Improving the Prediction of Individual Engagement in Recommendations Using Cognitive Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.16147 - Published 9/5/2024 by Roderick Seow, Yunfan Zhao, Duncan Wood, Milind Tambe, Cleotilde Gonzalez
Total Score

0

Improving the Prediction of Individual Engagement in Recommendations Using Cognitive Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines how cognitive models can improve the prediction of individual engagement with recommendations.
  • The researchers used instance-based learning and time-series forecasting to model how people allocate limited resources when engaging with recommendations.
  • They evaluated their approach using data on maternal health recommendations, showing it can better capture individual differences in engagement.

Plain English Explanation

The key idea of this paper is using cognitive modeling to improve how we predict whether someone will engage with a recommendation. Recommendations are suggestions that apps or websites make to users, like products to buy or articles to read. But people have limited resources like time and attention, so they don't engage with every recommendation.

The researchers tried two approaches inspired by how the human mind works. First, they used instance-based learning, which means the model learns from past examples of a person's engagement. Second, they used time-series forecasting, which means the model considers how a person's engagement changes over time.

The researchers tested this approach using data on recommendations for maternal health. They found it could better capture the individual differences in how people engage with recommendations compared to standard models. This suggests cognitive models could be a powerful way to personalize recommendations and ensure people see the content most relevant to them.

Technical Explanation

The researchers proposed a cognitive modeling approach to predict individual engagement with recommendations. They used two key techniques inspired by cognitive science:

  1. Instance-based learning: The model learns from specific past examples of a person's engagement behavior, rather than just general patterns.

  2. Time-series forecasting: The model considers how a person's engagement changes over time, rather than just looking at static features.

The researchers evaluated this approach using data on maternal health recommendations. They found the cognitive modeling approach outperformed standard recommendation models in predicting individual engagement, suggesting it can better capture the nuances of human decision-making around limited resources.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledged several limitations of their study:

  • The evaluation was limited to a single domain (maternal health), and the approach may need to be adapted for other recommendation contexts.
  • The time-series forecasting component relied on a relatively simple model, and more sophisticated time-series techniques could potentially improve performance further.
  • The study did not explore the interpretability of the cognitive models or how they could be used to generate insights about human behavior, beyond just improving predictive accuracy.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise from using cognitive models for recommendation systems. For example, the models may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases in how people engage with recommendations.

Overall, the research shows promising initial results, but more work is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of cognitive modeling for recommendation systems.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates how cognitive modeling techniques inspired by instance-based learning and time-series forecasting can improve the prediction of individual engagement with recommendations. By better capturing the nuances of human decision-making around limited resources, this approach has the potential to enable more personalized and relevant recommendation systems.

The results suggest cognitive models could be a valuable tool for optimizing recommendation systems in a wide range of domains. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach, particularly around interpretability and potential ethical concerns.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Improving the Prediction of Individual Engagement in Recommendations Using Cognitive Models
Total Score

0

Improving the Prediction of Individual Engagement in Recommendations Using Cognitive Models

Roderick Seow, Yunfan Zhao, Duncan Wood, Milind Tambe, Cleotilde Gonzalez

For public health programs with limited resources, the ability to predict how behaviors change over time and in response to interventions is crucial for deciding when and to whom interventions should be allocated. Using data from a real-world maternal health program, we demonstrate how a cognitive model based on Instance-Based Learning (IBL) Theory can augment existing purely computational approaches. Our findings show that, compared to general time-series forecasters (e.g., LSTMs), IBL models, which reflect human decision-making processes, better predict the dynamics of individuals' states. Additionally, IBL provides estimates of the volatility in individuals' states and their sensitivity to interventions, which can improve the efficiency of training of other time series models.

