A Human-Like Reasoning Framework for Multi-Phases Planning Task with Large Language Models
2405.18208
0
0
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted their proficiency in some simple tasks like writing and coding through various reasoning strategies. However, LLM agents still struggle with tasks that require comprehensive planning, a process that challenges current models and remains a critical research issue. In this study, we concentrate on travel planning, a Multi-Phases planning problem, that involves multiple interconnected stages, such as outlining, information gathering, and planning, often characterized by the need to manage various constraints and uncertainties. Existing reasoning approaches have struggled to effectively address this complex task. Our research aims to address this challenge by developing a human-like planning framework for LLM agents, i.e., guiding the LLM agent to simulate various steps that humans take when solving Multi-Phases problems. Specifically, we implement several strategies to enable LLM agents to generate a coherent outline for each travel query, mirroring human planning patterns. Additionally, we integrate Strategy Block and Knowledge Block into our framework: Strategy Block facilitates information collection, while Knowledge Block provides essential information for detailed planning. Through our extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our framework significantly improves the planning capabilities of LLM agents, enabling them to tackle the travel planning task with improved efficiency and effectiveness. Our experimental results showcase the exceptional performance of the proposed framework; when combined with GPT-4-Turbo, it attains $10times$ the performance gains in comparison to the baseline framework deployed on GPT-4-Turbo.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a human-like reasoning framework for solving multi-phase planning tasks using large language models (LLMs).
- The framework aims to mimic the way humans approach complex planning problems by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable sub-tasks.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a travel planning task, showing that it can outperform traditional planning algorithms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way of using large language models (LLMs) to solve complex planning problems. The key idea is to break down the problem into smaller, more manageable sub-tasks, just like how humans approach these kinds of problems.
For example, let's say you need to plan a trip. You might start by figuring out where you want to go and when, then research transportation options, book accommodations, and so on. The authors' framework mimics this step-by-step process, allowing the LLM to tackle the problem in a more human-like way.
By breaking the problem down into phases, the LLM can focus on one aspect at a time, rather than trying to solve the entire problem at once. This makes the task more tractable for the model and can lead to better overall results.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a travel planning task, showing that it can outperform traditional planning algorithms. This suggests that incorporating human-like reasoning strategies can be a powerful way to enhance the capabilities of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a human-like reasoning framework for multi-phase planning tasks with large language models. The key idea is to break down complex planning problems into a sequence of smaller, more manageable sub-tasks, similar to how humans approach such problems.
The framework consists of three main components:
- Task Decomposition: The problem is broken down into a set of sub-tasks, each with its own goals and constraints.
- Sub-task Solving: An LLM is used to solve each sub-task, leveraging its language understanding and generation capabilities.
- Plan Evaluation and Refinement: The solutions to the sub-tasks are evaluated, and the overall plan is refined if necessary.
The authors evaluate their approach on a travel planning task, where the goal is to plan an entire trip given a set of constraints (e.g., budget, time, interests). They show that their framework can outperform traditional planning algorithms, as it is better able to handle the complexity and ambiguity inherent in these types of problems.
This work builds on previous research on using large language models for planning-based reasoning and evaluating the development of planning-aware techniques. The authors also draw inspiration from work on learning planning-based reasoning by collecting trajectories and meta-task planning for language agents.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the proposed framework is that it relies on the LLM's ability to accurately solve each sub-task. If the model makes mistakes or fails to capture important nuances in the sub-tasks, the overall plan may not be optimal. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest further research on improving the sub-task solving capabilities of the LLM.
Additionally, the framework may struggle with highly complex or open-ended planning problems, where the number of sub-tasks and their interdependencies become difficult to manage. The authors' evaluation focuses on a relatively constrained travel planning task, and it remains to be seen how well the framework would scale to more challenging planning problems.
Another potential concern is the interpretability and transparency of the framework. As with many LLM-based systems, it may be challenging to understand the reasoning behind the model's decisions, which could limit its adoption in domains where explainability is crucial, such as critical decision-making.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel human-like reasoning framework for solving multi-phase planning tasks using large language models. By breaking down complex problems into smaller, more manageable sub-tasks, the framework is able to outperform traditional planning algorithms on a travel planning task.
The work represents an important step towards enhancing the planning capabilities of large language models, which could have wide-ranging applications in fields such as logistics, project management, and decision support. However, further research is needed to address the potential limitations of the framework, particularly around sub-task solving accuracy, scalability to more complex problems, and interpretability.
