Human-like Linguistic Biases in Neural Speech Models: Phonetic Categorization and Phonotactic Constraints in Wav2Vec2.0
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how a popular neural speech model, Wav2Vec2.0, exhibits human-like biases in phonetic categorization and phonotactic constraints.
- The researchers investigated how the model's internal representations and behavior reflect linguistic biases that are observed in human speech perception and production.
- The findings suggest that neural speech models can learn and exhibit some of the same biases and constraints that shape human language processing.
Plain English Explanation
This research looked at how a speech recognition model called Wav2Vec2.0 behaves in ways that are similar to how humans process speech. The paper "Perception of Phonological Assimilation by Neural Speech Recognition" explored related topics.
The researchers wanted to see if the speech model has learned some of the same biases and "rules" that humans have when it comes to how we categorize speech sounds and put them together into words. For example, humans have a hard time hearing certain sound combinations that don't occur in their native language, even though they are physically capable of producing those sounds.
The study found that the Wav2Vec2.0 model shows similar biases and constraints as humans when it comes to processing speech. This suggests that as these models become more advanced, they are starting to mimic some of the same complex linguistic patterns that shape human language. The paper "Enhancing Child Vocalization Classification with Phonetically Tuned Embeddings" explored related ideas about modeling human-like speech processing.
Overall, this research provides insights into how neural networks can learn to process language in ways that parallel human cognition, which could have implications for building more human-like speech technologies. The paper "Phonetic Enhanced Language Modeling for Text-to-Speech" discussed related applications of these ideas.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments to examine how the Wav2Vec2.0 speech model exhibits biases and constraints that are similar to those observed in human phonetic categorization and phonotactic processing.
For phonetic categorization, they tested the model's ability to distinguish between sound contrasts that are either easy or difficult for humans to perceive, based on factors like whether the sounds occur in the model's training data. The results showed the model exhibited patterns of categorical perception akin to humans.
To assess phonotactic constraints, the researchers analyzed the model's internal representations and behavior when presented with word-like sequences that violate common sound patterns in languages. They found the model displayed sensitivity to these phonotactic violations, similar to how humans have difficulty processing unnatural sound combinations.
These findings suggest that as neural speech models become more sophisticated, they can acquire linguistic biases and constraints that parallel those of the human speech processing system. The paper "Towards Objective and Interpretable Speech Disorder Assessment: A Comparative Study" discussed related work on modeling human-like speech processing.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides compelling evidence that neural speech models like Wav2Vec2.0 can exhibit human-like biases and constraints in their internal representations and behavior. This aligns with the growing body of research showing that advanced neural networks can learn to process language in ways that resemble human cognition.
However, the researchers acknowledge that the current study focused on a single model and a limited set of linguistic phenomena. More work is needed to fully characterize the extent and nature of these human-like biases across a wider range of speech models and linguistic properties. The paper "Predictive Learning Model Can Simulate Temporal Dynamics of Human Vocal Development" discussed related challenges in modeling human-like speech processing.
Additionally, it remains an open question as to what exactly drives the emergence of these human-like biases in neural speech models. The researchers speculate it may be related to the statistical regularities and constraints present in the training data, but further investigation is warranted.
Overall, this research contributes valuable insights into the linguistic capabilities of state-of-the-art speech models and highlights the potential for using such models to better understand human speech perception and production. Continued progress in this area could lead to more human-like and effective speech technologies.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that a popular neural speech model, Wav2Vec2.0, exhibits human-like biases and constraints in its internal representations and behavior related to phonetic categorization and phonotactic processing.
The findings suggest that as speech models become more advanced, they can acquire linguistic patterns that parallel those observed in human speech processing. This has implications for building more human-like and effective speech technologies, as well as for using these models as tools to further our understanding of the cognitive processes underlying human language.
Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the linguistic capabilities of modern neural speech models and the potential for them to model human-like speech perception and production.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Human-like Linguistic Biases in Neural Speech Models: Phonetic Categorization and Phonotactic Constraints in Wav2Vec2.0
Marianne de Heer Kloots, Willem Zuidema
What do deep neural speech models know about phonology? Existing work has examined the encoding of individual linguistic units such as phonemes in these models. Here we investigate interactions between units. Inspired by classic experiments on human speech perception, we study how Wav2Vec2 resolves phonotactic constraints. We synthesize sounds on an acoustic continuum between /l/ and /r/ and embed them in controlled contexts where only /l/, only /r/, or neither occur in English. Like humans, Wav2Vec2 models show a bias towards the phonotactically admissable category in processing such ambiguous sounds. Using simple measures to analyze model internals on the level of individual stimuli, we find that this bias emerges in early layers of the model's Transformer module. This effect is amplified by ASR finetuning but also present in fully self-supervised models. Our approach demonstrates how controlled stimulus designs can help localize specific linguistic knowledge in neural speech models.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Perception of Phonological Assimilation by Neural Speech Recognition Models
Charlotte Pouw, Marianne de Heer Kloots, Afra Alishahi, Willem Zuidema
Human listeners effortlessly compensate for phonological changes during speech perception, often unconsciously inferring the intended sounds. For example, listeners infer the underlying /n/ when hearing an utterance such as clea[m] pan, where [m] arises from place assimilation to the following labial [p]. This article explores how the neural speech recognition model Wav2Vec2 perceives assimilated sounds, and identifies the linguistic knowledge that is implemented by the model to compensate for assimilation during Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Using psycholinguistic stimuli, we systematically analyze how various linguistic context cues influence compensation patterns in the model's output. Complementing these behavioral experiments, our probing experiments indicate that the model shifts its interpretation of assimilated sounds from their acoustic form to their underlying form in its final layers. Finally, our causal intervention experiments suggest that the model relies on minimal phonological context cues to accomplish this shift. These findings represent a step towards better understanding the similarities and differences in phonological processing between neural ASR models and humans.
Read more6/24/2024
🏷️
0
Enhancing Child Vocalization Classification with Phonetically-Tuned Embeddings for Assisting Autism Diagnosis
Jialu Li, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, Karrie Karahalios
The assessment of children at risk of autism typically involves a clinician observing, taking notes, and rating children's behaviors. A machine learning model that can label adult and child audio may largely save labor in coding children's behaviors, helping clinicians capture critical events and better communicate with parents. In this study, we leverage Wav2Vec 2.0 (W2V2), pre-trained on 4300-hour of home audio of children under 5 years old, to build a unified system for tasks of clinician-child speaker diarization and vocalization classification (VC). To enhance children's VC, we build a W2V2 phoneme recognition system for children under 4 years old, and we incorporate its phonetically-tuned embeddings as auxiliary features or recognize pseudo phonetic transcripts as an auxiliary task. We test our method on two corpora (Rapid-ABC and BabbleCor) and obtain consistent improvements. Additionally, we outperform the state-of-the-art performance on the reproducible subset of BabbleCor. Code available at https://huggingface.co/lijialudew
Read more6/7/2024
0
A layer-wise analysis of Mandarin and English suprasegmentals in SSL speech models
Ant'on de la Fuente, Dan Jurafsky
This study asks how self-supervised speech models represent suprasegmental categories like Mandarin lexical tone, English lexical stress, and English phrasal accents. Through a series of probing tasks, we make layer-wise comparisons of English and Mandarin 12 layer monolingual models. Our findings suggest that 1) English and Mandarin wav2vec 2.0 models learn contextual representations of abstract suprasegmental categories which are strongest in the middle third of the network. 2) Models are better at representing features that exist in the language of their training data, and this difference is driven by enriched context in transformer blocks, not local acoustic representation. 3) Fine-tuned wav2vec 2.0 improves performance in later layers compared to pre-trained models mainly for lexically contrastive features like tone and stress, 4) HuBERT and WavLM learn similar representations to wav2vec 2.0, differing mainly in later layer performance. Our results extend previous understanding of how models represent suprasegmentals and offer new insights into the language-specificity and contextual nature of these representations.
Read more8/27/2024