Improving Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions with Overgenerate-and-rank

Overview

• The paper explores a method for automatically generating high-quality distractors (incorrect answer choices) for math multiple-choice questions (MCQs).
• MCQs are widely used in math education, but generating effective distractors is challenging, especially at scale.
• The proposed "overgenerate-and-rank" approach uses a language model to generate a large set of potential distractors, then trains a ranking model to identify the most plausible ones.
• Experiments on real-world data and human evaluation with math teachers show that the ranked distractors are more aligned with human-authored ones, though the human-authored distractors are still preferred.

Plain English Explanation

Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a common way to test students' math knowledge, as they can be easily graded at a large scale. A key part of MCQs is the "distractors" - the incorrect answer choices that are designed to reflect common student mistakes or misconceptions.

Generating high-quality distractors can be challenging, especially when done automatically using large language models. In this paper, the researchers propose a new method to improve the distractors generated by language models.

Their approach is to "overgenerate" a large number of potential distractors, then use a separate "ranking" model to identify the most plausible ones. This way, the language model can quickly produce a wide range of options, and the ranking model can select the ones that are most likely to fool real students, based on patterns in existing human-created distractors.

The researchers tested this method on real-world data and had math teachers evaluate the results. They found that the ranked distractors were more aligned with the human-authored ones, even though the teachers still preferred the human-created options overall. This suggests the automated approach can be a useful tool to help teachers create high-quality MCQs, even if it doesn't fully match human performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel "overgenerate-and-rank" approach to automatically generating high-quality distractors for math multiple-choice questions (MCQs). The key components are:

1. Distractor Overgeneration: A large language model is used to quickly generate a large pool of potential distractors for a given math question.

2. Distractor Ranking: A separate ranking model is trained to predict how likely each generated distractor is to be selected by real students, based on patterns in existing human-authored distractors. This allows filtering the overgenerated options to identify the most plausible ones.

The researchers evaluated this approach on a real-world dataset of math MCQs. They found that the ranked distractors generated by their method showed greater alignment with human-authored distractors, as measured by overlap and human evaluation. However, the human-authored distractors were still preferred overall, indicating there is room for improvement in the automated approach.

The paper also discusses limitations and areas for future work, such as incorporating more explicit math reasoning and using human feedback to iteratively refine the ranking model.

Critical Analysis

The researchers present a promising approach to address the challenge of automatically generating high-quality distractors for math MCQs. The "overgenerate-and-rank" method leverages the strengths of language models while using a separate ranking model to filter the outputs and align them better with human-authored distractors.

One key limitation noted in the paper is that the human-authored distractors are still preferred over the automatically generated ones, even after ranking. This suggests there are aspects of effective distractor design that the current approach does not fully capture. Further research may be needed to better understand the cognitive and pedagogical principles behind high-quality distractors.

Additionally, the paper focuses on generating distractors for math MCQs, but the approach could potentially be extended to other domains, such as reading comprehension or instruction-following tasks. Exploring the broader applicability of the method could be an interesting direction for future work.

Overall, this research represents a meaningful step towards more effective automated generation of MCQ distractors, with potential benefits for math education at scale. Continued refinement and evaluation of the approach could lead to further improvements in this important area.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel "overgenerate-and-rank" method for automatically generating high-quality distractors for math multiple-choice questions (MCQs). By leveraging language models to quickly produce a wide range of potential distractors, and then using a separate ranking model to identify the most plausible options, the researchers were able to create distractors that more closely aligned with human-authored ones.

While the human-authored distractors were still preferred, the automated approach shows promise as a tool to assist teachers in creating effective MCQs at scale. Further research may be needed to better understand the cognitive and pedagogical factors that contribute to high-quality distractors, and to explore the broader applicability of the overgenerate-and-rank method beyond the math domain.

Overall, this work represents a meaningful step forward in the challenge of automating the generation of high-quality multiple-choice question distractors, which could have important implications for math education and assessment.