Range Membership Inference Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Range membership inference attacks aim to determine if a given data point belongs to the training dataset of a machine learning model.
- These attacks can have significant privacy implications, as they can reveal sensitive information about individuals in the training data.
- The paper explores the fundamental limits and effectiveness of range membership inference attacks against various machine learning models.
Plain English Explanation
Range membership inference attacks are a type of privacy attack that can be used to determine whether a particular data point was part of the training dataset for a machine learning model. This is significant because the training data may contain sensitive or personal information about individuals. If an attacker can determine that a data point was part of the training dataset, they may be able to infer additional details about the individual associated with that data point.
The paper looks at the limits and effectiveness of these range membership inference attacks across different types of machine learning models. It aims to understand how powerful these attacks can be and what factors influence their success. This is important for helping machine learning practitioners develop more robust and privacy-preserving models.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides an overview of membership inference attacks, which are a broader class of attacks that aim to determine whether a data point was part of a model's training dataset. It then focuses specifically on range membership inference attacks, which try to infer whether a data point falls within the range of values seen in the training data.
The authors conduct experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of range membership inference attacks against different types of machine learning models, including time series models and large language models. They explore factors such as the size of the training dataset, the model's complexity, and the attacker's access to information about the model.
The results show that range membership inference attacks can be highly effective, even against models that have been trained on large datasets. The authors also identify strategies that can help mitigate the impact of these attacks, such as using differential privacy techniques during model training.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of range membership inference attacks, highlighting their potential impact on the privacy of individuals whose data is used to train machine learning models. However, the authors acknowledge that their experiments were conducted in a controlled setting and that real-world attacks may face additional challenges or constraints.
One area for further research could be exploring the effectiveness of these attacks in more realistic scenarios, such as when the attacker has limited access to information about the model or the training data. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical implications of these attacks and the broader societal impact of such privacy breaches.
Conclusion
The paper demonstrates the significant privacy risks posed by range membership inference attacks, which can compromise the sensitive information of individuals whose data is used to train machine learning models. The findings highlight the importance of developing robust privacy-preserving techniques to ensure the responsible and ethical development of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Range Membership Inference Attacks
Jiashu Tao, Reza Shokri
Machine learning models can leak private information about their training data, but the standard methods to measure this risk, based on membership inference attacks (MIAs), have a major limitation. They only check if a given data point textit{exactly} matches a training point, neglecting the potential of similar or partially overlapping data revealing the same private information. To address this issue, we introduce the class of range membership inference attacks (RaMIAs), testing if the model was trained on any data in a specified range (defined based on the semantics of privacy). We formulate the RaMIAs game and design a principled statistical test for its complex hypotheses. We show that RaMIAs can capture privacy loss more accurately and comprehensively than MIAs on various types of data, such as tabular, image, and language. RaMIA paves the way for a more comprehensive and meaningful privacy auditing of machine learning algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
🤯
0
Fundamental Limits of Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models
Eric Aubinais, Elisabeth Gassiat, Pablo Piantanida
Membership inference attacks (MIA) can reveal whether a particular data point was part of the training dataset, potentially exposing sensitive information about individuals. This article provides theoretical guarantees by exploring the fundamental statistical limitations associated with MIAs on machine learning models. More precisely, we first derive the statistical quantity that governs the effectiveness and success of such attacks. We then theoretically prove that in a non-linear regression setting with overfitting algorithms, attacks may have a high probability of success. Finally, we investigate several situations for which we provide bounds on this quantity of interest. Interestingly, our findings indicate that discretizing the data might enhance the algorithm's security. Specifically, it is demonstrated to be limited by a constant, which quantifies the diversity of the underlying data distribution. We illustrate those results through two simple simulations.
Read more6/12/2024
🤯
0
Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks
Sajjad Zarifzadeh, Philippe Liu, Reza Shokri
Membership inference attacks aim to detect if a particular data point was used in training a model. We design a novel statistical test to perform robust membership inference attacks (RMIA) with low computational overhead. We achieve this by a fine-grained modeling of the null hypothesis in our likelihood ratio tests, and effectively leveraging both reference models and reference population data samples. RMIA has superior test power compared with prior methods, throughout the TPR-FPR curve (even at extremely low FPR, as low as 0). Under computational constraints, where only a limited number of pre-trained reference models (as few as 1) are available, and also when we vary other elements of the attack (e.g., data distribution), our method performs exceptionally well, unlike prior attacks that approach random guessing. RMIA lays the groundwork for practical yet accurate data privacy risk assessment in machine learning.
Read more6/13/2024
🤯
0
Membership Inference Attacks Against Time-Series Models
Noam Koren, Abigail Goldsteen, Ariel Farkash, Guy Amit
Analyzing time-series data that may contain personal information, particularly in the medical field, presents serious privacy concerns. Sensitive health data from patients is often used to train machine-learning models for diagnostics and ongoing care. Assessing the privacy risk of such models is crucial to making knowledgeable decisions on whether to use a model in production, share it with third parties, or deploy it in patients homes. Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) are a key method for this kind of evaluation, however time-series prediction models have not been thoroughly studied in this context. We explore existing MIA techniques on time-series models, and introduce new features, focusing on the seasonality and trend components of the data. Seasonality is estimated using a multivariate Fourier transform, and a low-degree polynomial is used to approximate trends. We applied these techniques to various types of time-series models, using datasets from the health domain. Our results demonstrate that these new features enhance the effectiveness of MIAs in identifying membership, improving the understanding of privacy risks in medical data applications.
Read more7/4/2024