Improving the Utility of Differentially Private Clustering through Dynamical Processing

Read original: arXiv:2304.13886 - Published 8/23/2024 by Junyoung Byun, Yujin Choi, Jaewook Lee
Total Score

0

🔗

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study aims to address the trade-off between utility and privacy in differentially private clustering.
  • Existing methods have poor performance for non-convex clusters, so this paper proposes a more sophisticated approach inspired by Morse theory.
  • The proposed method hierarchically connects Gaussian sub-clusters obtained through existing techniques, without significant additional privacy loss.
  • Experiments show that this framework can improve the clustering performance of existing methods while maintaining the same level of privacy.

Plain English Explanation

Clustering is a technique used to group similar data points together, but when dealing with sensitive information, there's a tradeoff between the accuracy of the clusters and protecting the privacy of the data. Existing methods often struggle with more complex cluster shapes, resulting in lower-quality groupings.

To address this, the researchers in this study developed a new approach inspired by Morse theory, a mathematical concept used to study the shape of surfaces. Their method takes the simple clusters produced by existing techniques and then carefully connects them into more sophisticated, hierarchical groupings. Importantly, they show that this additional processing step doesn't significantly compromise the privacy protections.

Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate that their framework can improve the clustering performance compared to the existing methods, while still maintaining the same level of privacy. This means you can get better insights from your data without sacrificing the confidentiality of the sensitive information.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the use of dynamical processing inspired by Morse theory to hierarchically connect Gaussian sub-clusters obtained through existing differentially private clustering methods.

Differential privacy is a powerful technique for protecting the privacy of data, but it can limit the accuracy of analytics and machine learning models. The researchers recognized that existing differentially private clustering approaches perform poorly on non-convex cluster distributions, which are common in real-world data.

To address this, the researchers developed a two-stage framework. First, they use existing differentially private clustering algorithms to identify Gaussian sub-clusters. Then, they apply a Morse theory-inspired dynamical processing step to hierarchically connect these sub-clusters into more sophisticated groupings.

The key insight is that this additional processing step introduces little to no extra privacy loss, as shown by their theoretical analysis. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, the researchers demonstrate that their framework can significantly improve the clustering performance compared to the baseline methods, while maintaining the same level of differential privacy.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a thorough theoretical and empirical evaluation of their proposed framework, addressing key limitations of existing differentially private clustering methods. However, a few potential caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The dynamical processing step, while mathematically elegant, may introduce additional computational complexity that could limit the scalability of the approach, especially for large-scale datasets. Further research could explore ways to optimize the efficiency of this component.

  • The experiments were conducted on relatively simple synthetic data and a few real-world datasets. It would be valuable to test the framework's performance on a wider range of real-world datasets with more complex cluster structures and noise characteristics.

  • The paper does not discuss the potential impact of the proposed method on the interpretability and explainability of the resulting clusters. Future work could investigate ways to maintain the interpretability of the clusters while optimizing for privacy and utility.

Overall, this paper presents a promising approach to improving the utility of differentially private clustering, but additional research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the method.

Conclusion

This study addresses a critical challenge in the field of differentially private machine learning: the trade-off between the utility and privacy of clustering algorithms. By incorporating Morse theory-inspired dynamical processing, the researchers have developed a framework that can significantly improve the clustering performance of existing differentially private methods without compromising the privacy guarantees.

The implications of this research are far-reaching, as it paves the way for more accurate and privacy-preserving data analysis in a wide range of domains, from healthcare to finance to social sciences. As the need for robust privacy protections continues to grow, innovations like this will be crucial in unlocking the full potential of data-driven decision-making while respecting the privacy of individuals.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

Total Score

0

Improving the Utility of Differentially Private Clustering through Dynamical Processing

Junyoung Byun, Yujin Choi, Jaewook Lee

This study aims to alleviate the trade-off between utility and privacy of differentially private clustering. Existing works focus on simple methods, which show poor performance for non-convex clusters. To fit complex cluster distributions, we propose sophisticated dynamical processing inspired by Morse theory, with which we hierarchically connect the Gaussian sub-clusters obtained through existing methods. Our theoretical results imply that the proposed dynamical processing introduces little to no additional privacy loss. Experiments show that our framework can improve the clustering performance of existing methods at the same privacy level.

Read more

8/23/2024

Making Old Things New: A Unified Algorithm for Differentially Private Clustering
Total Score

0

Making Old Things New: A Unified Algorithm for Differentially Private Clustering

Max Dupr'e la Tour, Monika Henzinger, David Saulpic

As a staple of data analysis and unsupervised learning, the problem of private clustering has been widely studied under various privacy models. Centralized differential privacy is the first of them, and the problem has also been studied for the local and the shuffle variation. In each case, the goal is to design an algorithm that computes privately a clustering, with the smallest possible error. The study of each variation gave rise to new algorithms: the landscape of private clustering algorithms is therefore quite intricate. In this paper, we show that a 20-year-old algorithm can be slightly modified to work for any of these models. This provides a unified picture: while matching almost all previously known results, it allows us to improve some of them and extend it to a new privacy model, the continual observation setting, where the input is changing over time and the algorithm must output a new solution at each time step.

Read more

6/18/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Causal Inference with Differentially Private (Clustered) Outcomes

Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only feasible if participants agree to reveal their potentially sensitive responses. Of the many ways of ensuring privacy, label differential privacy is a widely used measure of an algorithm's privacy guarantee, which might encourage participants to share responses without running the risk of de-anonymization. Many differentially private mechanisms inject noise into the original data-set to achieve this privacy guarantee, which increases the variance of most statistical estimators and makes the precise measurement of causal effects difficult: there exists a fundamental privacy-variance trade-off to performing causal analyses from differentially private data. With the aim of achieving lower variance for stronger privacy guarantees, we suggest a new differential privacy mechanism, Cluster-DP, which leverages any given cluster structure of the data while still allowing for the estimation of causal effects. We show that, depending on an intuitive measure of cluster quality, we can improve the variance loss while maintaining our privacy guarantees. We compare its performance, theoretically and empirically, to that of its unclustered version and a more extreme uniform-prior version which does not use any of the original response distribution, both of which are special cases of the Cluster-DP algorithm.

Read more

5/1/2024

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy
Total Score

0

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy

Dung Nguyen, Ariel Vetzler, Sarit Kraus, Anil Vullikanti

This paper presents a novel approach in Explainable AI (XAI), integrating contrastive explanations with differential privacy in clustering methods. For several basic clustering problems, including $k$-median and $k$-means, we give efficient differential private contrastive explanations that achieve essentially the same explanations as those that non-private clustering explanations can obtain. We define contrastive explanations as the utility difference between the original clustering utility and utility from clustering with a specifically fixed centroid. In each contrastive scenario, we designate a specific data point as the fixed centroid position, enabling us to measure the impact of this constraint on clustering utility under differential privacy. Extensive experiments across various datasets show our method's effectiveness in providing meaningful explanations without significantly compromising data privacy or clustering utility. This underscores our contribution to privacy-aware machine learning, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving a balance between privacy and utility in the explanation of clustering tasks.

Read more

6/10/2024