal, Eesha Agarwal, Dana Calacci, Andr'es Monroy-Hern'andez
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the importance of enhancing transparency and explainability in AI systems, particularly in the context of driver interviews and Reddit data analysis.
  • The authors present a thematic analysis map that provides an overview of their findings from this research.
  • The paper highlights the need for greater transparency and clarity in how AI systems make decisions, as well as the impact this can have on end-users and stakeholders.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the importance of making AI systems more transparent and easier to understand. The researchers looked at interviews with people who drive cars and data from the Reddit online forum to better understand this issue.

They created a visual "map" that summarizes the key themes they found through their analysis. This map shows that a lack of clear information about how AI systems work can be harmful - for example, it can make it difficult for people to do their jobs effectively.

The researchers argue that improving the transparency and explainability of AI is crucial, so that people can better understand and trust these systems. This is especially important in sensitive areas like self-driving cars or recommendation algorithms, where the decisions made by AI can have significant impacts on people's lives.

By making AI more transparent and easy to understand, the researchers believe it will be easier for people to use these systems effectively and have confidence in the decisions they make. This could lead to better outcomes for both the developers of AI systems and the people who rely on them.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a thematic analysis map that summarizes the key findings from a study examining the need for enhanced transparency and explainability in AI systems. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with drivers and analyzed discussions on the Reddit online forum to gain insights into stakeholder perspectives and concerns.

The thematic analysis map organizes the findings into several high-level themes, such as the "Harm: Lack of desired information for doing work" and the "Need for Explainability and Transparency." These themes highlight how a lack of transparency in AI decision-making can negatively impact end-users, creating challenges in their ability to understand and effectively use the systems.

The researchers also identified themes around the "Importance of Context" and the "Need for Accountability," emphasizing that transparency efforts must consider the specific use case and context of the AI system, as well as the need for clear lines of responsibility and oversight.

Overall, the thematic analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the key issues and considerations surrounding the need for greater transparency and explainability in AI systems, as evidenced by empirical research on stakeholder perceptions and needs. This work contributes to the broader understanding of how to design more transparent and trustworthy AI systems that can better serve the needs of various stakeholders, including end-users and the general public.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable and comprehensive analysis of the need for enhanced transparency and explainability in AI systems, drawing on empirical data from driver interviews and Reddit discussions. The thematic analysis map offers a clear and concise overview of the key issues, which can help guide the development of more transparent and user-friendly AI systems.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific technical challenges or solutions for achieving greater transparency and explainability. While the themes identified are important, the paper could have benefited from a more detailed discussion of the practical approaches and trade-offs involved in designing transparent AI systems, such as the balance between transparency and privacy or the challenges of explaining complex machine learning models.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the diverse perspectives and needs of different stakeholder groups in more depth, as the requirements and concerns of end-users, developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders may vary significantly. A more nuanced understanding of these different viewpoints could strengthen the paper's recommendations and implications.

Overall, the thematic analysis map provides a valuable starting point for understanding the importance of transparency and explainability in AI, but further research and discussion are needed to address the complex technical and societal challenges involved in realizing these goals.

Conclusion

This research paper highlights the critical need for enhancing transparency and explainability in AI systems, as evidenced by the perspectives and concerns of drivers and Reddit users. The thematic analysis map offers a comprehensive overview of the key issues, including the harms caused by a lack of desired information, the importance of context, and the need for accountability.

By addressing these challenges and designing more transparent and explainable AI systems, the researchers argue that it will be easier for end-users to understand and effectively use these technologies, leading to better outcomes for all stakeholders. This work contributes to the broader efforts to build more trustworthy and responsible AI that can better serve the needs of society.

