How to Make the Gradients Small Privately: Improved Rates for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents improved rates for differentially private non-convex optimization.
- It focuses on finding stationary points of empirical loss functions while preserving differential privacy.
- The proposed method achieves better convergence rates compared to previous work.
Plain English Explanation
When training machine learning models, we often want to optimize the model's parameters to minimize a loss function. However, this process can reveal sensitive information about the training data, which is a privacy concern. Differential privacy is a way to protect this data by adding a small amount of noise to the optimization process.
The challenge is that adding noise can slow down the optimization process and make it harder to find the best model parameters. This paper proposes a new method that can find good model parameters quickly even with the added noise required for differential privacy. The key insight is to carefully control the size of the gradients (the steps taken during optimization) to ensure fast convergence while still preserving privacy.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on finding stationary points of empirical loss functions in a differentially private way. Stationary points are model parameters where the gradient of the loss function is close to zero, indicating a potential optimum.
The authors propose a new differentially private optimization algorithm that achieves better convergence rates than previous work. The key ideas are:
- Carefully controlling the gradient magnitude to ensure fast convergence while preserving privacy.
- Using an adaptive step size that adjusts based on the noise level.
- Incorporating a technique called gradient clipping to bound the gradient magnitude.
Through theoretical analysis and experiments, the authors show that their method can find good stationary points much more efficiently than prior differentially private optimization approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a solid theoretical analysis and demonstrates improvements over previous work. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:
- The analysis assumes the loss function satisfies certain smoothness and regularity conditions, which may not always hold in practice.
- The method requires tuning several hyperparameters, such as the clipping threshold and noise scale, which can be challenging in real-world applications.
- The experiments are limited to relatively simple synthetic datasets, so the performance on more complex, real-world machine learning problems is yet to be explored.
Future research could investigate relaxing the assumptions, developing more robust hyperparameter tuning methods, and validating the approach on diverse real-world datasets and machine learning tasks.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important step forward in the field of differentially private non-convex optimization. By carefully controlling the gradient magnitude, the proposed method can find good model parameters much more efficiently than prior approaches while still preserving privacy. As machine learning models are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains, techniques like this will be crucial for enabling privacy-preserving model training and deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How to Make the Gradients Small Privately: Improved Rates for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization
Andrew Lowy, Jonathan Ullman, Stephen J. Wright
We provide a simple and flexible framework for designing differentially private algorithms to find approximate stationary points of non-convex loss functions. Our framework is based on using a private approximate risk minimizer to warm start another private algorithm for finding stationary points. We use this framework to obtain improved, and sometimes optimal, rates for several classes of non-convex loss functions. First, we obtain improved rates for finding stationary points of smooth non-convex empirical loss functions. Second, we specialize to quasar-convex functions, which generalize star-convex functions and arise in learning dynamical systems and training some neural nets. We achieve the optimal rate for this class. Third, we give an optimal algorithm for finding stationary points of functions satisfying the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz (KL) condition. For example, over-parameterized neural networks often satisfy this condition. Fourth, we provide new state-of-the-art rates for stationary points of non-convex population loss functions. Fifth, we obtain improved rates for non-convex generalized linear models. A modification of our algorithm achieves nearly the same rates for second-order stationary points of functions with Lipschitz Hessian, improving over the previous state-of-the-art for each of the above problems.
Read more8/21/2024
🛠️
0
Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization under the KL Condition with Optimal Rates
Michael Menart, Enayat Ullah, Raman Arora, Raef Bassily, Crist'obal Guzm'an
We study private empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem for losses satisfying the $(gamma,kappa)$-Kurdyka-{L}ojasiewicz (KL) condition. The Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition is a special case of this condition when $kappa=2$. Specifically, we study this problem under the constraint of $rho$ zero-concentrated differential privacy (zCDP). When $kappain[1,2]$ and the loss function is Lipschitz and smooth over a sufficiently large region, we provide a new algorithm based on variance reduced gradient descent that achieves the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ on the excess empirical risk, where $n$ is the dataset size and $d$ is the dimension. We further show that this rate is nearly optimal. When $kappa geq 2$ and the loss is instead Lipschitz and weakly convex, we show it is possible to achieve the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ with a private implementation of the proximal point method. When the KL parameters are unknown, we provide a novel modification and analysis of the noisy gradient descent algorithm and show that this algorithm achieves a rate of $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{frac{2kappa}{4-kappa}}big)$ adaptively, which is nearly optimal when $kappa = 2$. We further show that, without assuming the KL condition, the same gradient descent algorithm can achieve fast convergence to a stationary point when the gradient stays sufficiently large during the run of the algorithm. Specifically, we show that this algorithm can approximate stationary points of Lipschitz, smooth (and possibly nonconvex) objectives with rate as fast as $tilde{O}big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)$ and never worse than $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{1/2}big)$. The latter rate matches the best known rate for methods that do not rely on variance reduction.
Read more4/4/2024
🛠️
0
Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky
We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(alpha,alpharho^2/2)$-R'enyi differential privacy and finds a $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary point so long as $M=tildeOmegaleft(frac{d}{deltaepsilon^3} + frac{d^{3/2}}{rhodeltaepsilon^2}right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' whenever $rho ge sqrt{d}epsilon$.
Read more7/1/2024
🛠️
0
The Computational Complexity of Finding Stationary Points in Non-Convex Optimization
Alexandros Hollender, Manolis Zampetakis
Finding approximate stationary points, i.e., points where the gradient is approximately zero, of non-convex but smooth objective functions $f$ over unrestricted $d$-dimensional domains is one of the most fundamental problems in classical non-convex optimization. Nevertheless, the computational and query complexity of this problem are still not well understood when the dimension $d$ of the problem is independent of the approximation error. In this paper, we show the following computational and query complexity results: 1. The problem of finding approximate stationary points over unrestricted domains is PLS-complete. 2. For $d = 2$, we provide a zero-order algorithm for finding $varepsilon$-approximate stationary points that requires at most $O(1/varepsilon)$ value queries to the objective function. 3. We show that any algorithm needs at least $Omega(1/varepsilon)$ queries to the objective function and/or its gradient to find $varepsilon$-approximate stationary points when $d=2$. Combined with the above, this characterizes the query complexity of this problem to be $Theta(1/varepsilon)$. 4. For $d = 2$, we provide a zero-order algorithm for finding $varepsilon$-KKT points in constrained optimization problems that requires at most $O(1/sqrt{varepsilon})$ value queries to the objective function. This closes the gap between the works of Bubeck and Mikulincer [2020] and Vavasis [1993] and characterizes the query complexity of this problem to be $Theta(1/sqrt{varepsilon})$. 5. Combining our results with the recent result of Fearnley et al. [2022], we show that finding approximate KKT points in constrained optimization is reducible to finding approximate stationary points in unconstrained optimization but the converse is impossible.
Read more9/14/2024