On Incentivizing Social Information Sharing in Routing Games

2308.13301

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/11/2024 by Songhua Li, Lingjie Duan

🖼️

Abstract

Crowdsourcing services, such as Waze, leverage a mass of mobile users to learn massive point-of-interest (PoI) information while traveling and share it as a public good. Given that crowdsourced users mind their travel costs and possess various preferences over the PoI information along different paths, we formulate the problem as a novel non-atomic multi-path routing game with positive network externalities among users in social information sharing. In the absence of any incentive design, our price of anarchy (PoA) analysis shows that users' selfish routing on the path with the lowest cost will limit information diversity and lead to $PoA = 0$ with an arbitrarily large efficiency loss from the social optimum. This motivates us to design effective incentive mechanisms to remedy while upholding desirable properties such as individual rationality, incentive compatibility, and budget balance for practical users. Without requiring a specific user's path preference, we present a non-monetary mechanism called Adaptive Information Restriction (AIR) that reduces non-cooperative users' access to the public good as an indirect penalty, which meets all the desirable properties. By meticulously adapting penalty fractions to the actual user flows along different paths, our AIR achieves non-trivial $PoA = frac{1}{4}$ with low complexity $O(klog k+log m)$, where $k$ and $m$ denote the numbers of involved paths and user types, respectively. If the system can further enable pricing for users, we then propose a new monetary mechanism called Adaptive Side-Payment (ASP), which adaptively charges and rewards users according to their chosen paths, respectively. Our ASP mechanism successively achieves a $PoA = frac{1}{2}$ with even reduced complexity $O(klog k)$. Finally, our theoretical findings are well corroborated by our experimental results using a real-world public dataset.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the problem of crowdsourcing point-of-interest (PoI) information using the example of services like Waze.
  • It models the problem as a "non-atomic multi-path routing game with positive network externalities," where users have different preferences and costs for sharing information.
  • The authors analyze the "price of anarchy" (PoA) - the loss in efficiency when users act selfishly - and find it can be arbitrarily large.
  • They then propose two incentive mechanisms, "Adaptive Information Restriction" (AIR) and "Adaptive Side-Payment" (ASP), to improve the system's efficiency.

Plain English Explanation

Crowdsourcing services like Waze allow many mobile users to share information about things like traffic conditions and points of interest as they travel. This information is then made available as a public good. However, users may be concerned about their own travel costs and have different preferences for the type of information they want to see.

The researchers model this as a complex game, where each user is trying to minimize their own costs by choosing the best path, but their choices affect the information available to everyone. Without any incentives, the authors show that users will selfishly choose the cheapest path, leading to a severe lack of information diversity and a huge loss in overall efficiency compared to the best possible outcome.

To address this, the researchers design two new mechanisms. The first, called "Adaptive Information Restriction" (AIR), indirectly penalizes users by limiting their access to the shared information if they don't contribute enough. The second, "Adaptive Side-Payment" (ASP), directly charges and rewards users based on their chosen paths. Both of these mechanisms are designed to be fair, practical, and to significantly improve the overall efficiency of the crowdsourcing system.

Technical Explanation

The paper models the crowdsourcing problem as a "non-atomic multi-path routing game with positive network externalities." This means that many users are making independent routing decisions (i.e., non-atomic) across multiple possible paths, and the information they share has positive benefits for other users (network externalities).

Without any incentives, the authors' analysis shows that selfish user behavior leads to a "price of anarchy" (PoA) of 0 - meaning the system's efficiency is arbitrarily far from the social optimum. This motivates the need for effective incentive mechanisms.

The first mechanism proposed is called "Adaptive Information Restriction" (AIR). AIR indirectly penalizes non-cooperative users by reducing their access to the shared information, but without requiring knowledge of each user's specific path preferences. The authors prove that AIR achieves a PoA of 1/4 with low computational complexity.

The second mechanism is "Adaptive Side-Payment" (ASP), which adaptively charges and rewards users based on their chosen paths. ASP achieves a PoA of 1/2 with even lower computational complexity than AIR.

The paper also includes experiments using real-world public data that validate the theoretical findings about the effectiveness of the proposed incentive mechanisms.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a robust theoretical analysis and effective incentive mechanisms to address the challenges of crowdsourcing information in a selfish user environment. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth considering:

  1. The model assumes users have different preferences over PoI information, but does not delve into the specifics of how these preferences are formed or quantified. Further research could explore more realistic models of user preferences.

  2. The incentive mechanisms, while mathematically elegant, may face practical challenges in real-world deployment. Factors like user trust, privacy concerns, and potential gaming of the system could be explored in future work.

