HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability

Overview

• The paper proposes a system called HuLLMI (Human vs. LLM Identification with Explainability) to distinguish human-written text from that generated by large language models (LLMs).
• HuLLMI aims to provide explainability by highlighting the key features that differentiate human and LLM-generated text.
• The system is evaluated on a diverse dataset and shown to outperform existing approaches in identifying the source of text.

Plain English Explanation

The rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) has led to concerns about the potential for these AI systems to generate text that is indistinguishable from human-written content. This poses challenges for tasks like content moderation, academic integrity, and effective communication.

The researchers behind HuLLMI have developed a system that can reliably identify whether a given piece of text was written by a human or generated by an LLM. Importantly, HuLLMI also provides explanations for its decisions, highlighting the key features that led it to classify the text as human or machine-generated.

By understanding the differences between human and LLM-generated text, we can better protect against the misuse of these powerful AI technologies and ensure the integrity of written communication. The researchers demonstrate that HuLLMI outperforms existing approaches, making it a promising tool for a variety of applications.

Technical Explanation

The HuLLMI system uses a multi-task learning approach to classify text as human or LLM-generated, while also learning to explain its decisions. The model is trained on a diverse dataset that includes a wide range of human-written text and text generated by various LLMs.

The key architectural components of HuLLMI include:

• Text Encoder: A transformer-based language model that encodes the input text into a meaningful representation.
• Classification Head: A neural network module that takes the encoded text and predicts whether it was written by a human or an LLM.
• Explainability Module: A separate neural network component that analyzes the encoded text and generates explanations for the classification decision.

During training, the model learns to balance the objectives of accurate classification and providing meaningful explanations. The researchers evaluate HuLLMI on a range of test sets and demonstrate its superior performance compared to existing approaches in identifying the source of text.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several limitations of the HuLLMI system, including the potential for biases in the training data and the challenge of evaluating the quality of the generated explanations. Additionally, the researchers note that the system may struggle to generalize to text that deviates significantly from the training distribution.

While the results are promising, further research is needed to address these limitations and to explore the broader implications of this technology. Ethical considerations, such as the potential for misuse in surveillance or content manipulation, should also be carefully considered.

Conclusion

The HuLLMI system represents an important step forward in the challenge of distinguishing human-written text from LLM-generated content. By providing both accurate classification and meaningful explanations, the system offers a valuable tool for preserving the integrity of written communication and mitigating the risks associated with the proliferation of AI-generated text.

As LLMs continue to advance, the need for robust and transparent systems like HuLLMI will only become more pressing. This research highlights the potential for explainable AI (XAI) to address critical challenges at the intersection of language, technology, and society.