Impact of Extensions on Browser Performance: An Empirical Study on Google Chrome
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the impact of browser extensions on the performance of Google Chrome
- Measures metrics like energy consumption, response time, and CPU usage to analyze the performance impact
- Compares the performance of Chrome with and without extensions installed
Plain English Explanation
This paper investigates how browser extensions can affect the performance of the Google Chrome web browser. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/influence-gameplay-duration-hand-tracking-controller-based">Browser extensions</a> are additional software programs that users can install to add new features or customize their browsing experience. The researchers wanted to understand how these extensions impact important aspects of browser performance, such as energy consumption, response time, and CPU usage.
They conducted experiments by measuring these performance metrics for Chrome both with and without various extensions installed. This allowed them to see the direct impact that extensions can have on the overall performance of the browser. The findings from this study can help users make more informed choices about which extensions to install, and can also guide browser developers in designing more efficient extension systems.
Technical Explanation
The researchers designed experiments to measure the performance impact of browser extensions on Google Chrome. They installed a variety of common extensions and recorded metrics like energy consumption, response time, and CPU usage. These measurements were compared to a baseline of Chrome running without any extensions.
The results showed that extensions can have a significant effect on browser performance. Some extensions caused substantial increases in energy usage and response times, while others had minimal impact. The CPU usage patterns also varied, with some extensions causing spikes in CPU utilization. The researchers analyzed these findings to understand the mechanisms by which extensions influence Chrome's performance.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/petshop-dataset-finding-causes-performance-issues-across">The study provides insights</a> into the tradeoffs users face when deciding which extensions to install, as well as guidance for browser developers on designing more efficient extension systems that minimize performance degradation.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed experiment to measure the impact of browser extensions on Chrome's performance. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific set of popular extensions. The performance impact may vary for less common or more specialized extensions.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the root causes of the performance differences observed. Further research could investigate the underlying architectural and implementation details that lead to varying levels of performance impact from different types of extensions.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/lessons-from-formally-verified-deployed-software-systems">While the study focuses on Chrome</a>, the findings may have implications for other browser platforms as well. Examining the performance effects of extensions across multiple browsers could yield valuable comparative insights.
Conclusion
This empirical study on the impact of browser extensions on Google Chrome's performance provides valuable insights for both users and browser developers. The results demonstrate that the choice of extensions can significantly affect key metrics like energy consumption, response time, and CPU usage.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/navigating-post-api-dilemma-or-search-engine">These findings can help users make more informed decisions</a> about which extensions to install, balancing the desired features with the potential performance trade-offs. For browser vendors, the study highlights the need to design more efficient extension systems that minimize the performance impact on the overall browsing experience.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mobile-user-experience-from-lens-project-based">As web browsers continue to be a central part of our digital lives</a>, understanding and optimizing the performance impact of extensions is an important area of research that can have far-reaching implications for both users and the broader technology ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
Impact of Extensions on Browser Performance: An Empirical Study on Google Chrome
Bihui Jin, Heng Li, Ying Zou
Web browsers have been used widely by users to conduct various online activities, such as information seeking or online shopping. To improve user experience and extend the functionality of browsers, practitioners provide mechanisms to allow users to install third-party-provided plugins (i.e., extensions) on their browsers. However, little is known about the performance implications caused by such extensions. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to understand the impact of extensions on the user-perceived performance (i.e., energy consumption and page load time) of Google Chrome, the most popular browser. We study a total of 72 representative extensions from 11 categories (e.g., Developer Tools and Sports). We observe that browser performance can be negatively impacted by the use of extensions, even when the extensions are used in unintended circumstances (e.g., when logging into an extension is not granted but required, or when an extension is not used for designated websites). We also identify a set of factors that significantly influence the performance impact of extensions, such as code complexity and privacy practices (i.e., collection of user data) adopted by the extensions. Based on our empirical observations, we provide recommendations for developers and users to mitigate the performance impact of browser extensions, such as conducting performance testing and optimization for unintended usage scenarios of extensions, or adhering to proper usage practices of extensions (e.g., logging into an extension when required).
