Improving Gloss-free Sign Language Translation by Reducing Representation Density

Overview

• This paper addresses the "representation density problem" in gloss-free sign language translation (SLT) systems.
• Gloss-free SLT aims to develop well-performing SLT systems without the need for costly gloss annotations, but currently lags behind gloss-based approaches.
• The representation density problem refers to the challenge that the visual representations of semantically distinct sign gestures are closely packed together in feature space, making it difficult for gloss-free methods to distinguish different sign gestures.
• The authors introduce a contrastive learning strategy called SignCL to address this problem and improve the performance of gloss-free SLT systems.

Plain English Explanation

Sign language translation (SLT) is the process of converting sign language gestures into text or speech. Traditionally, SLT systems have relied on "gloss" annotations, which are textual descriptions of the sign gestures. However, creating these gloss annotations is a time-consuming and expensive process.

Gloss-free SLT aims to develop SLT systems that can work without the need for gloss annotations. This could make SLT more accessible and cost-effective. However, gloss-free SLT systems currently perform significantly worse than gloss-based approaches.

The key problem identified in this paper is the "representation density problem." This means that the visual representations of different sign gestures tend to be very close together in the feature space used by the SLT system. This makes it hard for the system to distinguish between different sign gestures, leading to poor performance.

To address this, the authors propose a new technique called SignCL, which is a type of "contrastive learning." Contrastive learning encourages the system to learn more distinctive and discriminative feature representations for the sign gestures. This helps the system better differentiate between different signs, leading to improved translation accuracy.

The authors show that SignCL can significantly boost the performance of various gloss-free SLT frameworks, outperforming even large-scale pre-trained models like Sign2GPT while using much fewer parameters.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is the introduction of the "representation density problem" in the context of gloss-free SLT. The authors observe that the visual representations of semantically distinct sign gestures tend to be closely packed together in the feature space used by gloss-free SLT models. This makes it challenging for these models to distinguish between different sign gestures, leading to a sharp drop in translation performance.

To address this, the authors propose a contrastive learning strategy called SignCL. SignCL encourages the SLT model to learn more discriminative feature representations in a self-supervised manner. Specifically, the model is trained to pull together the representations of sign gestures belonging to the same class (i.e., the same sign), while pushing apart the representations of sign gestures from different classes.

The authors evaluate SignCL on two gloss-free SLT frameworks: Sign Language Transformer and GFSLT-VLP. Their experiments demonstrate that SignCL can significantly reduce the representation density and improve performance, achieving a 39% and 46% increase in BLEU score on the CSL-Daily dataset, respectively.

Compared to the state-of-the-art Sign2GPT model, which leverages large-scale pre-trained vision and language models, SignCL achieves better performance while using only 35% of the parameters.

Critical Analysis

The authors have identified an important problem in the field of gloss-free SLT and proposed a novel solution to address it. The representation density problem is a valid concern that could be a significant bottleneck in the performance of gloss-free SLT systems.

One potential limitation of the paper is that the experiments are conducted on a single dataset, the CSL-Daily dataset. It would be valuable to see the performance of SignCL on additional datasets, particularly those with different characteristics or from different sign language domains, to further validate the generalizability of the approach.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much analysis or discussion on the potential reasons why the representation density problem arises in the first place. A deeper investigation into the factors that contribute to this problem could lead to more targeted solutions or help guide the development of future gloss-free SLT systems.

Finally, while the authors demonstrate impressive performance improvements, it would be useful to have a more comprehensive comparison of SignCL to other state-of-the-art gloss-free SLT methods, beyond just Sign2GPT. Comparing against a broader range of approaches could provide a more complete picture of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the SignCL technique.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to address the representation density problem in gloss-free sign language translation (SLT) systems. By introducing a contrastive learning strategy called SignCL, the authors have demonstrated significant performance improvements across multiple gloss-free SLT frameworks, outperforming even large-scale pre-trained models while using far fewer parameters.

The representation density problem is a critical challenge in the field of gloss-free SLT, and the authors' work represents an important step forward in developing well-performing SLT systems that do not rely on costly gloss annotations. The SignCL technique could potentially be applied to other areas of multimodal machine learning where distinctive feature representations are crucial for accurate modeling and prediction.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to make sign language translation more accessible and cost-effective, ultimately benefiting the deaf and hard-of-hearing communities that rely on these technologies.