Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts
2402.10958
0
0
Abstract
In the field of large language models (LLMs), aligning models with the diverse preferences of users is a critical challenge. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has played a key role in this area. It works by using pairs of preferences derived from the same prompts, and it functions without needing an additional reward model. However, DPO does not fully reflect the complex nature of human learning, which often involves understanding contrasting responses to not only identical but also similar questions. To overcome this shortfall, we propose Relative Preference Optimization (RPO). RPO is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts. It introduces a contrastive weighting mechanism, enabling the tuning of LLMs using a broader range of preference data, including both paired and unpaired sets. This approach expands the learning capabilities of the model, allowing it to leverage insights from a more varied set of prompts. Through empirical tests, including dialogue and summarization tasks, and evaluations using the AlpacaEval2.0 leaderboard, RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align LLMs with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process. Our code can be viewed at https://github.com/yinyueqin/relative-preference-optimization
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new technique called Relative Preference Optimization (ROPO) to enhance the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviors.
- ROPO aims to improve upon existing preference optimization methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), by leveraging contrasting responses across identical and diverse prompts.
- The key idea is to use relative preferences between model responses to better align the LLM with the intended behavior, rather than relying solely on direct preferences.
- The authors also introduce several variants of ROPO, including Robust Preference Optimization (ROPO-R), Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (ROPO-M), and Listwise Preference Optimization (LIPO), to address different alignment challenges.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a new method called Relative Preference Optimization (ROPO) to improve the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviors. The key idea is to use the relative preferences between the model's responses, rather than just the direct preferences, to better align the LLM with the intended behavior.
Imagine you're training an LLM to be a helpful assistant. Instead of just telling the model what the "perfect" response should be, ROPO compares the model's response to other possible responses and uses those relative comparisons to fine-tune the model. This helps the model learn not just what the ideal response is, but how it should compare to other possible responses.
The authors also introduce several variants of ROPO, each designed to address different alignment challenges. For example, ROPO-R focuses on making the optimization more robust, while ROPO-M allows the model to be aligned with multiple reference responses, and LIPO takes a listwise approach to preference optimization.
By using these relative preference techniques, the researchers aim to create LLMs that are better aligned with the desired behaviors, leading to more reliable and trustworthy AI assistants.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces Relative Preference Optimization (ROPO), a new technique for enhancing the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with desired behaviors. ROPO builds upon existing preference optimization methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), by leveraging contrasting responses across identical and diverse prompts.
The core idea of ROPO is to use relative preferences between model responses to better align the LLM with the intended behavior, rather than relying solely on direct preferences. This is achieved by presenting the model with multiple possible responses to the same prompt and then using the relative ranking of these responses to fine-tune the model.
The authors also introduce several variants of ROPO to address different alignment challenges:
- Robust Preference Optimization (ROPO-R): Focuses on making the optimization process more robust to potential noise or distributional shift in the preference data.
- Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (ROPO-M): Allows the model to be aligned with multiple reference responses, rather than just a single target.
- Listwise Preference Optimization (LIPO): Takes a listwise approach to preference optimization, where the model learns to rank the entire set of candidate responses, rather than just pairwise comparisons.
By incorporating these relative preference techniques, the researchers aim to create LLMs that are better aligned with the desired behaviors, leading to more reliable and trustworthy AI assistants.
Critical Analysis
The ROPO approach presented in the paper offers a promising direction for enhancing the alignment of large language models with desired behaviors. The use of relative preferences, rather than just direct preferences, is a novel and compelling idea that could help address some of the limitations of existing preference optimization methods.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of ROPO and its variants to other state-of-the-art alignment techniques, such as Iterated Amplification or Cooperative AI. It would be valuable to see how ROPO performs in a broader context and whether it offers significant improvements over other approaches.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential issues that may arise from the use of relative preferences, such as the risk of introducing biases or the difficulty of interpreting the model's reasoning when it is based on comparative judgments rather than direct evaluations.
Further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and tradeoffs of ROPO, as well as to explore ways to combine it with other alignment techniques for even more robust and reliable LLM behavior.
Conclusion
The Relative Preference Optimization (ROPO) technique introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to create large language models (LLMs) that are better aligned with desired behaviors. By leveraging relative preferences between model responses, ROPO and its variants aim to improve upon existing preference optimization methods and produce more trustworthy and reliable AI assistants.