Read more4/11/2024
🛸
0
Through the Lens of Google CrUX: Dissecting Web Browsing Experience Across Devices and Countries
Jayasree Sengupta, Tanya Shreedhar, Dinh Nguyen, Robert Kramer, Vaibhav Bajpai
User quality of experience in the context of Web browsing is being researched widely, with plenty of developments occurring alongside technological advances, not seldom driven by big industry players. With the huge reach and infrastructure of Google, the Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) provides quantitative real-life measurement data of a vast magnitude. Analysis of this steadily expanding dataset aggregating different user experience metrics, yields tangible insights into actual trends and developments. Hence, this paper is the first to study the CrUX dataset from the viewpoint of relevant metrics by quantitative evaluation of users Web browsing experience across three device types and nine European countries. Analysis of data segmented by connection type in the device dimension shows desktops outperforming other device types for all metrics. Similar analysis in the country dimension, shows North European countries (Sweden, Finland) having maximum 4G connections (85.99%, 81.41% respectively) and steadily performing 25%-36% better at the 75th percentile across all metrics compared to the worst performing country. Such a high-level longitudinal analysis of real-life Web browsing experience provides an extensive base for future research.
Read more4/19/2024
0
An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search
Celestine Mendler-Dunner, Gabriele Carovano, Moritz Hardt
The power of digital platforms is at the center of major ongoing policy and regulatory efforts. To advance existing debates, we designed and executed an experiment to measure the power of online search providers, building on the recent definition of performative power. Instantiated in our setting, performative power quantifies the ability of a search engine to steer web traffic by rearranging results. To operationalize this definition we developed a browser extension that performs unassuming randomized experiments in the background. These randomized experiments emulate updates to the search algorithm and identify the causal effect of different content arrangements on clicks. We formally relate these causal effects to performative power. Analyzing tens of thousands of clicks, we discuss what our robust quantitative findings say about the power of online search engines. More broadly, we envision our work to serve as a blueprint for how performative power and online experiments can be integrated with future investigations into the economic power of digital platforms.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Anatomizing Deep Learning Inference in Web Browsers
Qipeng Wang, Shiqi Jiang, Zhenpeng Chen, Xu Cao, Yuanchun Li, Aoyu Li, Yun Ma, Ting Cao, Xuanzhe Liu
Web applications have increasingly adopted Deep Learning (DL) through in-browser inference, wherein DL inference performs directly within Web browsers. The actual performance of in-browser inference and its impacts on the quality of experience (QoE) remain unexplored, and urgently require new QoE measurements beyond traditional ones, e.g., mainly focusing on page load time. To bridge this gap, we make the first comprehensive performance measurement of in-browser inference to date. Our approach proposes new metrics to measure in-browser inference: responsiveness, smoothness, and inference accuracy. Our extensive analysis involves 9 representative DL models across Web browsers of 50 popular PC devices and 20 mobile devices. The results reveal that in-browser inference exhibits a substantial latency gap, averaging 16.9 times slower on CPU and 4.9 times slower on GPU compared to native inference on PC devices. The gap on mobile CPU and mobile GPU is 15.8 times and 7.8 times, respectively. Furthermore, we identify contributing factors to such latency gap, including underutilized hardware instruction sets, inherent overhead in the runtime environment, resource contention within the browser, and inefficiencies in software libraries and GPU abstractions. Additionally, in-browser inference imposes significant memory demands, at times exceeding 334.6 times the size of the DL models themselves, partly attributable to suboptimal memory management. We also observe that in-browser inference leads to a significant 67.2% increase in the time it takes for GUI components to render within Web browsers, significantly affecting the overall user QoE of Web applications reliant on this technology
Read more7/26/2024