An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the performative power of online search engines, challenging the view of them as neutral "cameras" that simply reflect the world
- Proposes a framework for measuring how search engines can actively shape and influence the information landscape
- Explores the sociopolitical implications of search engines wielding significant "performative power"
Plain English Explanation
This paper takes a critical look at online search engines, arguing that they are not just neutral "cameras" that passively reflect the world, but rather active "engines" that can significantly shape and influence the information landscape. The researchers propose a framework for measuring the "performative power" of search engines - that is, their ability to actively construct and transform the information that users encounter.
The paper explores how search engines, through their ranking algorithms and content curation, can amplify certain narratives, perspectives, and pieces of information over others. This can have important sociopolitical implications, as search engines may inadvertently or intentionally reinforce certain ideological viewpoints or power structures. The researchers argue that it's crucial to understand and scrutinize the performative power of search engines, rather than treating them as neutral tools.
By linking to the "political-economy-link-based-web-search" paper, the authors highlight how search engine algorithms can be influenced by political and economic factors, shaping the information that users access. Similarly, the push-pull framework discussed in this paper provides a way to analyze how search engines can "push" certain content to users and "pull" their attention in specific directions.
The paper also touches on the potential for generative search engines and performative optimization to further amplify the performative power of search, as these technologies can actively create and manipulate the information landscape. The authors suggest that the use of generative search engines in knowledge work may have complex implications that warrant further study.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for measuring the "performative power" of online search engines, challenging the view of them as neutral "cameras" that simply reflect the world. The researchers argue that search engines are more akin to "engines" that actively shape and influence the information landscape.
The proposed framework examines how search engines, through their ranking algorithms and content curation, can amplify certain narratives, perspectives, and pieces of information over others. This can have significant sociopolitical implications, as search engines may inadvertently or intentionally reinforce certain ideological viewpoints or power structures.
The authors draw on the political economy of link-based web search to highlight how search engine algorithms can be influenced by political and economic factors. They also discuss the push-pull framework for measuring attentional agency, which provides a way to analyze how search engines can "push" certain content to users and "pull" their attention in specific directions.
The paper also explores the potential for generative search engines and performative optimization to further amplify the performative power of search, as these technologies can actively create and manipulate the information landscape. The authors suggest that the use of generative search engines in knowledge work may have complex implications that warrant further study.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important questions about the sociopolitical implications of search engines' performative power and the need to scrutinize their role in shaping the information landscape. The researchers provide a compelling framework for measuring this performative power, but the application and empirical validation of the framework could be further explored.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the macro-level effects of search engines, without delving deeply into the specific mechanisms and design choices that contribute to their performative power. A more granular analysis of how search engine algorithms, user interface, and other design elements influence information exposure and user behavior could provide additional insights.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively address potential countermeasures or interventions that could help mitigate the negative aspects of search engines' performative power. Exploring regulatory frameworks, algorithmic transparency, user empowerment, or alternative search models could be valuable areas for further research and discussion.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by challenging the prevailing view of search engines as neutral tools and highlighting the need for a more critical examination of their sociopolitical impacts. Encouraging readers to think critically about the research and form their own opinions is an important aspect of this work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling framework for understanding the performative power of online search engines, challenging the notion that they are merely passive "cameras" that reflect the world. The researchers argue that search engines are active "engines" that can significantly shape and influence the information landscape, with important sociopolitical implications.
By exploring the political economy of search, the push-pull dynamics of attention, and the potential impacts of generative search technologies, the paper offers a multifaceted perspective on the performative power of search engines. This work encourages a critical examination of search engines' role in constructing and reinforcing certain narratives, perspectives, and power structures.
