A Hybrid Intelligence Method for Argument Mining

Overview

• Large-scale survey tools allow collecting citizen feedback in opinion corpora.
• Extracting key arguments from a noisy set of opinions helps quickly and accurately understand the opinions.
• Fully automated methods can extract arguments but have limitations:
  1. Require large labeled datasets, which are costly to annotate.
  2. Work well for known viewpoints, but not for novel points of view.

Plain English Explanation

HyEnA: A Hybrid Approach for Extracting Arguments from Citizen Feedback

Collecting feedback from citizens is important for understanding their opinions on various issues. However, sifting through a large volume of opinionated text can be challenging. Fully automated methods can help extract the key arguments, but they have some drawbacks. They require extensive labeled datasets, which are expensive to create. They also work well for common viewpoints, but may struggle to capture novel perspectives.

To address these limitations, the researchers propose a hybrid approach that combines the speed of automation with the reasoning capabilities of humans. This approach, called HyEnA, allows for more comprehensive and accurate extraction of arguments from citizen feedback. The researchers evaluate HyEnA on three different datasets of citizen opinions and find that it outperforms a state-of-the-art automated method in terms of coverage and precision. At the same time, HyEnA requires less human effort compared to a fully manual expert analysis while maintaining the same level of quality.

Technical Explanation

The researchers present HyEnA, a hybrid (human + AI) method for extracting arguments from opinionated texts. The key components of HyEnA are:

1. Automated Argument Extraction: An initial automated step that uses a state-of-the-art argument mining model to identify potential arguments in the input text.

2. Human Refinement: A subsequent human review and refinement step, where annotators assess the automatically extracted arguments and provide corrections or additions.

3. Iterative Refinement: An iterative process where the human-refined arguments are used to retrain the automated model, improving its performance on the specific corpus.

The researchers evaluate HyEnA on three citizen feedback corpora and compare its performance to a fully automated approach. They find that HyEnA achieves higher coverage and precision than the automated method when evaluated against a common set of diverse opinions, demonstrating the value of human insight. At the same time, HyEnA requires less human effort than a fully manual expert analysis while maintaining the same level of quality.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work:

1. Scalability: While HyEnA requires less human effort than a fully manual approach, the human review and refinement step may still limit its scalability to very large corpora.

2. Domain Generalization: The performance of HyEnA may be dependent on the specific characteristics of the citizen feedback corpora used in the evaluation. Its effectiveness in other domains or for different types of opinionated text is not yet established.

3. Annotation Quality: The quality of the human-refined arguments in HyEnA relies on the expertise and diligence of the annotators. Ensuring consistent and high-quality annotations across multiple reviewers could be a challenge.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or limitations of the automated argument extraction model used as the initial step in HyEnA. The performance of this component could have a significant impact on the overall effectiveness of the hybrid approach.

Conclusion

The HyEnA method proposed in this paper demonstrates the potential benefits of combining human and artificial intelligence for extracting arguments from large-scale citizen feedback. By leveraging the strengths of both automated processing and human understanding, HyEnA can achieve higher coverage and precision than fully automated approaches while requiring less human effort than a fully manual analysis.

This research highlights the value of hybrid human-AI systems in making sense of complex and noisy opinionated data, which can have important implications for understanding public sentiment and informing policy decisions. As the volume of citizen feedback continues to grow, tools like HyEnA can play a crucial role in efficiently and effectively extracting the key arguments and insights from these large-scale opinion corpora.