On the Impact of Uncertainty and Calibration on Likelihood-Ratio Membership Inference Attacks

Read original: arXiv:2402.10686 - Published 8/16/2024 by Meiyi Zhu, Caili Guo, Chunyan Feng, Osvaldo Simeone

🤯

Overview

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) allow attackers to determine if a specific data point was used to train a target machine learning model
This paper analyzes the performance of a state-of-the-art MIA called the likelihood ratio attack (LiRA) using an information-theoretical framework
The analysis looks at how factors like data uncertainty, limited training data, and model calibration impact the effectiveness of MIAs
The paper compares three different settings where the attacker receives varying levels of feedback from the target model

Plain English Explanation

In a membership inference attack, an attacker tries to figure out whether a particular piece of data was used to train a machine learning model. This paper looks at an advanced type of attack called the likelihood ratio attack (LiRA) and analyzes how effective it is.

The researchers use an information theory approach to understand the impact of different factors on the success of these attacks. They look at:

The random uncertainty in the actual data generation process
The uncertainty caused by having limited training data
How well-calibrated the target model is

The paper compares three scenarios where the attacker gets different levels of information from the target model:

The full output probability vector is disclosed
Only the probability for the true label is disclosed
An adaptive prediction set is produced instead of a single prediction

By analyzing these different settings, the researchers derive limits on how much advantage an attacker can gain from a membership inference attack. The simulation results show that these analytical bounds accurately predict the real-world effectiveness of the attacks.

Technical Explanation

This paper analyzes the performance of the likelihood ratio attack (LiRA), a state-of-the-art membership inference attack (MIA), within an information-theoretical framework. MIAs allow an attacker to determine whether a specific data point was used to train a target machine learning model.

The researchers investigate the impact of three key factors on the effectiveness of MIAs:

Aleatoric uncertainty: The inherent randomness in the true data generation process
Epistemic uncertainty: The uncertainty caused by having a limited training dataset
Model calibration: How well the target model's output probabilities match the true probabilities

They compare three different settings that provide the attacker with decreasingly informative feedback from the target model:

Confidence vector (CV) disclosure: The full output probability vector is released
True label confidence (TLC) disclosure: Only the probability assigned to the true label is disclosed
Decision set (DS) disclosure: An adaptive prediction set is produced, as in conformal prediction

The paper derives analytical bounds on the advantage an MIA attacker can gain in these different scenarios. The goal is to provide insights into how uncertainty and calibration impact the effectiveness of these attacks. Simulation results demonstrate that the derived bounds accurately predict the real-world performance of the LiRA attack.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough information-theoretical analysis of membership inference attacks, which is a valuable contribution to the field. The derivation of analytical bounds on attacker advantage offers insights into the factors that influence MIA effectiveness.

However, the analysis is limited to a specific attack method (LiRA) and the three disclosure settings considered. There may be other types of attacks or feedback mechanisms that could be explored. Additionally, the simulations are based on synthetic data, so the results may not fully generalize to real-world machine learning models and datasets.

Further research could investigate the performance of MIAs in more realistic settings, such as evaluating their impact on specific ML applications or examining range-based attacks in addition to the point-based attacks considered here. Exploring countermeasures to improve model robustness against these attacks would also be an important area for future work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of membership inference attacks using an information-theoretical framework. The researchers derive analytical bounds on the attacker's advantage and demonstrate that these bounds accurately predict the real-world performance of the likelihood ratio attack.

