Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using Common Crawl

Read original: arXiv:2404.09770 - Published 4/16/2024 by Henry S. Thompson
Total Score

0

Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using Common Crawl

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an improved methodology for conducting longitudinal web analytics using the Common Crawl dataset.
  • The researchers developed a novel approach to address limitations in prior methods, enabling more robust and reliable analysis of web content over time.
  • The paper describes the key components of the methodology, including a URL index, a versioned snapshot dataset, and a set of analytical tools.
  • The authors validate their approach through extensive experiments and demonstrate its effectiveness for various web analytics tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on improving how researchers and analysts can study the evolution of web content over time. Traditionally, this type of "longitudinal web analytics" has been challenging due to the limitations of available datasets and analysis methods.

To address this, the researchers developed a new system that builds on the Common Crawl dataset - a large, open-source archive of web pages collected over many years. Their methodology creates an index of web page URLs, a set of versioned snapshots of the web content, and tools for analyzing how websites and online information have changed over time.

This allows researchers to more accurately track how the web has evolved, identify trends, and study important phenomena like the spread of misinformation or the emergence of new technologies. By overcoming limitations in prior approaches, this new methodology provides a more robust foundation for conducting meaningful longitudinal web analytics.

Technical Explanation

The key components of the improved longitudinal web analytics methodology are:

  1. URL Index: The researchers created a comprehensive index of web page URLs, mapping each URL to the specific crawls in which it appeared over time. This overcomes issues with unstable URLs in prior approaches.

  2. Versioned Snapshot Dataset: The researchers assembled a set of versioned snapshots of web content, each representing a distinct crawl of the web. This allows for direct comparison of web pages across different time periods.

  3. Analytical Tools: The paper describes a suite of analytical tools built on top of the URL index and versioned snapshots. These enable researchers to track changes in web content, identify emerging trends, and conduct a wide range of longitudinal analyses.

The authors validated their methodology through extensive experiments, demonstrating its effectiveness for tasks like analyzing misinformation resilience, studying scaling laws in data curation, and benchmarking language model alignment. The results show that this new approach significantly improves the quality and reliability of longitudinal web analytics compared to prior methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges some limitations of the proposed methodology, such as the potential for biases in the underlying Common Crawl dataset and challenges in accurately tracking content changes for dynamic web pages. The authors also note that further research is needed to explore the application of their techniques to other web-related datasets and analytics tasks.

While the methodology represents a substantial improvement over prior approaches, there may be additional areas for refinement or expansion. For example, the integration of other web archives or the development of more sophisticated change detection algorithms could further enhance the capabilities of this longitudinal web analytics system.

Overall, the paper presents a well-designed and validated solution to a significant problem in web research and analysis. By addressing key limitations in existing methods, this work provides a more robust foundation for understanding how the web and online information evolve over time, which can have important implications for a wide range of applications and domains.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an improved methodology for conducting longitudinal web analytics using the Common Crawl dataset. The researchers developed a comprehensive system that includes a URL index, versioned web content snapshots, and analytical tools to enable more reliable and insightful tracking of how the web has changed over time.

The validation experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach for a variety of web analytics tasks, highlighting its potential to significantly advance research and understanding in areas like misinformation resilience, data curation, and language model alignment. By overcoming limitations in prior methods, this work provides a more robust foundation for longitudinal analysis of web content and dynamics, with important implications for both academic research and real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using Common Crawl
Total Score

0

Improved methodology for longitudinal Web analytics using Common Crawl

Henry S. Thompson

Common Crawl is a multi-petabyte longitudinal dataset containing over 100 billion web pages which is widely used as a source of language data for sequence model training and in web science research. Each of its constituent archives is on the order of 75TB in size. Using it for research, particularly longitudinal studies, which necessarily involve multiple archives, is therefore very expensive in terms of compute time and storage space and/or web bandwidth. Two new methods for mitigating this problem are presented here, based on exploiting and extending the much smaller (<200 gigabytes (GB) compressed) _index_ which is available for each archive. By adding Last-Modified timestamps to the index we enable longitudinal exploration using only a single archive. By comparing the distribution of index features for each of the 100 segments into which archive is divided with their distribution over the whole archive, we have identified the least and most representative segments for a number of recent archives. Using this allows the segment(s) that are most representative of an archive to be used as proxies for the whole. We illustrate this approach in an analysis of changes in URI length over time, leading to an unanticipated insight into the how the creation of Web pages has changed over time.

Read more

4/16/2024

Quantifying Geospatial in the Common Crawl Corpus
Total Score

0

Quantifying Geospatial in the Common Crawl Corpus

Ilya Ilyankou, Meihui Wang, Stefano Cavazzi, James Haworth

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit emerging geospatial capabilities, stemming from their pre-training on vast unlabelled text datasets that are often derived from the Common Crawl (CC) corpus. However, the geospatial content within CC remains largely unexplored, impacting our understanding of LLMs' spatial reasoning. This paper investigates the prevalence of geospatial data in recent Common Crawl releases using Gemini 1.5, a powerful language model. By analyzing a sample of documents and manually revising the results, we estimate that 18.7% of web documents in CC contain geospatial information such as coordinates and addresses. We find little difference in prevalence between Enlgish- and non-English-language documents. Our findings provide quantitative insights into the nature and extent of geospatial data in CC, and lay the groundwork for future studies of geospatial biases of LLMs.

Read more

8/30/2024

CC-GPX: Extracting High-Quality Annotated Geospatial Data from Common Crawl
Total Score

0

CC-GPX: Extracting High-Quality Annotated Geospatial Data from Common Crawl

Ilya Ilyankou, Meihui Wang, Stefano Cavazzi, James Haworth

The Common Crawl (CC) corpus is the largest open web crawl dataset containing 9.5+ petabytes of data captured since 2008. The dataset is instrumental in training large language models, and as such it has been studied for (un)desirable content, and distilled for smaller, domain-specific datasets. However, to our knowledge, no research has been dedicated to using CC as a source of annotated geospatial data. In this paper, we introduce an efficient pipeline to extract annotated user-generated tracks from GPX files found in CC, and the resulting multimodal dataset with 1,416 pairings of human-written descriptions and MultiLineString vector data from the 6 most recent CC releases. The dataset can be used to study people's outdoor activity patterns, the way people talk about their outdoor experiences, as well as for developing trajectory generation or track annotation models, or for various other problems in place of synthetically generated routes. Our reproducible code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/ilyankou/cc-gpx

Read more

8/30/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Smart Bilingual Focused Crawling of Parallel Documents

Cristian Garc'ia-Romero, Miquel Espl`a-Gomis, Felipe S'anchez-Mart'inez

Crawling parallel texts $unicode{x2014}$texts that are mutual translations$unicode{x2014}$ from the Internet is usually done following a brute-force approach: documents are massively downloaded in an unguided process, and only a fraction of them end up leading to actual parallel content. In this work we propose a smart crawling method that guides the crawl towards finding parallel content more rapidly. Our approach builds on two different models: one that infers the language of a document from its URL, and another that infers whether a pair of URLs link to parallel documents. We evaluate both models in isolation and their integration into a crawling tool. The results demonstrate the individual effectiveness of both models and highlight that their combination enables the early discovery of parallel content during crawling, leading to a reduction in the amount of downloaded documents deemed useless, and yielding a greater quantity of parallel documents compared to conventional crawling approaches.

Read more

5/24/2024