Imperfect-Recall Games: Equilibrium Concepts and Their Complexity
0
🔍
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates optimal decision-making under imperfect recall, where an agent forgets information it once held.
- It analyzes the computational complexities of finding equilibria in multiplayer settings across three different solution concepts: Nash, multiselves based on evidential decision theory (EDT), and multiselves based on causal decision theory (CDT).
- The paper considers special cases, such as single-player games, two-player zero-sum games, and games without exogenous stochasticity.
- The problems are related to complexity classes like P, PPAD, PLS, $Sigma_2^P$, $exists$R, and $exists forall$R.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a concept called "imperfect recall," where an agent or decision-maker forgets information they previously had. This can happen in scenarios like the "absentminded driver game" or team games with limited communication.
The researchers investigate how to find the best decisions in these types of situations, across different mathematical models or "solution concepts." They look at three main approaches: Nash equilibrium, a model based on evidential decision theory (EDT), and a model based on causal decision theory (CDT).
The paper also considers some special cases, like single-player games, two-player zero-sum games (where one player's gain is the other's loss), and games without any random chance events. The researchers connect these problems to complexity classes in computer science, which help understand how difficult it is to solve them.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the computational complexity of finding equilibria in multiplayer extensive-form games with imperfect recall. The authors analyze three different solution concepts: Nash equilibrium, multiselves based on evidential decision theory (EDT), and multiselves based on causal decision theory (CDT).
As special cases, the paper considers (1) single-player games, (2) two-player zero-sum games and their relationship to maximin values, and (3) games without exogenous stochasticity (chance nodes). The researchers relate these problems to complexity classes such as P, PPAD, PLS, $Sigma_2^P$, $exists$R, and $exists forall$R, which help characterize the difficulty of finding exact or approximate solutions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the computational complexity involved in finding equilibria in games with imperfect recall. However, it does not delve into the practical implications or real-world applications of these findings. The complexity classes mentioned may be unfamiliar to a general audience, and the paper could benefit from more intuitive explanations or examples to illustrate the significance of the results.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the research, such as the assumptions made or the generalizability of the findings. Further research could explore the impact of relaxing some of these assumptions or consider how the results might change in more realistic or complex game scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive technical analysis of the computational complexities involved in finding equilibria in games with imperfect recall. By relating these problems to well-defined complexity classes, the researchers provide a deeper understanding of the inherent challenges in optimal decision-making under limited information. While the technical details may be challenging for a general audience, the core insights could have important implications for fields like economics, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence, where agents often operate with incomplete knowledge or memory.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
0
Imperfect-Recall Games: Equilibrium Concepts and Their Complexity
Emanuel Tewolde, Brian Hu Zhang, Caspar Oesterheld, Manolis Zampetakis, Tuomas Sandholm, Paul W. Goldberg, Vincent Conitzer
We investigate optimal decision making under imperfect recall, that is, when an agent forgets information it once held before. An example is the absentminded driver game, as well as team games in which the members have limited communication capabilities. In the framework of extensive-form games with imperfect recall, we analyze the computational complexities of finding equilibria in multiplayer settings across three different solution concepts: Nash, multiselves based on evidential decision theory (EDT), and multiselves based on causal decision theory (CDT). We are interested in both exact and approximate solution computation. As special cases, we consider (1) single-player games, (2) two-player zero-sum games and relationships to maximin values, and (3) games without exogenous stochasticity (chance nodes). We relate these problems to the complexity classes P, PPAD, PLS, $Sigma_2^P$ , $exists$R, and $exists forall$R.
Read more6/26/2024
🤿
0
The complexity of approximate (coarse) correlated equilibrium for incomplete information games
Binghui Peng, Aviad Rubinstein
We study the iteration complexity of decentralized learning of approximate correlated equilibria in incomplete information games. On the negative side, we prove that in $mathit{extensive}$-$mathit{form}$ $mathit{games}$, assuming $mathsf{PPAD} notsubset mathsf{TIME}(n^{mathsf{polylog}(n)})$, any polynomial-time learning algorithms must take at least $2^{log_2^{1-o(1)}(|mathcal{I}|)}$ iterations to converge to the set of $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibrium, where $|mathcal{I}|$ is the number of nodes in the game and $epsilon > 0$ is an absolute constant. This nearly matches, up to the $o(1)$ term, the algorithms of [PR'24, DDFG'24] for learning $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibrium, and resolves an open question of Anagnostides, Kalavasis, Sandholm, and Zampetakis [AKSZ'24]. Our lower bound holds even for the easier solution concept of $epsilon$-approximate $mathit{coarse}$ correlated equilibrium On the positive side, we give uncoupled dynamics that reach $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibria of a $mathit{Bayesian}$ $mathit{game}$ in polylogarithmic iterations, without any dependence of the number of types. This demonstrates a separation between Bayesian games and extensive-form games.
Read more6/5/2024
📊
0
Opponent Modeling in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games
Sam Ganzfried, Kevin A. Wang, Max Chiswick
In many real-world settings agents engage in strategic interactions with multiple opposing agents who can employ a wide variety of strategies. The standard approach for designing agents for such settings is to compute or approximate a relevant game-theoretic solution concept such as Nash equilibrium and then follow the prescribed strategy. However, such a strategy ignores any observations of opponents' play, which may indicate shortcomings that can be exploited. We present an approach for opponent modeling in multiplayer imperfect-information games where we collect observations of opponents' play through repeated interactions. We run experiments against a wide variety of real opponents and exact Nash equilibrium strategies in three-player Kuhn poker and show that our algorithm significantly outperforms all of the agents, including the exact Nash equilibrium strategies.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Polynomial-time Approximation Scheme for Equilibriums of Games
Hongbo Sun, Chongkun Xia, Junbo Tan, Bo Yuan, Xueqian Wang, Bin Liang
Whether a PTAS (polynomial-time approximation scheme) exists for game equilibriums has been an open question, and the absence of this polynomial-time algorithm has indications and consequences in three fields, such as the practicality of methods in algorithmic game theory, non-stationarity and curse of multiagency in MARL (multi-agent reinforcement learning), and the tractability of PPAD in computational complexity theory. In this paper, we introduce a geometric object called equilibrium bundle, which leads to a fundamental leap in the understanding of game equilibriums. Regarding the equilibrium bundle, first, we formalize perfect equilibriums of dynamic games as the zero points of its canonical section, second, we formalize a hybrid iteration of dynamic programming and interior point method as a line search on it, such that the method is an FPTAS (fully PTAS) for any perfect equilibrium of any dynamic game, implying PPAD=FP, third, we give the existence and oddness theorems of it as an extension of those of Nash equilibriums. As intermediate results, we introduce a concept called policy cone to give the sufficient and necessary condition for dynamic programming to converge to perfect equilibriums, and introduce two concepts called unbiased barrier problem and unbiased KKT conditions to make the interior point method to approximate Nash equilibriums. In experiment, the line search process is animated, and the method is tested on 2000 randomly generated dynamic games where it converges to a perfect equilibrium in every single case.
Read more9/10/2024