Identifiability of a statistical model with two latent vectors: Importance of the dimensionality relation and application to graph embedding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the identifiability of a statistical model with two latent vectors, emphasizing the importance of the dimensionality relation and its application to graph embedding.
- It explores the conditions under which the model parameters can be uniquely recovered from the observed data, a critical consideration in various machine learning and statistical applications.
- The research provides insights into the interplay between the dimensionality of the latent vectors and the identifiability of the model, offering guidance for designing effective data-driven models.
Plain English Explanation
In many machine learning and statistical models, the observed data is assumed to be generated from underlying "latent" or hidden factors. The paper focuses on a specific type of model where there are two sets of these hidden factors or "latent vectors."
The key question the researchers investigate is: under what conditions can we uniquely recover or "identify" these latent vectors from the observed data? This is an important problem because if the model is not identifiable, the hidden factors learned from the data may not reflect the true underlying structure, leading to biased or unreliable results.
The researchers show that the relationship between the dimensionality, or the number of elements, in the two latent vectors is crucial for the identifiability of the model. Depending on how the dimensions of the latent vectors compare, the model may or may not be identifiable.
This insight has important implications for applications like graph embedding, where the goal is to represent the structure of a network or graph in a low-dimensional space. The dimensionality of the latent vectors used in the embedding process can impact whether the true underlying structure of the graph can be faithfully recovered.
By understanding the identifiability conditions, researchers can design more effective data-driven models that can reliably extract the hidden factors from observed data, leading to more accurate and trustworthy insights.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a statistical model where the observed data is assumed to be generated from two latent vectors, denoted as x and y. The researchers investigate the conditions under which the model parameters, including the distributions of x and y, can be uniquely identified from the observed data.
The core of the analysis focuses on the relationship between the dimensionality of the latent vectors, d_x and d_y, and the identifiability of the model. The researchers establish theoretical results showing that the identifiability of the model depends on the comparison between d_x and d_y.
Specifically, the paper demonstrates that:
- If
d_x > d_y, the model is identifiable, meaning the true underlying parameters can be uniquely recovered from the observed data. - If
d_x < d_y, the model is not identifiable, and there may be multiple sets of model parameters that can explain the observed data equally well. - If
d_x = d_y, the model is identifiable under certain additional conditions.
These findings have important implications for practical applications, such as graph embedding, where the latent vectors represent the low-dimensional representation of the graph structure. The researchers show that the dimensionality relation between the node embeddings and the edge embeddings plays a crucial role in the identifiability and recoverability of the true graph structure.
The paper also discusses the connections between this identifiability problem and related concepts, such as causal effect identification and hidden recoverable conditions, highlighting the broader significance of the identifiability problem in statistical modeling and machine learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the identifiability of the proposed statistical model with two latent vectors. The results offer valuable insights into the importance of understanding the dimensionality relationship between the latent factors for reliable model inference and interpretation.
One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a specific model structure with two latent vectors. While this setting captures many practical applications, it would be interesting to see if the insights can be generalized to models with a larger number of latent vectors or more complex data generative processes.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the practical implications of non-identifiability in depth. It would be helpful to see more discussion on how researchers and practitioners can detect and address issues of non-identifiability in their own models, perhaps through spectral clustering or other techniques.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide guidance on how to determine the appropriate dimensionality of the latent vectors for a given problem. Developing heuristics or data-driven methods to inform this choice would enhance the practical utility of the proposed framework.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of identifiability in statistical models with latent variables. The insights provided can help researchers and practitioners design more robust and trustworthy data-driven models, leading to more reliable insights and applications.
Conclusion
The paper investigates the identifiability of a statistical model with two latent vectors, emphasizing the importance of the dimensionality relationship between the latent factors. The researchers establish theoretical results showing that the identifiability of the model depends on whether the dimensionality of the two latent vectors is equal, greater, or less.
These findings have important implications for a wide range of applications, such as graph embedding, where the dimensionality of the node and edge representations can impact the recoverability of the true underlying graph structure. The insights provided in this paper can help researchers and practitioners design more effective data-driven models that can reliably extract and interpret the hidden factors from observed data.
