LLMs for XAI: Future Directions for Explaining Explanations

2405.06064

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/13/2024 by Alexandra Zytek, Sara Pid`o, Kalyan Veeramachaneni

🔄

Abstract

In response to the demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), we investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform ML explanations into natural, human-readable narratives. Rather than directly explaining ML models using LLMs, we focus on refining explanations computed using existing XAI algorithms. We outline several research directions, including defining evaluation metrics, prompt design, comparing LLM models, exploring further training methods, and integrating external data. Initial experiments and user study suggest that LLMs offer a promising way to enhance the interpretability and usability of XAI.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the future directions for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) using large language models (LLMs).
  • It explores the challenges of explaining the explanations provided by LLMs and proposes research directions to address these challenges.
  • The paper aims to guide the development of more transparent and trustworthy AI systems.

Plain English Explanation

As AI systems become more advanced, it's crucial that we can understand how they make decisions. This is where explainable AI (XAI) comes in - it's the field of making AI models more transparent and interpretable. The paper focuses on using large language models (LLMs), which are AI models trained on massive amounts of text data, for XAI.

One key challenge is that even though LLMs can provide explanations for their decisions, these explanations can be hard to understand or may not fully capture the model's reasoning. The paper suggests several ways to address this, such as exploring how LLMs work under the hood and developing new techniques to make the explanations more interpretable.

The paper also discusses the importance of involving users in the explanation process and exploring how humans understand and interact with AI explanations. By understanding users' needs and preferences, researchers can create XAI systems that are more useful and trustworthy.

Overall, the paper lays out a roadmap for improving XAI with LLMs, which could lead to AI systems that are more transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes several research directions to address the challenges of explaining the explanations provided by large language models (LLMs) for explainable AI (XAI):

  1. Uncovering the Internal Workings of LLMs: The paper suggests exploring techniques to understand how LLMs work under the hood, such as analyzing their internal representations and decision-making processes. This could provide insights into the reasoning behind the explanations generated by LLMs.

  2. Developing Interpretable Explanations: The paper calls for research into new methods to make the explanations provided by LLMs more interpretable and accessible to users. This could involve techniques like natural language generation, concept induction, and visual explanation.

  3. Incorporating User Feedback: The paper emphasizes the importance of involving users in the explanation process and understanding their needs and preferences. This could help ensure that the explanations generated by LLMs are meaningful and useful to the people who rely on them.

  4. Exploring Human-AI Interaction: The paper suggests investigating how humans understand and interact with the explanations provided by AI systems, including their ability to detect and understand errors or limitations in the explanations.

By addressing these research directions, the paper aims to guide the development of more transparent, trustworthy, and user-centric XAI systems that leverage the power of large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-reasoned and comprehensive set of research directions for improving the explanations provided by large language models (LLMs) in the context of explainable AI (XAI). The authors acknowledge the inherent complexity of LLMs and the challenges in making their inner workings and decision-making processes more interpretable.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the specific technical approaches or methodologies that could be used to address the proposed research directions. While the paper provides a high-level overview, more detailed discussion of potential solutions and their feasibility could have been included.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical and societal implications of developing more transparent and explainable AI systems. As AI systems become more integral to decision-making processes, it will be crucial to consider the impact on issues such as privacy, bias, and accountability.

Further research could also explore the generalizability of the proposed approaches across different domains and application areas, as the needs and constraints for XAI may vary depending on the specific context.

Overall, the paper presents a compelling vision for advancing the field of XAI using LLMs and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

The paper outlines a set of research directions to address the challenge of explaining the explanations provided by large language models (LLMs) in the context of explainable AI (XAI). By focusing on uncovering the internal workings of LLMs, developing more interpretable explanations, incorporating user feedback, and exploring human-AI interaction, the authors aim to guide the development of more transparent, trustworthy, and user-centric AI systems.

