IID Relaxation by Logical Expressivity: A Research Agenda for Fitting Logics to Neurosymbolic Requirements
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the relaxation of the Independent and Identically Distributed (IID) assumption in neurosymbolic learning by examining the role of logical expressivity.
- The authors propose a research agenda to investigate how different logics can be fitted to the specific requirements of neurosymbolic systems, aiming to improve the representational capabilities and reasoning of these hybrid approaches.
- Key topics covered include non-IID logic fragments, logical expressivity, and the potential benefits of aligning logical formalisms with the unique characteristics of neurosymbolic architectures.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a challenge in the field of neurosymbolic learning, which aims to combine the strengths of neural networks and symbolic reasoning. Typically, these systems rely on the assumption that the data they are trained on is Independent and Identically Distributed (IID). However, in many real-world scenarios, this assumption may not hold true.
The authors propose that by carefully selecting the logical formalisms used in neurosymbolic systems, it may be possible to relax the IID assumption and improve the systems' representational capabilities and reasoning abilities. They suggest exploring different "non-IID logic fragments" - specialized logics that can better capture the complex, interdependent relationships found in real-world data.
By aligning the logical expressivity of the system with the specific requirements of neurosymbolic architectures, the researchers believe they can develop more powerful and versatile hybrid AI models. This could lead to breakthroughs in areas such as automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition, unifying data and background knowledge for scientific discovery, and improved probabilistic reasoning in neurosymbolic classification techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper argues that the IID assumption, which is often made in machine learning, may not be appropriate for neurosymbolic learning systems. These hybrid approaches combine neural networks with symbolic reasoning, and the authors suggest that by carefully selecting the logical formalisms used, it may be possible to relax the IID assumption and improve the systems' representational capabilities and reasoning abilities.
The authors propose a research agenda to investigate "non-IID logic fragments" - specialized logics that can better capture the complex, interdependent relationships found in real-world data. By aligning the logical expressivity of the system with the specific requirements of neurosymbolic architectures, the researchers believe they can develop more powerful and versatile hybrid AI models.
The paper discusses potential applications of this approach, including automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition, unifying data and background knowledge for scientific discovery, and improved probabilistic reasoning in neurosymbolic classification techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling research agenda, but it does not provide any specific details or experiments. The authors acknowledge that this is a conceptual proposal and that further research is needed to validate their ideas.
One potential limitation is that the selection of appropriate logical formalisms for neurosymbolic systems may be a challenging task, as it requires a deep understanding of both the logical and neural aspects of the system. The authors do not provide a clear roadmap for how researchers can identify the most suitable logics for specific neurosymbolic applications.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential computational and scalability challenges that may arise when integrating more expressive logics into neurosymbolic architectures. The trade-offs between logical expressivity and efficient reasoning may need to be carefully considered.
Overall, the paper raises an important research question and provides a thought-provoking framework for exploring the relaxation of the IID assumption in neurosymbolic learning. However, further work is needed to validate the proposed ideas and develop practical solutions that can be applied in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to addressing the limitations of the IID assumption in neurosymbolic learning. By exploring the use of "non-IID logic fragments" and aligning the logical expressivity of the system with the specific requirements of neurosymbolic architectures, the authors believe it may be possible to develop more powerful and versatile hybrid AI models.
The potential benefits of this research agenda include breakthroughs in areas such as automated discovery of symbolic laws governing skill acquisition, unifying data and background knowledge for scientific discovery, and improved probabilistic reasoning in neurosymbolic classification techniques.
While the paper presents a compelling conceptual framework, further research is needed to validate the proposed ideas and address potential challenges in implementing more expressive logics within neurosymbolic systems. Nonetheless, this research agenda opens up new avenues for advancing the field of hybrid AI and overcoming the limitations of the IID assumption in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
IID Relaxation by Logical Expressivity: A Research Agenda for Fitting Logics to Neurosymbolic Requirements
Maarten C. Stol, Alessandra Mileo
Neurosymbolic background knowledge and the expressivity required of its logic can break Machine Learning assumptions about data Independence and Identical Distribution. In this position paper we propose to analyze IID relaxation in a hierarchy of logics that fit different use case requirements. We discuss the benefits of exploiting known data dependencies and distribution constraints for Neurosymbolic use cases and argue that the expressivity required for this knowledge has implications for the design of underlying ML routines. This opens a new research agenda with general questions about Neurosymbolic background knowledge and the expressivity required of its logic.
Read more7/2/2024
0
On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learning
Emile van Krieken, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo M. Ponti, Antonio Vergari
State-of-the-art neurosymbolic learning systems use probabilistic reasoning to guide neural networks towards predictions that conform to logical constraints over symbols. Many such systems assume that the probabilities of the considered symbols are conditionally independent given the input to simplify learning and reasoning. We study and criticise this assumption, highlighting how it can hinder optimisation and prevent uncertainty quantification. We prove that loss functions bias conditionally independent neural networks to become overconfident in their predictions. As a result, they are unable to represent uncertainty over multiple valid options. Furthermore, we prove that these loss functions are difficult to optimise: they are non-convex, and their minima are usually highly disconnected. Our theoretical analysis gives the foundation for replacing the conditional independence assumption and designing more expressive neurosymbolic probabilistic models.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Towards Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming with Neurosymbolic Inference and Relaxation
Fieke Hillerstrom, Gertjan Burghouts
Many inductive logic programming (ILP) methods are incapable of learning programs from probabilistic background knowledge, e.g. coming from sensory data or neural networks with probabilities. We propose Propper, which handles flawed and probabilistic background knowledge by extending ILP with a combination of neurosymbolic inference, a continuous criterion for hypothesis selection (BCE) and a relaxation of the hypothesis constrainer (NoisyCombo). For relational patterns in noisy images, Propper can learn programs from as few as 8 examples. It outperforms binary ILP and statistical models such as a Graph Neural Network.
Read more8/22/2024
🤿
0
Semantic Objective Functions: A distribution-aware method for adding logical constraints in deep learning
Miguel Angel Mendez-Lucero, Enrique Bojorquez Gallardo, Vaishak Belle
Issues of safety, explainability, and efficiency are of increasing concern in learning systems deployed with hard and soft constraints. Symbolic Constrained Learning and Knowledge Distillation techniques have shown promising results in this area, by embedding and extracting knowledge, as well as providing logical constraints during neural network training. Although many frameworks exist to date, through an integration of logic and information geometry, we provide a construction and theoretical framework for these tasks that generalize many approaches. We propose a loss-based method that embeds knowledge-enforces logical constraints-into a machine learning model that outputs probability distributions. This is done by constructing a distribution from the external knowledge/logic formula and constructing a loss function as a linear combination of the original loss function with the Fisher-Rao distance or Kullback-Leibler divergence to the constraint distribution. This construction includes logical constraints in the form of propositional formulas (Boolean variables), formulas of a first-order language with finite variables over a model with compact domain (categorical and continuous variables), and in general, likely applicable to any statistical model that was pretrained with semantic information. We evaluate our method on a variety of learning tasks, including classification tasks with logic constraints, transferring knowledge from logic formulas, and knowledge distillation from general distributions.
Read more5/28/2024