By understanding the identifiability conditions, researchers can develop more trustworthy and robust machine learning and statistical models, leading to more accurate and reliable insights that can positively impact various domains, from social network analysis to recommender systems and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Identifiability of a statistical model with two latent vectors: Importance of the dimensionality relation and application to graph embedding
Hiroaki Sasaki
Identifiability of statistical models is a key notion in unsupervised representation learning. Recent work of nonlinear independent component analysis (ICA) employs auxiliary data and has established identifiable conditions. This paper proposes a statistical model of two latent vectors with single auxiliary data generalizing nonlinear ICA, and establishes various identifiability conditions. Unlike previous work, the two latent vectors in the proposed model can have arbitrary dimensions, and this property enables us to reveal an insightful dimensionality relation among two latent vectors and auxiliary data in identifiability conditions. Furthermore, surprisingly, we prove that the indeterminacies of the proposed model has the same as emph{linear} ICA under certain conditions: The elements in the latent vector can be recovered up to their permutation and scales. Next, we apply the identifiability theory to a statistical model for graph data. As a result, one of the identifiability conditions includes an appealing implication: Identifiability of the statistical model could depend on the maximum value of link weights in graph data. Then, we propose a practical method for identifiable graph embedding. Finally, we numerically demonstrate that the proposed method well-recovers the latent vectors and model identifiability clearly depends on the maximum value of link weights, which supports the implication of our theoretical results
Read more5/31/2024
0
On the Identifiability of Sparse ICA without Assuming Non-Gaussianity
Ignavier Ng, Yujia Zheng, Xinshuai Dong, Kun Zhang
Independent component analysis (ICA) is a fundamental statistical tool used to reveal hidden generative processes from observed data. However, traditional ICA approaches struggle with the rotational invariance inherent in Gaussian distributions, often necessitating the assumption of non-Gaussianity in the underlying sources. This may limit their applicability in broader contexts. To accommodate Gaussian sources, we develop an identifiability theory that relies on second-order statistics without imposing further preconditions on the distribution of sources, by introducing novel assumptions on the connective structure from sources to observed variables. Different from recent work that focuses on potentially restrictive connective structures, our proposed assumption of structural variability is both considerably less restrictive and provably necessary. Furthermore, we propose two estimation methods based on second-order statistics and sparsity constraint. Experimental results are provided to validate our identifiability theory and estimation methods.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding
Daniela Schkoda, Elina Robeva, Mathias Drton
We consider linear non-Gaussian structural equation models that involve latent confounding. In this setting, the causal structure is identifiable, but, in general, it is not possible to identify the specific causal effects. Instead, a finite number of different causal effects result in the same observational distribution. Most existing algorithms for identifying these causal effects use overcomplete independent component analysis (ICA), which often suffers from convergence to local optima. Furthermore, the number of latent variables must be known a priori. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm that operates recursively rather than using overcomplete ICA. The algorithm first infers a source, estimates the effect of the source and its latent parents on their descendants, and then eliminates their influence from the data. For both source identification and effect size estimation, we use rank conditions on matrices formed from higher-order cumulants. We prove asymptotic correctness under the mild assumption that locally, the number of latent variables never exceeds the number of observed variables. Simulation studies demonstrate that our method achieves comparable performance to overcomplete ICA even though it does not know the number of latents in advance.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Causal Effect Identification in LiNGAM Models with Latent Confounders
Daniele Tramontano, Yaroslav Kivva, Saber Salehkaleybar, Mathias Drton, Negar Kiyavash
We study the generic identifiability of causal effects in linear non-Gaussian acyclic models (LiNGAM) with latent variables. We consider the problem in two main settings: When the causal graph is known a priori, and when it is unknown. In both settings, we provide a complete graphical characterization of the identifiable direct or total causal effects among observed variables. Moreover, we propose efficient algorithms to certify the graphical conditions. Finally, we propose an adaptation of the reconstruction independent component analysis (RICA) algorithm that estimates the causal effects from the observational data given the causal graph. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed method in estimating the causal effects.
Read more6/5/2024