DCR: Divide-and-Conquer Reasoning for Multi-choice Question Answering with LLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a "divide and conquer" approach to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).
- The key idea is to break down complex reasoning tasks into smaller, more manageable subproblems that can be solved more effectively by LLMs.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a range of reasoning tasks, including multi-step math word problems and logical inference problems.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, they can struggle with complex reasoning tasks that require step-by-step problem-solving. This paper explores a technique called "divide and conquer" to help LLMs reason more effectively.
The basic idea is to break down a complex reasoning problem into smaller, more manageable subproblems. This makes it easier for the LLM to understand and solve each part of the problem. For example, if you need to solve a multi-step math word problem, you could first have the LLM identify the relevant information, then set up the equations, and finally solve the equations.
By breaking down the problem in this way, the LLM can focus on one piece at a time, rather than trying to tackle the entire problem at once. This can lead to significantly better performance on complex reasoning tasks compared to having the LLM try to solve the entire problem in one go.
The authors of this paper demonstrate the effectiveness of this divide and conquer approach on a range of reasoning tasks, including math word problems and logical inference problems. They show that LLMs can achieve much higher accuracy when the problem is broken down into smaller steps.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the use of a "divide and conquer" approach to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The authors hypothesize that complex reasoning tasks can be more effectively solved by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable subproblems.
To test this, the authors developed a multi-step reasoning framework that consists of three main components:
- Problem Decomposition: This module takes the original problem and breaks it down into a sequence of simpler subproblems.
- Subproblem Solving: Each subproblem is then solved independently using an LLM-based solver.
- Solution Composition: The solutions to the subproblems are combined to generate the final solution to the original problem.
The authors evaluated this framework on a range of reasoning tasks, including multi-step math word problems and logical inference problems. They found that the divide and conquer approach significantly outperformed LLMs that were trained to solve the entire problem in one go.
This work builds on previous research on improving the reasoning abilities of LLMs, such as the use of task decomposition and hierarchical policy learning. However, the authors argue that their divide and conquer approach is a more general and effective strategy for enhancing LLM reasoning.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the divide and conquer approach is that it relies on the ability to accurately decompose the original problem into appropriate subproblems. If the problem decomposition is not done correctly, the performance of the overall system may suffer. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest that future work could explore more sophisticated problem decomposition techniques.
Additionally, the authors note that their experiments were conducted on a relatively narrow set of reasoning tasks. It remains to be seen how well the divide and conquer approach would generalize to a broader range of reasoning problems, especially those that may require more complex reasoning or domain-specific knowledge.
Another potential issue is the potential for the divide and conquer approach to introduce biases or inconsistencies in the final solution, as the subproblems are solved independently. The authors do not address this concern in the paper, and further research may be needed to understand and mitigate these sorts of issues.
Overall, this paper presents a promising approach to enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. The divide and conquer strategy offers a principled way to tackle complex reasoning tasks, and the authors have demonstrated its effectiveness on a range of benchmark problems. However, further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader applicability of this technique.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a "divide and conquer" approach to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). By breaking down complex reasoning tasks into smaller, more manageable subproblems, the authors show that LLMs can achieve significantly better performance compared to trying to solve the entire problem at once.
The key contributions of this work are the development of a multi-step reasoning framework that includes problem decomposition, subproblem solving, and solution composition, as well as the empirical demonstration of the effectiveness of this approach on a range of reasoning tasks.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs, which have traditionally struggled with complex, multi-step problems. [The divide and conquer strategy offers a promising direction for future work in this area, with potential applications in domains such as automated distractor generation, conversational recommendation systems, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DCR: Divide-and-Conquer Reasoning for Multi-choice Question Answering with LLMs
Zijie Meng, Yan Zhang, Zhaopeng Feng, Zuozhu Liu
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in reasoning benchmarks with the emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT), particularly in multi-choice question (MCQ). However, current works equally resolve questions regardless of the problem-solving difficulty, leading to an excessive focus on simple items while insufficient attention on intricate ones. To address this challenge, we propose a simple yet effective strategy, Divide and Conquer Reasoning (DCR), to enhance the reasoning capability of LLMs for MCQs, as inspired by human beings using heuristics to first categorize tasks and then handle them separately. In particular, we first categorize questions into two subsets based on confidence score ($mathcal{CS}$), which is estimated by statistical frequency of generated answers. Subsequently, we propose Filter Choices based Reasoning (FCR) to improve model performance on MCQs with low ($mathcal{CS}$). Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed strategy only costs 85% of SOTA, while still achieves average accuracy improvement of 1.56% across nine datasets including arithmetic, commonsense, and logic reasoning tasks. The code is at url{https://github.com/AiMijie/Divide-and-Conquer}
Read more4/4/2024
📊
0
Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought
Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ben Bogin, Uri Katz, Daniel Deutch, Jonathan Berant
Modern systems for multi-hop question answering (QA) typically break questions into a sequence of reasoning steps, termed chain-of-thought (CoT), before arriving at a final answer. Often, multiple chains are sampled and aggregated through a voting mechanism over the final answers, but the intermediate steps themselves are discarded. While such approaches improve performance, they do not consider the relations between intermediate steps across chains and do not provide a unified explanation for the predicted answer. We introduce Multi-Chain Reasoning (MCR), an approach which prompts large language models to meta-reason over multiple chains of thought, rather than aggregating their answers. MCR examines different reasoning chains, mixes information between them and selects the most relevant facts in generating an explanation and predicting the answer. MCR outperforms strong baselines on 7 multi-hop QA datasets. Moreover, our analysis reveals that MCR explanations exhibit high quality, enabling humans to verify its answers.
Read more8/6/2024
💬
28
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
Read more5/21/2024
0
MDCR: A Dataset for Multi-Document Conditional Reasoning
Peter Baile Chen, Yi Zhang, Chunwei Liu, Sejal Gupta, Yoon Kim, Michael Cafarella
The same real-life questions posed to different individuals may lead to different answers based on their unique situations. For instance, whether a student is eligible for a scholarship depends on eligibility conditions, such as major or degree required. ConditionalQA was proposed to evaluate models' capability of reading a document and answering eligibility questions, considering unmentioned conditions. However, it is limited to questions on single documents, neglecting harder cases that may require cross-document reasoning and optimization, for example, What is the maximum number of scholarships attainable? Such questions over multiple documents are not only more challenging due to more context having to understand, but also because the model has to (1) explore all possible combinations of unmentioned conditions and (2) understand the relationship between conditions across documents, to reason about the optimal outcome. To evaluate models' capability of answering such questions, we propose a new dataset MDCR, which can reflect real-world challenges and serve as a new test bed for complex conditional reasoning that requires optimization. We evaluate this dataset using the most recent LLMs and demonstrate their limitations in solving this task. We believe this dataset will facilitate future research in answering optimization questions with unknown conditions.
Read more6/18/2024