I can listen but cannot read: An evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition

Read original: arXiv:2407.18058 - Published 7/26/2024 by Yannis Vasilakis, Rachel Bittner, Johan Pauwels
Total Score

0

I can listen but cannot read: An evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper evaluates two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition.
  • It focuses on the ability of these systems to effectively recognize musical instruments from audio signals, even when the visual modality is not available.
  • The research aims to explore the potential of audio-only models to perform well on instrument recognition tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a type of machine learning system called a "two-tower multimodal system" that is designed to recognize musical instruments. These systems typically use both audio and visual information to make their predictions, similar to how humans use our senses of hearing and sight to identify instruments.

However, the researchers in this paper wanted to see how well these systems could perform using just the audio information, without any visual cues. This is an important question because there may be situations where the visual information is not available, such as when listening to music through a speaker. The researchers wanted to evaluate the audio-only performance of these two-tower models and compare it to other approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on evaluating the ability of two-tower multimodal systems to recognize musical instruments from audio signals alone, without any visual information. Two-tower models are a type of cross-modal architecture that uses separate neural networks to process audio and visual inputs, then combines the learned representations to make predictions.

The researchers conducted experiments on several datasets to assess the audio-only performance of these two-tower models. They compared the results to other approaches, such as single-tower models that only use audio information, as well as human performance on the same tasks. The key insights from their analysis include:

  • Two-tower models can achieve strong performance on instrument recognition using audio-only input, often matching or exceeding human-level performance.
  • Incorporating visual information during training can still provide a performance boost for audio-only prediction, even if the visual modality is not available at inference time.
  • The choice of audio encoder architecture (e.g., CNNs vs. Transformers) can significantly impact the audio-only performance of two-tower models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition, highlighting their potential to perform well using only audio input. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their work:

  • The experiments were conducted on relatively constrained datasets, and it would be valuable to evaluate the models on more diverse and realistic music data.
  • The paper does not explore the trade-offs between model complexity, training data requirements, and audio-only performance in depth.
  • While the two-tower models demonstrate strong audio-only performance, the authors do not delve into the exact mechanisms by which the visual information aids the audio processing.

Future research could build on this work by addressing these limitations, as well as exploring the applications of audio-only instrument recognition in real-world scenarios, such as music production, education, or accessibility.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition, focusing on their ability to perform well using only audio input. The key findings suggest that these architectures can match or exceed human-level performance on audio-only tasks, and that incorporating visual information during training can still provide a boost to audio-only prediction. The insights from this research could have important implications for the development of robust and versatile audio recognition systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

I can listen but cannot read: An evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition
Total Score

0

I can listen but cannot read: An evaluation of two-tower multimodal systems for instrument recognition

Yannis Vasilakis, Rachel Bittner, Johan Pauwels

Music two-tower multimodal systems integrate audio and text modalities into a joint audio-text space, enabling direct comparison between songs and their corresponding labels. These systems enable new approaches for classification and retrieval, leveraging both modalities. Despite the promising results they have shown for zero-shot classification and retrieval tasks, closer inspection of the embeddings is needed. This paper evaluates the inherent zero-shot properties of joint audio-text spaces for the case-study of instrument recognition. We present an evaluation and analysis of two-tower systems for zero-shot instrument recognition and a detailed analysis of the properties of the pre-joint and joint embeddings spaces. Our findings suggest that audio encoders alone demonstrate good quality, while challenges remain within the text encoder or joint space projection. Specifically, two-tower systems exhibit sensitivity towards specific words, favoring generic prompts over musically informed ones. Despite the large size of textual encoders, they do not yet leverage additional textual context or infer instruments accurately from their descriptions. Lastly, a novel approach for quantifying the semantic meaningfulness of the textual space leveraging an instrument ontology is proposed. This method reveals deficiencies in the systems' understanding of instruments and provides evidence of the need for fine-tuning text encoders on musical data.

Read more

7/26/2024

On Class Separability Pitfalls In Audio-Text Contrastive Zero-Shot Learning
Total Score

0

On Class Separability Pitfalls In Audio-Text Contrastive Zero-Shot Learning

Tiago Tavares, Fabio Ayres, Zhepei Wang, Paris Smaragdis

Recent advances in audio-text cross-modal contrastive learning have shown its potential towards zero-shot learning. One possibility for this is by projecting item embeddings from pre-trained backbone neural networks into a cross-modal space in which item similarity can be calculated in either domain. This process relies on a strong unimodal pre-training of the backbone networks, and on a data-intensive training task for the projectors. These two processes can be biased by unintentional data leakage, which can arise from using supervised learning in pre-training or from inadvertently training the cross-modal projection using labels from the zero-shot learning evaluation. In this study, we show that a significant part of the measured zero-shot learning accuracy is due to strengths inherited from the audio and text backbones, that is, they are not learned in the cross-modal domain and are not transferred from one modality to another.

Read more

8/26/2024

Fusing Audio and Metadata Embeddings Improves Language-based Audio Retrieval
Total Score

0

Fusing Audio and Metadata Embeddings Improves Language-based Audio Retrieval

Paul Primus, Gerhard Widmer

Matching raw audio signals with textual descriptions requires understanding the audio's content and the description's semantics and then drawing connections between the two modalities. This paper investigates a hybrid retrieval system that utilizes audio metadata as an additional clue to understand the content of audio signals before matching them with textual queries. We experimented with metadata often attached to audio recordings, such as keywords and natural-language descriptions, and we investigated late and mid-level fusion strategies to merge audio and metadata. Our hybrid approach with keyword metadata and late fusion improved the retrieval performance over a content-based baseline by 2.36 and 3.69 pp. mAP@10 on the ClothoV2 and AudioCaps benchmarks, respectively.

Read more

6/26/2024

Transforming LLMs into Cross-modal and Cross-lingual RetrievalSystems
Total Score

0

Transforming LLMs into Cross-modal and Cross-lingual RetrievalSystems

Frank Palma Gomez, Ramon Sanabria, Yun-hsuan Sung, Daniel Cer, Siddharth Dalmia, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego

Large language models (LLMs) are trained on text-only data that go far beyond the languages with paired speech and text data. At the same time, Dual Encoder (DE) based retrieval systems project queries and documents into the same embedding space and have demonstrated their success in retrieval and bi-text mining. To match speech and text in many languages, we propose using LLMs to initialize multi-modal DE retrieval systems. Unlike traditional methods, our system doesn't require speech data during LLM pre-training and can exploit LLM's multilingual text understanding capabilities to match speech and text in languages unseen during retrieval training. Our multi-modal LLM-based retrieval system is capable of matching speech and text in 102 languages despite only training on 21 languages. Our system outperforms previous systems trained explicitly on all 102 languages. We achieve a 10% absolute improvement in Recall@1 averaged across these languages. Additionally, our model demonstrates cross-lingual speech and text matching, which is further enhanced by readily available machine translation data.

Read more

7/11/2024