Read more

9/5/2024

Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning
Total Score

0

Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning

Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, Kasturi Jamale, Cleotilde Gonzalez

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their capabilities across various tasks, from language translation to complex reasoning. Understanding and predicting human behavior and biases are crucial for artificial intelligence (AI) assisted systems to provide useful assistance, yet it remains an open question whether these models can achieve this. This paper addresses this gap by leveraging the reasoning and generative capabilities of the LLMs to predict human behavior in two sequential decision-making tasks. These tasks involve balancing between exploitative and exploratory actions and handling delayed feedback, both essential for simulating real-life decision processes. We compare the performance of LLMs with a cognitive instance-based learning (IBL) model, which imitates human experiential decision-making. Our findings indicate that LLMs excel at rapidly incorporating feedback to enhance prediction accuracy. In contrast, the cognitive IBL model better accounts for human exploratory behaviors and effectively captures loss aversion bias, i.e., the tendency to choose a sub-optimal goal with fewer step-cost penalties rather than exploring to find the optimal choice, even with limited experience. The results highlight the benefits of integrating LLMs with cognitive architectures, suggesting that this synergy could enhance the modeling and understanding of complex human decision-making patterns.

Read more

7/15/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Towards Neural Network based Cognitive Models of Dynamic Decision-Making by Humans

Changyu Chen, Shashank Reddy Chirra, Maria Jos'e Ferreira, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Arunesh Sinha, Pradeep Varakantham

Modeling human cognitive processes in dynamic decision-making tasks has been an endeavor in AI for a long time because such models can help make AI systems more intuitive, personalized, mitigate any human biases, and enhance training in simulation. Some initial work has attempted to utilize neural networks (and large language models) but often assumes one common model for all humans and aims to emulate human behavior in aggregate. However, the behavior of each human is distinct, heterogeneous, and relies on specific past experiences in certain tasks. For instance, consider two individuals responding to a phishing email: one who has previously encountered and identified similar threats may recognize it quickly, while another without such experience might fall for the scam. In this work, we build on Instance Based Learning (IBL) that posits that human decisions are based on similar situations encountered in the past. However, IBL relies on simple fixed form functions to capture the mapping from past situations to current decisions. To that end, we propose two new attention-based neural network models to have open form non-linear functions to model distinct and heterogeneous human decision-making in dynamic settings. We experiment with two distinct datasets gathered from human subject experiment data, one focusing on detection of phishing email by humans and another where humans act as attackers in a cybersecurity setting and decide on an attack option. We conducted extensive experiments with our two neural network models, IBL, and GPT3.5, and demonstrate that the neural network models outperform IBL significantly in representing human decision-making, while providing similar interpretability of human decisions as IBL. Overall, our work yields promising results for further use of neural networks in cognitive modeling of human decision making.

Read more

9/6/2024

Cognitively Inspired Energy-Based World Models
Total Score

0

Cognitively Inspired Energy-Based World Models

Alexi Gladstone, Ganesh Nanduru, Md Mofijul Islam, Aman Chadha, Jundong Li, Tariq Iqbal

One of the predominant methods for training world models is autoregressive prediction in the output space of the next element of a sequence. In Natural Language Processing (NLP), this takes the form of Large Language Models (LLMs) predicting the next token; in Computer Vision (CV), this takes the form of autoregressive models predicting the next frame/token/pixel. However, this approach differs from human cognition in several respects. First, human predictions about the future actively influence internal cognitive processes. Second, humans naturally evaluate the plausibility of predictions regarding future states. Based on this capability, and third, by assessing when predictions are sufficient, humans allocate a dynamic amount of time to make a prediction. This adaptive process is analogous to System 2 thinking in psychology. All these capabilities are fundamental to the success of humans at high-level reasoning and planning. Therefore, to address the limitations of traditional autoregressive models lacking these human-like capabilities, we introduce Energy-Based World Models (EBWM). EBWM involves training an Energy-Based Model (EBM) to predict the compatibility of a given context and a predicted future state. In doing so, EBWM enables models to achieve all three facets of human cognition described. Moreover, we developed a variant of the traditional autoregressive transformer tailored for Energy-Based models, termed the Energy-Based Transformer (EBT). Our results demonstrate that EBWM scales better with data and GPU Hours than traditional autoregressive transformers in CV, and that EBWM offers promising early scaling in NLP. Consequently, this approach offers an exciting path toward training future models capable of System 2 thinking and intelligently searching across state spaces.

Read more

6/14/2024