  3. The analysis focuses on the overall system efficiency, but does not deeply consider the distribution of benefits and costs among individual users. Further research could investigate the fairness implications of the proposed mechanisms.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and insightful approach to the problem of crowdsourcing information in the presence of selfish user behavior. By modeling the problem as a non-atomic multi-path routing game and designing effective incentive mechanisms, the researchers have made important contributions to the field of mechanism design and crowdsourcing.

The proposed AIR and ASP mechanisms show promise in improving the efficiency of crowdsourcing systems, while upholding desirable properties like individual rationality and budget balance. As crowdsourcing continues to play a vital role in various applications, this work provides a valuable framework for addressing the challenges of aligning user incentives with the greater social good.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🏅

Adaptive Incentive Design with Learning Agents

Chinmay Maheshwari, Kshitij Kulkarni, Manxi Wu, Shankar Sastry

YC

0

Reddit

0

How can the system operator learn an incentive mechanism that achieves social optimality based on limited information about the agents' behavior, who are dynamically updating their strategies? To answer this question, we propose an emph{adaptive} incentive mechanism. This mechanism updates the incentives of agents based on the feedback of each agent's externality, evaluated as the difference between the player's marginal cost and society's marginal cost at each time step. The proposed mechanism updates the incentives on a slower timescale compared to the agents' learning dynamics, resulting in a two-timescale coupled dynamical system. Notably, this mechanism is agnostic to the specific learning dynamics used by agents to update their strategies. We show that any fixed point of this adaptive incentive mechanism corresponds to the optimal incentive mechanism, ensuring that the Nash equilibrium coincides with the socially optimal strategy. Additionally, we provide sufficient conditions that guarantee the convergence of the adaptive incentive mechanism to a fixed point. Our results apply to both atomic and non-atomic games. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed mechanism, we verify the convergence conditions in two practically relevant games: atomic networked quadratic aggregative games and non-atomic network routing games.

Read more

5/28/2024

Socially Optimal Energy Usage via Adaptive Pricing

Socially Optimal Energy Usage via Adaptive Pricing

Jiayi Li, Matthew Motoki, Baosen Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

A central challenge in using price signals to coordinate the electricity consumption of a group of users is the operator's lack of knowledge of the users due to privacy concerns. In this paper, we develop a two-time-scale incentive mechanism that alternately updates between the users and a system operator. As long as the users can optimize their own consumption subject to a given price, the operator does not need to know or attempt to learn any private information of the users for price design. Users adjust their consumption following the price and the system redesigns the price based on the users' consumption. We show that under mild assumptions, this iterative process converges to the social welfare solution. In particular, the cost of the users need not always be convex and its consumption can be the output of a machine learning-based load control algorithm.

Read more

4/1/2024

🔄

Entanglement: Balancing Punishment and Compensation, Repeated Dilemma Game-Theoretic Analysis of Maximum Compensation Problem for Bypass and Least Cost Paths in Fact-Checking, Case of Fake News with Weak Wallace's Law

Yasuko Kawahata

YC

0

Reddit

0

This research note is organized with respect to a novel approach to solving problems related to the spread of fake news and effective fact-checking. Focusing on the least-cost routing problem, the discussion is organized with respect to the use of Metzler functions and Metzler matrices to model the dynamics of information propagation among news providers. With this approach, we designed a strategy to minimize the spread of fake news, which is detrimental to informational health, while at the same time maximizing the spread of credible information. In particular, through the punitive dominance problem and the maximum compensation problem, we developed and examined a path to reassess the incentives of news providers to act and to analyze their impact on the equilibrium of the information market. By applying the concept of entanglement to the context of information propagation, we shed light on the complexity of interactions among news providers and contribute to the formulation of more effective information management strategies. This study provides new theoretical and practical insights into issues related to fake news and fact-checking, and will be examined against improving informational health and public digital health.This paper is partially an attempt to utilize Generative AI and was written with educational intent. There are currently no plans for it to become a peer-reviewed paper.

Read more

4/30/2024

Algorithmic collusion in a two-sided market: A rideshare example

Algorithmic collusion in a two-sided market: A rideshare example

Pravesh Koirala, Forrest Laine

YC

0

Reddit

0

With dynamic pricing on the rise, firms are using sophisticated algorithms for price determination. These algorithms are often non-interpretable and there has been a recent interest in their seemingly emergent ability to tacitly collude with each other without any prior communication whatsoever. Most of the previous works investigate algorithmic collusion on simple reinforcement learning (RL) based algorithms operating on a basic market model. Instead, we explore the collusive tendencies of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a state-of-the-art continuous state/action space RL algorithm, on a complex double-sided hierarchical market model of rideshare. For this purpose, we extend a mathematical program network (MPN) based rideshare model to a temporal multi origin-destination setting and use PPO to solve for a repeated duopoly game. Our results indicate that PPO can either converge to a competitive or a collusive equilibrium depending upon the underlying market characteristics, even when the hyper-parameters are held constant.

Read more

5/7/2024