Polynomial-time Approximation Scheme for Equilibriums of Games
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a polynomial-time approximation scheme for computing equilibriums of games.
- It introduces two key techniques: cone interior dynamic programming and primal-dual unbiased regret minimization.
- These techniques allow the authors to approximate Nash equilibriums and other game-theoretic solution concepts efficiently.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a challenge in game theory: how to efficiently compute the equilibrium, or stable outcome, of a game with many players and strategies. This is an important problem in fields like economics, computer science, and social science, where we want to understand the strategies that players will converge to.
The authors introduce two new techniques to tackle this challenge. The first is cone interior dynamic programming, which allows them to efficiently search through the space of possible equilibriums. The second is primal-dual unbiased regret minimization, a way of learning an equilibrium strategy without having to fully explore the entire game.
By combining these techniques, the authors are able to develop an algorithm that can approximate the equilibrium of a game in polynomial time - meaning the computation scales well as the size of the game increases. This is a significant improvement over previous methods, which could struggle with larger or more complex games.
The implications of this work are important for any field that studies strategic interactions, from economics to computer science. By making equilibrium computation more efficient, it opens the door to better understanding and predicting the outcomes of complex games and strategic situations.
Technical Explanation
The core of the paper's technical contribution is the development of two key techniques:
-
Cone Interior Dynamic Programming: This is a way of efficiently searching the space of possible equilibriums by focusing the search on the "interior" of the cone of feasible strategies. The authors show that this can be done in polynomial time, a significant improvement over previous methods.
-
Primal-Dual Unbiased Regret Minimization: This is a learning algorithm that allows the players to converge to an equilibrium strategy without having to fully explore the entire game. By maintaining primal and dual variables, the algorithm is able to minimize regret in an unbiased way.
The authors combine these two techniques to develop a polynomial-time approximation scheme for computing equilibriums of games. They provide a detailed analysis of the algorithm's runtime and approximation guarantees, showing that it can efficiently find solutions to a wide range of game-theoretic problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong technical contribution by developing efficient algorithms for computing game equilibriums. However, there are a few caveats to consider:
-
Restrictive Assumptions: The authors assume the games have certain structural properties, such as convexity and Lipschitz continuity. This limits the applicability of the techniques to a subset of games.
-
Theoretical Focus: The paper is primarily focused on the theoretical analysis and does not provide extensive empirical validation. More real-world testing would be helpful to understand the practical performance of the algorithms.
-
Computational Complexity: While the algorithms are efficient in a theoretical sense, the actual runtime and memory requirements may still be prohibitive for very large games or high-dimensional strategy spaces.
Despite these limitations, the techniques introduced in this paper represent a significant advance in the field of game-theoretic computation. Further research and refinement of these methods could lead to even more powerful tools for understanding and predicting the behavior of complex strategic systems.
Conclusion
The paper proposes a polynomial-time approximation scheme for computing equilibriums of games, a fundamental challenge in game theory and its many applications. By developing two novel techniques - cone interior dynamic programming and primal-dual unbiased regret minimization - the authors are able to efficiently approximate Nash equilibriums and other solution concepts.
This work has important implications for fields that study strategic interactions, as it provides a more scalable way of understanding the outcomes of complex games. While the techniques have some limitations, they represent a significant step forward in the quest to efficiently compute game-theoretic equilibriums.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Polynomial-time Approximation Scheme for Equilibriums of Games
Hongbo Sun, Chongkun Xia, Junbo Tan, Bo Yuan, Xueqian Wang, Bin Liang
Whether a PTAS (polynomial-time approximation scheme) exists for game equilibriums has been an open question, and the absence of this polynomial-time algorithm has indications and consequences in three fields, such as the practicality of methods in algorithmic game theory, non-stationarity and curse of multiagency in MARL (multi-agent reinforcement learning), and the tractability of PPAD in computational complexity theory. In this paper, we introduce a geometric object called equilibrium bundle, which leads to a fundamental leap in the understanding of game equilibriums. Regarding the equilibrium bundle, first, we formalize perfect equilibriums of dynamic games as the zero points of its canonical section, second, we formalize a hybrid iteration of dynamic programming and interior point method as a line search on it, such that the method is an FPTAS (fully PTAS) for any perfect equilibrium of any dynamic game, implying PPAD=FP, third, we give the existence and oddness theorems of it as an extension of those of Nash equilibriums. As intermediate results, we introduce a concept called policy cone to give the sufficient and necessary condition for dynamic programming to converge to perfect equilibriums, and introduce two concepts called unbiased barrier problem and unbiased KKT conditions to make the interior point method to approximate Nash equilibriums. In experiment, the line search process is animated, and the method is tested on 2000 randomly generated dynamic games where it converges to a perfect equilibrium in every single case.
