Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines how AI systems documentation can improve governance outcomes
- Discusses what organizations could document about their AI systems
- Explores bridging theory and practice in AI governance
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how documenting AI systems can help improve governance and accountability. It examines what organizations could document about their AI systems, such as their purpose, capabilities, limitations, and potential risks. This documentation can help bridge the gap between the theoretical principles of AI governance and the practical deployment of AI systems. By being transparent about their AI systems, organizations can foster trust, mitigate concerns, and ensure these technologies are developed and used responsibly. The paper aims to connect the theoretical research on AI governance with the real-world implementation of AI documentation practices.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores how AI systems documentation can be leveraged to improve governance outcomes. It outlines several key elements that organizations could document about their AI systems, including the system's purpose, capabilities, limitations, potential risks, and social impact. This documentation can help bridge the gap between the theoretical principles of AI governance, such as those outlined in position papers, and the practical deployment of AI systems. By being transparent about their AI systems, organizations can foster trust, mitigate concerns, and ensure these technologies are developed and used in a responsible manner. The paper aims to connect the theoretical research on AI governance with the real-world implementation of AI documentation practices, ultimately improving governance outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of AI documentation in enhancing governance and accountability. However, it does not delve into the potential challenges or limitations of this approach. For example, the paper does not address how organizations can ensure the accuracy and completeness of their AI documentation, or how to handle cases where sensitive or proprietary information may need to be protected. Further research may be needed to explore these practical considerations and identify best practices for effective AI documentation.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the significant potential for AI documentation to improve governance outcomes by bridging the gap between theory and practice. By being transparent about the capabilities, limitations, and potential risks of their AI systems, organizations can foster trust, mitigate concerns, and ensure these technologies are developed and used responsibly. The ideas presented in this paper could have far-reaching implications for the responsible deployment of AI systems and the broader field of AI governance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice
Amy A. Winecoff, Miranda Bogen
Documentation plays a crucial role in both external accountability and internal governance of AI systems. Although there are many proposals for documenting AI data, models, systems, and methods, the ways these practices enhance governance as well as the challenges practitioners and organizations face with documentation remain underexplored. In this paper, we analyze 37 proposed documentation frameworks and 21 empirical studies evaluating their use. We identify potential hypotheses about how documentation can strengthen governance, such as informing stakeholders about AI risks and usage, fostering collaboration, encouraging ethical reflection, and reinforcing best practices. However, empirical evidence shows that practitioners often encounter obstacles that prevent documentation from achieving these goals. We also highlight key considerations for organizations when designing documentation, such as determining the appropriate level of detail and balancing automation in the process. Finally, we offer recommendations for further research and for implementing effective documentation practices in real-world contexts.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Documentation Practices of Artificial Intelligence
Stefan Arnold, Dilara Yesilbas, Rene Grobner, Dominik Riedelbauch, Maik Horn, Sven Weinzierl
Artificial Intelligence (AI) faces persistent challenges in terms of transparency and accountability, which requires rigorous documentation. Through a literature review on documentation practices, we provide an overview of prevailing trends, persistent issues, and the multifaceted interplay of factors influencing the documentation. Our examination of key characteristics such as scope, target audiences, support for multimodality, and level of automation, highlights a dynamic evolution in documentation practices, underscored by a shift towards a more holistic, engaging, and automated documentation.
Read more6/28/2024
0
AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act
Delaram Golpayegani, Isabelle Hupont, Cecilia Panigutti, Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Sven Schade, Declan O'Sullivan, Dave Lewis
With the upcoming enforcement of the EU AI Act, documentation of high-risk AI systems and their risk management information will become a legal requirement playing a pivotal role in demonstration of compliance. Despite its importance, there is a lack of standards and guidelines to assist with drawing up AI and risk documentation aligned with the AI Act. This paper aims to address this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the AI Act's provisions regarding technical documentation, wherein we particularly focus on AI risk management. On the basis of this analysis, we propose AI Cards as a novel holistic framework for representing a given intended use of an AI system by encompassing information regarding technical specifications, context of use, and risk management, both in human- and machine-readable formats. While the human-readable representation of AI Cards provides AI stakeholders with a transparent and comprehensible overview of the AI use case, its machine-readable specification leverages on state of the art Semantic Web technologies to embody the interoperability needed for exchanging documentation within the AI value chain. This brings the flexibility required for reflecting changes applied to the AI system and its context, provides the scalability needed to accommodate potential amendments to legal requirements, and enables development of automated tools to assist with legal compliance and conformity assessment tasks. To solidify the benefits, we provide an exemplar AI Card for an AI-based student proctoring system and further discuss its potential applications within and beyond the context of the AI Act.
Read more6/27/2024
0
Position Paper: Technical Research and Talent is Needed for Effective AI Governance
Anka Reuel, Lisa Soder, Ben Bucknall, Trond Arne Undheim
In light of recent advancements in AI capabilities and the increasingly widespread integration of AI systems into society, governments worldwide are actively seeking to mitigate the potential harms and risks associated with these technologies through regulation and other governance tools. However, there exist significant gaps between governance aspirations and the current state of the technical tooling necessary for their realisation. In this position paper, we survey policy documents published by public-sector institutions in the EU, US, and China to highlight specific areas of disconnect between the technical requirements necessary for enacting proposed policy actions, and the current technical state of the art. Our analysis motivates a call for tighter integration of the AI/ML research community within AI governance in order to i) catalyse technical research aimed at bridging the gap between current and supposed technical underpinnings of regulatory action, as well as ii) increase the level of technical expertise within governing institutions so as to inform and guide effective governance of AI.
Read more6/12/2024