Overall, this paper demonstrates the value of incorporating human-like reasoning strategies into language model-based systems, and suggests promising avenues for future research in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Robust Planning with LLM-Modulo Framework: Case Study in Travel Planning
Atharva Gundawar, Mudit Verma, Lin Guan, Karthik Valmeekam, Siddhant Bhambri, Subbarao Kambhampati
0
0
As the applicability of Large Language Models (LLMs) extends beyond traditional text processing tasks, there is a burgeoning interest in their potential to excel in planning and reasoning assignments, realms traditionally reserved for System 2 cognitive competencies. Despite their perceived versatility, the research community is still unraveling effective strategies to harness these models in such complex domains. The recent discourse introduced by the paper on LLM Modulo marks a significant stride, proposing a conceptual framework that enhances the integration of LLMs into diverse planning and reasoning activities. This workshop paper delves into the practical application of this framework within the domain of travel planning, presenting a specific instance of its implementation. We are using the Travel Planning benchmark by the OSU NLP group, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of LLMs in producing valid itineraries based on user queries presented in natural language. While popular methods of enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs such as Chain of Thought, ReAct, and Reflexion achieve a meager 0%, 0.6%, and 0% with GPT3.5-Turbo respectively, our operationalization of the LLM-Modulo framework for TravelPlanning domain provides a remarkable improvement, enhancing baseline performances by 4.6x for GPT4-Turbo and even more for older models like GPT3.5-Turbo from 0% to 5%. Furthermore, we highlight the other useful roles of LLMs in the planning pipeline, as suggested in LLM-Modulo, which can be reliably operationalized such as extraction of useful critics and reformulator for critics.
6/3/2024
💬
Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan Reasoning
Fangru Lin, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann, Elle Michelle Yang, Anthony Cohn, Janet B. Pierrehumbert
0
0
Planning is a fundamental property of human intelligence. Reasoning about asynchronous plans is challenging since it requires sequential and parallel planning to optimize time costs. Can large language models (LLMs) succeed at this task? Here, we present the first large-scale study investigating this question. We find that a representative set of closed and open-source LLMs, including GPT-4 and LLaMA-2, behave poorly when not supplied with illustrations about the task-solving process in our benchmark AsyncHow. We propose a novel technique called Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) that combines graphs with natural language prompts and achieves state-of-the-art results. We show that although PLaG can boost model performance, LLMs still suffer from drastic degradation when task complexity increases, highlighting the limits of utilizing LLMs for simulating digital devices. We see our study as an exciting step towards using LLMs as efficient autonomous agents. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/fangru-lin/graph-llm-asynchow-plan.
6/4/2024
💬
Large Language Models Can Plan Your Travels Rigorously with Formal Verification Tools
Yilun Hao, Yongchao Chen, Yang Zhang, Chuchu Fan
0
0
The recent advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs), with their abundant world knowledge and capabilities of tool-using and reasoning, fostered many LLM planning algorithms. However, LLMs have not shown to be able to accurately solve complex combinatorial optimization problems. In Xie et al. (2024), the authors proposed TravelPlanner, a U.S. domestic travel planning benchmark, and showed that LLMs themselves cannot make travel plans that satisfy user requirements with a best success rate of 0.6%. In this work, we propose a framework that enables LLMs to formally formulate and solve the travel planning problem as a satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) problem and use SMT solvers interactively and automatically solve the combinatorial search problem. The SMT solvers guarantee the satisfiable of input constraints and the LLMs can enable a language-based interaction with our framework. When the input constraints cannot be satisfiable, our LLM-based framework will interactively offer suggestions to users to modify their travel requirements via automatic reasoning using the SMT solvers. We evaluate our framework with TravelPlanner and achieve a success rate of 97%. We also create a separate dataset that contain international travel benchmarks and use both dataset to evaluate the effectiveness of our interactive planning framework when the initial user queries cannot be satisfied. Our framework could generate valid plans with an average success rate of 78.6% for our dataset and 85.0% for TravelPlanner according to diverse humans preferences.
4/22/2024
💬
Plan of Thoughts: Heuristic-Guided Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Houjun Liu
0
0
While language models (LMs) offer significant capability in zero-shot reasoning tasks across a wide range of domains, they do not perform satisfactorily in problems which requires multi-step reasoning. Previous approaches to mitigate this involves breaking a larger, multi-step task into sub-tasks and asking the language model to generate proposals (thoughts) for each sub-task and using exhaustive planning approaches such as DFS to compose a solution. In this work, we leverage this idea to introduce two new contributions: first, we formalize a planning-based approach to perform multi-step problem solving with LMs via Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), with the LM's own reflections about the value of a state used as a search heuristic; second, leveraging the online POMDP solver POMCP, we demonstrate a superior success rate of 89.4% on the Game of 24 task as compared to existing approaches while also offering better anytime performance characteristics than fixed tree-search which is used previously. Taken together, these contributions allow modern LMs to decompose and solve larger-scale reasoning tasks more effectively.
5/1/2024