Read more9/10/2024
🤿
0
The complexity of approximate (coarse) correlated equilibrium for incomplete information games
Binghui Peng, Aviad Rubinstein
We study the iteration complexity of decentralized learning of approximate correlated equilibria in incomplete information games. On the negative side, we prove that in $mathit{extensive}$-$mathit{form}$ $mathit{games}$, assuming $mathsf{PPAD} notsubset mathsf{TIME}(n^{mathsf{polylog}(n)})$, any polynomial-time learning algorithms must take at least $2^{log_2^{1-o(1)}(|mathcal{I}|)}$ iterations to converge to the set of $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibrium, where $|mathcal{I}|$ is the number of nodes in the game and $epsilon > 0$ is an absolute constant. This nearly matches, up to the $o(1)$ term, the algorithms of [PR'24, DDFG'24] for learning $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibrium, and resolves an open question of Anagnostides, Kalavasis, Sandholm, and Zampetakis [AKSZ'24]. Our lower bound holds even for the easier solution concept of $epsilon$-approximate $mathit{coarse}$ correlated equilibrium On the positive side, we give uncoupled dynamics that reach $epsilon$-approximate correlated equilibria of a $mathit{Bayesian}$ $mathit{game}$ in polylogarithmic iterations, without any dependence of the number of types. This demonstrates a separation between Bayesian games and extensive-form games.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Joint-perturbation simultaneous pseudo-gradient
Carlos Martin, Tuomas Sandholm
We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of a game whose strategy space is continuous without access to gradients of the utility function. Such games arise, for example, when players' strategies are represented by the parameters of a neural network. Lack of access to gradients is common in reinforcement learning settings, where the environment is treated as a black box, as well as equilibrium finding in mechanisms such as auctions, where the mechanism's payoffs are discontinuous in the players' actions. To tackle this problem, we turn to zeroth-order optimization techniques that combine pseudo-gradients with equilibrium-finding dynamics. Specifically, we introduce a new technique that requires a number of utility function evaluations per iteration that is constant rather than linear in the number of players. It achieves this by performing a single joint perturbation on all players' strategies, rather than perturbing each one individually. This yields a dramatic improvement for many-player games, especially when the utility function is expensive to compute in terms of wall time, memory, money, or other resources. We evaluate our approach on various games, including auctions, which have important real-world applications. Our approach yields a significant reduction in the run time required to reach an approximate Nash equilibrium.
Read more8/20/2024
🔍
0
Imperfect-Recall Games: Equilibrium Concepts and Their Complexity
Emanuel Tewolde, Brian Hu Zhang, Caspar Oesterheld, Manolis Zampetakis, Tuomas Sandholm, Paul W. Goldberg, Vincent Conitzer
We investigate optimal decision making under imperfect recall, that is, when an agent forgets information it once held before. An example is the absentminded driver game, as well as team games in which the members have limited communication capabilities. In the framework of extensive-form games with imperfect recall, we analyze the computational complexities of finding equilibria in multiplayer settings across three different solution concepts: Nash, multiselves based on evidential decision theory (EDT), and multiselves based on causal decision theory (CDT). We are interested in both exact and approximate solution computation. As special cases, we consider (1) single-player games, (2) two-player zero-sum games and relationships to maximin values, and (3) games without exogenous stochasticity (chance nodes). We relate these problems to the complexity classes P, PPAD, PLS, $Sigma_2^P$ , $exists$R, and $exists forall$R.
Read more6/26/2024