While the paper provides a solid foundation, further research is needed to address the technical and practical complexities involved in achieving greater transparency and explainability in AI. Continued collaboration between researchers, developers, and diverse stakeholder groups will be crucial in advancing this important area of study and shaping the future of AI-powered technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Rideshare Transparency: Translating Gig Worker Insights on AI Platform Design to Policy

Varun Nagaraj Rao, Samantha Dalal, Eesha Agarwal, Dana Calacci, Andr'es Monroy-Hern'andez

Rideshare platforms exert significant control over workers through algorithmic systems that can result in financial, emotional, and physical harm. What steps can platforms, designers, and practitioners take to mitigate these negative impacts and meet worker needs? In this paper, through a novel mixed methods study combining a LLM-based analysis of over 1 million comments posted to online platform worker communities with semi-structured interviews of workers, we thickly characterize transparency-related harms, mitigation strategies, and worker needs while validating and contextualizing our findings within the broader worker community. Our findings expose a transparency gap between existing platform designs and the information drivers need, particularly concerning promotions, fares, routes, and task allocation. Our analysis suggests that rideshare workers need key pieces of information, which we refer to as indicators, to make informed work decisions. These indicators include details about rides, driver statistics, algorithmic implementation details, and platform policy information. We argue that instead of relying on platforms to include such information in their designs, new regulations that require platforms to publish public transparency reports may be a more effective solution to improve worker well-being. We offer recommendations for implementing such a policy.

Read more

6/21/2024

Evaluating Fairness in Black-box Algorithmic Markets: A Case Study of Ride Sharing in Chicago
Total Score

0

Evaluating Fairness in Black-box Algorithmic Markets: A Case Study of Ride Sharing in Chicago

Yuhan Liu, Yuhan Zheng, Siyuan Zhang, Lydia T. Liu

This study examines fairness within the rideshare industry, focusing on both drivers' wages and riders' trip fares. Through quantitative analysis, we found that drivers' hourly wages are significantly influenced by factors such as race/ethnicity, health insurance status, tenure to the platform, and working hours. Despite platforms' policies not intentionally embedding biases, disparities persist based on these characteristics. For ride fares, we propose a method to audit the pricing policy of a proprietary algorithm by replicating it; we conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the predicted rideshare fare is greater than the taxi fare, taking into account the approximation error in the replicated model. Challenges in accessing data and transparency hinder our ability to isolate discrimination from other factors, underscoring the need for collaboration with rideshare platforms and drivers to enhance fairness in algorithmic wage determination and pricing.

Read more

7/31/2024

Long-term Fairness in Ride-Hailing Platform
Total Score

0

Long-term Fairness in Ride-Hailing Platform

Yufan Kang, Jeffrey Chan, Wei Shao, Flora D. Salim, Christopher Leckie

Matching in two-sided markets such as ride-hailing has recently received significant attention. However, existing studies on ride-hailing mainly focus on optimising efficiency, and fairness issues in ride-hailing have been neglected. Fairness issues in ride-hailing, including significant earning differences between drivers and variance of passenger waiting times among different locations, have potential impacts on economic and ethical aspects. The recent studies that focus on fairness in ride-hailing exploit traditional optimisation methods and the Markov Decision Process to balance efficiency and fairness. However, there are several issues in these existing studies, such as myopic short-term decision-making from traditional optimisation and instability of fairness in a comparably longer horizon from both traditional optimisation and Markov Decision Process-based methods. To address these issues, we propose a dynamic Markov Decision Process model to alleviate fairness issues currently faced by ride-hailing, and seek a balance between efficiency and fairness, with two distinct characteristics: (i) a prediction module to predict the number of requests that will be raised in the future from different locations to allow the proposed method to consider long-term fairness based on the whole timeline instead of consider fairness only based on historical and current data patterns; (ii) a customised scalarisation function for multi-objective multi-agent Q Learning that aims to balance efficiency and fairness. Extensive experiments on a publicly available real-world dataset demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

7/26/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Legal Aspects of Decentralized and Platform-Driven Economies

Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, Toshiyuki Kono, Shinto Teramoto

The sharing economy is sprawling across almost every sector and activity around the world. About a decade ago, there were only a handful of platform driven companies operating on the market. Zipcar, BlaBlaCar and Couchsurfing among them. Then Airbnb and Uber revolutionized the transportation and hospitality industries with a presence in virtually every major city. Access over ownership is the paradigm shift from the traditional business model that grants individuals the use of products or services without the necessity of buying them. Digital platforms, data and algorithm-driven companies as well as decentralized blockchain technologies have tremendous potential. But they are also changing the rules of the game. One of such technologies challenging the legal system are AI systems that will also reshape the current legal framework concerning the liability of operators, users and manufacturers. Therefore, this introductory chapter deals with explaining and describing the legal issues of some of these disruptive technologies. The chapter argues for a more forward-thinking and flexible regulatory structure.

Read more

7/31/2024