The proposed research directions have the potential to significantly improve the interpretability and trustworthiness of AI decision-making, which is crucial as these systems become more integrated into our daily lives and critical decision-making processes. Addressing these challenges could lead to AI systems that are better aligned with human values and more accountable to the individuals and communities they serve.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔍

Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementation

Yacine Izza, Xuanxiang Huang, Antonio Morgado, Jordi Planes, Alexey Ignatiev, Joao Marques-Silva

YC

0

Reddit

0

The uses of machine learning (ML) have snowballed in recent years. In many cases, ML models are highly complex, and their operation is beyond the understanding of human decision-makers. Nevertheless, some uses of ML models involve high-stakes and safety-critical applications. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to help human decision-makers in understanding the operation of such complex ML models, thus eliciting trust in their operation. Unfortunately, the majority of past XAI work is based on informal approaches, that offer no guarantees of rigor. Unsurprisingly, there exists comprehensive experimental and theoretical evidence confirming that informal methods of XAI can provide human-decision makers with erroneous information. Logic-based XAI represents a rigorous approach to explainability; it is model-based and offers the strongest guarantees of rigor of computed explanations. However, a well-known drawback of logic-based XAI is the complexity of logic reasoning, especially for highly complex ML models. Recent work proposed distance-restricted explanations, i.e. explanations that are rigorous provided the distance to a given input is small enough. Distance-restricted explainability is tightly related with adversarial robustness, and it has been shown to scale for moderately complex ML models, but the number of inputs still represents a key limiting factor. This paper investigates novel algorithms for scaling up the performance of logic-based explainers when computing and enumerating ML model explanations with a large number of inputs.

Read more

5/15/2024

Concept Induction using LLMs: a user experiment for assessment

Concept Induction using LLMs: a user experiment for assessment

Adrita Barua, Cara Widmer, Pascal Hitzler

YC

0

Reddit

0

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) poses a significant challenge in providing transparent and understandable insights into complex AI models. Traditional post-hoc algorithms, while useful, often struggle to deliver interpretable explanations. Concept-based models offer a promising avenue by incorporating explicit representations of concepts to enhance interpretability. However, existing research on automatic concept discovery methods is often limited by lower-level concepts, costly human annotation requirements, and a restricted domain of background knowledge. In this study, we explore the potential of a Large Language Model (LLM), specifically GPT-4, by leveraging its domain knowledge and common-sense capability to generate high-level concepts that are meaningful as explanations for humans, for a specific setting of image classification. We use minimal textual object information available in the data via prompting to facilitate this process. To evaluate the output, we compare the concepts generated by the LLM with two other methods: concepts generated by humans and the ECII heuristic concept induction system. Since there is no established metric to determine the human understandability of concepts, we conducted a human study to assess the effectiveness of the LLM-generated concepts. Our findings indicate that while human-generated explanations remain superior, concepts derived from GPT-4 are more comprehensible to humans compared to those generated by ECII.

Read more

4/19/2024

💬

Towards Uncovering How Large Language Model Works: An Explainability Perspective

Haiyan Zhao, Fan Yang, Bo Shen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Mengnan Du

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have led to breakthroughs in language tasks, yet the internal mechanisms that enable their remarkable generalization and reasoning abilities remain opaque. This lack of transparency presents challenges such as hallucinations, toxicity, and misalignment with human values, hindering the safe and beneficial deployment of LLMs. This paper aims to uncover the mechanisms underlying LLM functionality through the lens of explainability. First, we review how knowledge is architecturally composed within LLMs and encoded in their internal parameters via mechanistic interpretability techniques. Then, we summarize how knowledge is embedded in LLM representations by leveraging probing techniques and representation engineering. Additionally, we investigate the training dynamics through a mechanistic perspective to explain phenomena such as grokking and memorization. Lastly, we explore how the insights gained from these explanations can enhance LLM performance through model editing, improve efficiency through pruning, and better align with human values.

Read more

4/17/2024

🤔

Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future

Joao Marques-Silva

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. However,the adoption of AI/ML is also a cause of grave concern. The operation of the most advances AI/ML models is often beyond the grasp of human decision makers. As a result, decisions that impact humans may not be understood and may lack rigorous validation. Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by ML models. As a result, XAI is a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Despite its strategic importance, most work on XAI lacks rigor, and so its use in high-risk or safety-critical domains serves to foster distrust instead of contributing to build much-needed trust. Logic-based XAI has recently emerged as a rigorous alternative to those other non-rigorous methods of XAI. This paper provides a technical survey of logic-based XAI, its origins, the current topics of research, and emerging future topics of research. The paper also highlights the many myths that pervade non-rigorous approaches for XAI.

Read more

6/19/2024