As search engines become increasingly integral to how people access and consume information, understanding and scrutinizing their performative power is of crucial importance. This paper lays the groundwork for further research and discussion on this important topic, with the ultimate goal of promoting a more transparent, accountable, and equitable information ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search
Celestine Mendler-Dunner, Gabriele Carovano, Moritz Hardt
The power of digital platforms is at the center of major ongoing policy and regulatory efforts. To advance existing debates, we designed and executed an experiment to measure the power of online search providers, building on the recent definition of performative power. Instantiated in our setting, performative power quantifies the ability of a search engine to steer web traffic by rearranging results. To operationalize this definition we developed a browser extension that performs unassuming randomized experiments in the background. These randomized experiments emulate updates to the search algorithm and identify the causal effect of different content arrangements on clicks. We formally relate these causal effects to performative power. Analyzing tens of thousands of clicks, we discuss what our robust quantitative findings say about the power of online search engines. More broadly, we envision our work to serve as a blueprint for how performative power and online experiments can be integrated with future investigations into the economic power of digital platforms.
Read more5/30/2024
0
On the Political Economy of Link-based Web Search
Deepak P, James Steinhoff, Stanley Simoes
Web search engines arguably form the most popular data-driven systems in contemporary society. They wield a considerable power by functioning as gatekeepers of the Web, with most user journeys on the Web beginning with them. Starting from the late 1990s, search engines have been dominated by the paradigm of link-based web search. In this paper, we critically analyze the political economy of the paradigm of link-based web search, drawing upon insights and methodologies from critical political economy. We draw several insights on how link-based web search has led to phenomena that favor capital through long-term structural changes on the Web, and how it has led to accentuating unpaid digital labor and ecologically unsustainable practices, among several others. We show how contemporary observations on the degrading quality of link-based web search can be traced back to the internal contradictions with the paradigm, and how such socio-technical phenomena may lead to a disutility of the link-based web search model. Our contribution is primarily on enhancing the understanding of the political economy of link-based web search, and laying bare the phenomena at work, and implicitly catalyze the search for alternative models.
Read more4/26/2024
➖
0
Push and Pull: A Framework for Measuring Attentional Agency
Zachary Wojtowicz, Shrey Jain, Nicholas Vincent
We propose a framework for measuring attentional agency - the ability to allocate one's attention according to personal desires, goals, and intentions - on digital platforms. Platforms extend people's limited powers of attention by extrapolating their preferences to large collections of previously unconsidered informational objects. However, platforms typically also allow people to influence one another's attention. We introduce a formal framework for measuring how much a given platform empowers people to both pull information into their own attentional field and push information into the attentional fields of others. We also use these definitions to shed light on the implications of generative foundation models, which enable users to bypass the implicit attentional bargain that underlies embedded advertising and other methods for capturing economic value from informational goods. We conclude with a set of policy strategies that can be used to understand and reshape the distribution of attentional agency online.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Building a Scalable, Effective, and Steerable Search and Ranking Platform
Marjan Celikik, Jacek Wasilewski, Ana Peleteiro Ramallo, Alexey Kurennoy, Evgeny Labzin, Danilo Ascione, Tural Gurbanov, G'eraud Le Falher, Andrii Dzhoha, Ian Harris
Modern e-commerce platforms offer vast product selections, making it difficult for customers to find items that they like and that are relevant to their current session intent. This is why it is key for e-commerce platforms to have near real-time scalable and adaptable personalized ranking and search systems. While numerous methods exist in the scientific literature for building such systems, many are unsuitable for large-scale industrial use due to complexity and performance limitations. Consequently, industrial ranking systems often resort to computationally efficient yet simplistic retrieval or candidate generation approaches, which overlook near real-time and heterogeneous customer signals, which results in a less personalized and relevant experience. Moreover, related customer experiences are served by completely different systems, which increases complexity, maintenance, and inconsistent experiences. In this paper, we present a personalized, adaptable near real-time ranking platform that is reusable across various use cases, such as browsing and search, and that is able to cater to millions of items and customers under heavy load (thousands of requests per second). We employ transformer-based models through different ranking layers which can learn complex behavior patterns directly from customer action sequences while being able to incorporate temporal (e.g. in-session) and contextual information. We validate our system through a series of comprehensive offline and online real-world experiments at a large online e-commerce platform, and we demonstrate its superiority when compared to existing systems, both in terms of customer experience as well as in net revenue. Finally, we share the lessons learned from building a comprehensive, modern ranking platform for use in a large-scale e-commerce environment.
Read more9/5/2024