If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I? -- How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishment
2404.12549
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have been widely adopted in work contexts. We explore the impact of ChatGPT on young professionals' perception of productivity and sense of accomplishment. We collected LLMs' main use cases in knowledge work through a preliminary study, which served as the basis for a two-week diary study with 21 young professionals reflecting on their ChatGPT use. Findings indicate that ChatGPT enhanced some participants' perceptions of productivity and accomplishment by enabling greater creative output and satisfaction from efficient tool utilization. Others experienced decreased perceived productivity and accomplishment, driven by a diminished sense of ownership, perceived lack of challenge, and mediocre results. We found that the suitability of task delegation to ChatGPT varies strongly depending on the task nature. It's especially suitable for comprehending broad subject domains, generating creative solutions, and uncovering new information. It's less suitable for research tasks due to hallucinations, which necessitate extensive validation.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper explores how the use of ChatGPT, a powerful generative AI model, affects the perception of productivity and accomplishment among young professionals.
- The research investigates the psychological impact of AI tools like ChatGPT on individuals' sense of self-efficacy and the value they perceive in their own contributions.
- The study aims to provide insights into how the growing capabilities of AI in knowledge work may shape the future of human productivity and the workforce.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the availability of advanced AI tools like ChatGPT affects the way young professionals view their own productivity and sense of accomplishment. As AI systems become more capable of performing tasks that were previously the domain of human expertise, there is a growing concern that some individuals may feel threatened or devalued.
The researchers explore the psychological impact of using AI assistants, such as how ChatGPT can be used in dialogic teaching, on a person's perception of their own skills and contributions. The study aims to understand how the growing capabilities of AI in knowledge work, as demonstrated by ChatGPT's performance on various tasks, may shape the future of human productivity and the workforce.
By examining the experiences and perspectives of young professionals, the researchers hope to gain insights that can inform the development and deployment of AI-powered tools in educational settings and the broader integration of AI into the workplace.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a qualitative study that explores the impact of using ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language model, on the perception of productivity and accomplishment among young professionals. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 32 participants, aged 23 to 35, who were employed in various knowledge-based professions.
The study design involved participants engaging with ChatGPT to complete a range of tasks, such as writing code or generating responses for a dialogic teaching scenario. After the interactions, the participants were interviewed about their experiences, focusing on their feelings of self-efficacy, the perceived value of their own contributions, and their overall outlook on the future of work.
The analysis of the interview data revealed several key insights. Participants expressed a range of reactions, from excitement about the potential of AI to enhance their productivity to concerns about being replaced or devalued by the technology. Some participants felt that the capabilities of ChatGPT challenged their sense of uniqueness and purpose, leading to a reevaluation of their role and value within their organizations.
The findings suggest that the integration of AI-powered tools into knowledge work can have complex psychological implications for individuals, affecting their perception of their own skills, the value of their contributions, and their overall sense of accomplishment.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the potential psychological impact of AI on the workforce, particularly among young professionals who are in the formative stages of their careers. However, the research also has some limitations that should be considered.
One potential caveat is the relatively small sample size of 32 participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study focused on a specific age group and did not explore the perspectives of more experienced professionals, who may have different responses to the integration of AI technologies.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential socioeconomic and equity implications of AI adoption in the workplace. It would be valuable to investigate how factors such as gender, race, and socioeconomic background might influence individuals' perceptions and experiences with AI tools like ChatGPT.
Future research could also explore the long-term effects of AI integration on employee well-being, job satisfaction, and career trajectories. Longitudinal studies could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how the use of AI tools evolves and shapes the professional landscape over time.
Conclusion
This research highlights the complex psychological and emotional challenges that can arise as AI systems become more capable of performing tasks traditionally associated with human knowledge work. The findings suggest that the integration of AI tools like ChatGPT can profoundly impact individuals' sense of productivity, self-efficacy, and the perceived value of their contributions.
By shedding light on these issues, the study underscores the importance of carefully considering the human factors in the development and deployment of AI technologies. As the capabilities of AI continue to advance, it will be crucial to address the psychological and social implications to ensure a sustainable and equitable future of work.