The findings provide valuable insights into the factors that influence the effectiveness of MIAs, such as data uncertainty, limited training data, and model calibration. This knowledge can inform the development of more robust machine learning models and contribute to the ongoing effort to better understand and mitigate the security risks posed by membership inference attacks.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

On the Impact of Uncertainty and Calibration on Likelihood-Ratio Membership Inference Attacks

Meiyi Zhu, Caili Guo, Chunyan Feng, Osvaldo Simeone

In a membership inference attack (MIA), an attacker exploits the overconfidence exhibited by typical machine learning models to determine whether a specific data point was used to train a target model. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the state-of-the-art likelihood ratio attack (LiRA) within an information-theoretical framework that allows the investigation of the impact of the aleatoric uncertainty in the true data generation process, of the epistemic uncertainty caused by a limited training data set, and of the calibration level of the target model. We compare three different settings, in which the attacker receives decreasingly informative feedback from the target model: confidence vector (CV) disclosure, in which the output probability vector is released; true label confidence (TLC) disclosure, in which only the probability assigned to the true label is made available by the model; and decision set (DS) disclosure, in which an adaptive prediction set is produced as in conformal prediction. We derive bounds on the advantage of an MIA adversary with the aim of offering insights into the impact of uncertainty and calibration on the effectiveness of MIAs. Simulation results demonstrate that the derived analytical bounds predict well the effectiveness of MIAs.

8/16/2024

Learning-Based Difficulty Calibration for Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks

Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An Wang

Machine learning models, in particular deep neural networks, are currently an integral part of various applications, from healthcare to finance. However, using sensitive data to train these models raises concerns about privacy and security. One method that has emerged to verify if the trained models are privacy-preserving is Membership Inference Attacks (MIA), which allows adversaries to determine whether a specific data point was part of a model's training dataset. While a series of MIAs have been proposed in the literature, only a few can achieve high True Positive Rates (TPR) in the low False Positive Rate (FPR) region (0.01%~1%). This is a crucial factor to consider for an MIA to be practically useful in real-world settings. In this paper, we present a novel approach to MIA that is aimed at significantly improving TPR at low FPRs. Our method, named learning-based difficulty calibration for MIA(LDC-MIA), characterizes data records by their hardness levels using a neural network classifier to determine membership. The experiment results show that LDC-MIA can improve TPR at low FPR by up to 4x compared to the other difficulty calibration based MIAs. It also has the highest Area Under ROC curve (AUC) across all datasets. Our method's cost is comparable with most of the existing MIAs, but is orders of magnitude more efficient than one of the state-of-the-art methods, LiRA, while achieving similar performance.

7/10/2024

Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks

Abhishek Sinha, Himanshi Tibrewal, Mansi Gupta, Nikhar Waghela, Shivank Garg

In this evolving era of machine learning security, membership inference attacks have emerged as a potent threat to the confidentiality of sensitive data. In this attack, adversaries aim to determine whether a particular point was used during the training of a target model. This paper proposes a new method to gauge a data point's membership in a model's training set. Instead of correlating loss with membership, as is traditionally done, we have leveraged the fact that training examples generally exhibit higher confidence values when classified into their actual class. During training, the model is essentially being 'fit' to the training data and might face particular difficulties in generalization to unseen data. This asymmetry leads to the model achieving higher confidence on the training data as it exploits the specific patterns and noise present in the training data. Our proposed approach leverages the confidence values generated by the machine learning model. These confidence values provide a probabilistic measure of the model's certainty in its predictions and can further be used to infer the membership of a given data point. Additionally, we also introduce another variant of our method that allows us to carry out this attack without knowing the ground truth(true class) of a given data point, thus offering an edge over existing label-dependent attack methods.

6/21/2024

🤯

Fundamental Limits of Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models

Eric Aubinais, Elisabeth Gassiat, Pablo Piantanida

Membership inference attacks (MIA) can reveal whether a particular data point was part of the training dataset, potentially exposing sensitive information about individuals. This article provides theoretical guarantees by exploring the fundamental statistical limitations associated with MIAs on machine learning models. More precisely, we first derive the statistical quantity that governs the effectiveness and success of such attacks. We then theoretically prove that in a non-linear regression setting with overfitting algorithms, attacks may have a high probability of success. Finally, we investigate several situations for which we provide bounds on this quantity of interest. Interestingly, our findings indicate that discretizing the data might enhance the algorithm's security. Specifically, it is demonstrated to be limited by a constant, which quantifies the diversity of the underlying data distribution. We illustrate those results through two simple simulations.

6/12/2024