While the paper presents a solid technical foundation for ROPO, further research is needed to fully understand its strengths, weaknesses, and potential synergies with other alignment approaches. As the field of AI safety and alignment continues to evolve, techniques like ROPO will play a crucial role in ensuring that the powerful capabilities of LLMs are harnessed for the benefit of humanity.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Diffusion-RPO: Aligning Diffusion Models through Relative Preference Optimization
Yi Gu, Zhendong Wang, Yueqin Yin, Yujia Xie, Mingyuan Zhou
0
0
Aligning large language models with human preferences has emerged as a critical focus in language modeling research. Yet, integrating preference learning into Text-to-Image (T2I) generative models is still relatively uncharted territory. The Diffusion-DPO technique made initial strides by employing pairwise preference learning in diffusion models tailored for specific text prompts. We introduce Diffusion-RPO, a new method designed to align diffusion-based T2I models with human preferences more effectively. This approach leverages both prompt-image pairs with identical prompts and those with semantically related content across various modalities. Furthermore, we have developed a new evaluation metric, style alignment, aimed at overcoming the challenges of high costs, low reproducibility, and limited interpretability prevalent in current evaluations of human preference alignment. Our findings demonstrate that Diffusion-RPO outperforms established methods such as Supervised Fine-Tuning and Diffusion-DPO in tuning Stable Diffusion versions 1.5 and XL-1.0, achieving superior results in both automated evaluations of human preferences and style alignment. Our code is available at https://github.com/yigu1008/Diffusion-RPO
6/11/2024
Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study
Shusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye, Weilin Liu, Zhiyu Mei, Guangju Wang, Chao Yu, Yi Wu
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is currently the most widely used method to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Existing RLHF methods can be roughly categorized as either reward-based or reward-free. Novel applications such as ChatGPT and Claude leverage reward-based methods that first learn a reward model and apply actor-critic algorithms, such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, in academic benchmarks, state-of-the-art results are often achieved via reward-free methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Is DPO truly superior to PPO? Why does PPO perform poorly on these benchmarks? In this paper, we first conduct both theoretical and empirical studies on the algorithmic properties of DPO and show that DPO may have fundamental limitations. Moreover, we also comprehensively examine PPO and reveal the key factors for the best performances of PPO in fine-tuning LLMs. Finally, we benchmark DPO and PPO across a collection of RLHF testbeds, ranging from dialogue to code generation. Experiment results demonstrate that PPO is able to surpass other alignment methods in all cases and achieve state-of-the-art results in challenging code competitions.
4/23/2024
Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement
Runsheng Yu, Yong Wang, Xiaoqi Jiao, Youzhi Zhang, James T. Kwok
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been commonly used to align the behaviors of Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences. Recently, a popular alternative is Direct Policy Optimization (DPO), which replaces an LLM-based reward model with the policy itself, thus obviating the need for extra memory and training time to learn the reward model. However, DPO does not consider the relative qualities of the positive and negative responses, and can lead to sub-optimal training outcomes. To alleviate this problem, we investigate the use of intrinsic knowledge within the on-the-fly fine-tuning LLM to obtain relative qualities and help to refine the loss function. Specifically, we leverage the knowledge of the LLM to design a refinement function to estimate the quality of both the positive and negative responses. We show that the constructed refinement function can help self-refine the loss function under mild assumptions. The refinement function is integrated into DPO and its variant Identity Policy Optimization (IPO). Experiments across various evaluators indicate that they can improve the performance of the fine-tuned models over DPO and IPO.
6/3/2024
Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
Afra Amini, Tim Vieira, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a successful fine-tuning strategy for aligning large language models with human preferences without the need to train a reward model or employ reinforcement learning. DPO, as originally formulated, relies on binary preference data and fine-tunes a language model to increase the likelihood of a preferred response over a dispreferred response. However, not all preference pairs are equal. Sometimes, the preferred response is only slightly better than the dispreferred one. In other cases, the preference is much stronger. For instance, if a response contains harmful or toxic content, the annotator will have a strong preference for that response. In this paper, we propose a generalization of DPO, termed DPO with an offset (ODPO), that does not treat every preference pair equally during fine-tuning. Intuitively, ODPO requires the difference between the likelihood of the preferred and dispreferred response to be greater than an offset value. The offset is determined based on the extent to which one response is preferred over another. Our experiments on various tasks suggest that ODPO significantly outperforms DPO in aligning language models, especially when the number of preference pairs is limited.
6/7/2024