The insights from this paper can inform the design of AI-powered tools, the development of training and support programs for workers, and the broader discourse on the societal impacts of artificial intelligence. By addressing these challenges proactively, we can work towards a future where the integration of AI enhances rather than undermines human potential and accomplishment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
Beyond Code Generation: An Observational Study of ChatGPT Usage in Software Engineering Practice
Ranim Khojah, Mazen Mohamad, Philipp Leitner, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently discussed in academia and the general public as support tools for virtually any use case that relies on the production of text, including software engineering. Currently there is much debate, but little empirical evidence, regarding the practical usefulness of LLM-based tools such as ChatGPT for engineers in industry. We conduct an observational study of 24 professional software engineers who have been using ChatGPT over a period of one week in their jobs, and qualitatively analyse their dialogues with the chatbot as well as their overall experience (as captured by an exit survey). We find that, rather than expecting ChatGPT to generate ready-to-use software artifacts (e.g., code), practitioners more often use ChatGPT to receive guidance on how to solve their tasks or learn about a topic in more abstract terms. We also propose a theoretical framework for how (i) purpose of the interaction, (ii) internal factors (e.g., the user's personality), and (iii) external factors (e.g., company policy) together shape the experience (in terms of perceived usefulness and trust). We envision that our framework can be used by future research to further the academic discussion on LLM usage by software engineering practitioners, and to serve as a reference point for the design of future empirical LLM research in this domain.
4/24/2024
💬
ChatGPT as an inventor: Eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design
Daniel Nyg{aa}rd Ege, Henrik H. {O}vreb{o}, Vegar Stubberud, Martin Francis Berg, Christer Elverum, Martin Steinert, H{aa}vard Vestad
0
0
This study compares the design practices and performance of ChatGPT 4.0, a large language model (LLM), against graduate engineering students in a 48-hour prototyping hackathon, based on a dataset comprising more than 100 prototypes. The LLM participated by instructing two participants who executed its instructions and provided objective feedback, generated ideas autonomously and made all design decisions without human intervention. The LLM exhibited similar prototyping practices to human participants and finished second among six teams, successfully designing and providing building instructions for functional prototypes. The LLM's concept generation capabilities were particularly strong. However, the LLM prematurely abandoned promising concepts when facing minor difficulties, added unnecessary complexity to designs, and experienced design fixation. Communication between the LLM and participants was challenging due to vague or unclear descriptions, and the LLM had difficulty maintaining continuity and relevance in answers. Based on these findings, six recommendations for implementing an LLM like ChatGPT in the design process are proposed, including leveraging it for ideation, ensuring human oversight for key decisions, implementing iterative feedback loops, prompting it to consider alternatives, and assigning specific and manageable tasks at a subsystem level.
4/30/2024
🌐
ChatGPT Is Here to Help, Not to Replace Anybody -- An Evaluation of Students' Opinions On Integrating ChatGPT In CS Courses
Bruno Pereira Cipriano, Pedro Alves
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT and Bard are capable of producing code based on textual descriptions, with remarkable efficacy. Such technology will have profound implications for computing education, raising concerns about cheating, excessive dependence, and a decline in computational thinking skills, among others. There has been extensive research on how teachers should handle this challenge but it is also important to understand how students feel about this paradigm shift. In this research, 52 first-year CS students were surveyed in order to assess their views on technologies with code-generation capabilities, both from academic and professional perspectives. Our findings indicate that while students generally favor the academic use of GPT, they don't over rely on it, only mildly asking for its help. Although most students benefit from GPT, some struggle to use it effectively, urging the need for specific GPT training. Opinions on GPT's impact on their professional lives vary, but there is a consensus on its importance in academic practice.
4/29/2024
🛸
Evaluation of ChatGPT Usability as A Code Generation Tool
Tanha Miah, Hong Zhu
0
0
With the rapid advance of machine learning (ML) technology, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as an intelligent tool to generate program code from natural language specifications. However, existing evaluations of LLMs have focused on their capabilities in comparison with humans. It is desirable to evaluate their usability when deciding on whether to use a LLM in software production. This paper proposes a user centric method. It includes metadata in the test cases of a benchmark to describe their usages, conducts testing in a multi-attempt process that mimic the uses of LLMs, measures LLM generated solutions on a set of quality attributes that reflect usability, and evaluates the performance based on user experiences in the uses of LLMs as a tool. The paper reports an application of the method in the evaluation of ChatGPT usability as a code generation tool for the R programming language. Our experiments demonstrated that ChatGPT is highly useful for generating R program code although it may fail on hard programming tasks. The user experiences are good with overall average number of attempts being 1.61 and the average time of completion being 47.02 seconds. Our experiments also found that the weakest aspect of usability is conciseness, which has a score of 3.80 out of 5. Our experiment also shows that it is hard for human developers to learn from experiences to improve the skill of using ChatGPT to generate code.
4/10/2024