Inference of Causal Networks using a Topological Threshold

Read original: arXiv:2404.14460 - Published 4/24/2024 by Filipe Barroso, Diogo Gomes, Gareth J. Baxter
Total Score

0

Inference of Causal Networks using a Topological Threshold

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a method for inferring causal networks using a topological threshold.
  • The method aims to identify causal relationships between variables by analyzing the influence topology of a network.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both simulated and real-world datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a way to uncover causal relationships between different factors or variables in a complex system. The researchers developed a method that looks at the "influence topology" of a network - how the various elements are connected and influence each other.

By analyzing this influence topology using a specific mathematical threshold, the method can identify the causal links between the different variables. This is helpful for understanding the underlying drivers and mechanisms in a complex system, such as a neural network or a social network.

The authors tested their approach on both simulated data and real-world datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness at uncovering the true causal relationships between the variables. This type of causal inference can provide important insights, for example in interpreting deep learning models or predicting links in a network.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a method for inferring causal networks based on a topological threshold. The key idea is to analyze the "net influence" between variables, which captures the directional flow of influence in the network.

The net influence between variables is computed using a matrix of pairwise influences, which are estimated from data using a regression-based approach. The authors then apply a threshold to this matrix to identify the dominant causal links in the network.

The thresholding step is crucial, as it allows the method to distinguish between spurious and genuine causal relationships. The authors explore different ways of setting the threshold, including using statistical significance tests and information-theoretic measures.

The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on both synthetic benchmarks and real-world datasets, including gene regulatory networks and social influence networks. The results demonstrate that the method can accurately recover the underlying causal structure, outperforming alternative approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for inferring causal networks from data, with a strong theoretical foundation and empirical validation. However, there are a few caveats and potential areas for further research:

  1. The method relies on the assumption of linear relationships between variables, which may not always hold in real-world complex systems. Extensions to handle nonlinear relationships would be a valuable enhancement.

  2. The authors acknowledge that the performance of the method can be sensitive to the choice of the topological threshold. Developing more robust and automated threshold selection strategies would improve the method's usability.

  3. The evaluation is limited to relatively small-scale networks. Assessing the scalability of the approach to larger, high-dimensional systems would be an important next step.

  4. While the paper demonstrates the method's effectiveness, it does not provide much insight into the practical interpretability of the inferred causal networks. Exploring ways to enhance the interpretability of the results could further improve the method's utility.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of causal inference, proposing a novel approach that leverages the topology of influence networks. The results are promising, and the method has the potential to provide important insights in a variety of domains, from biological systems to social networks.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method for inferring causal networks using a topological threshold. The key innovation is the use of "net influence" to capture the directional flow of influence between variables, which is then thresholded to identify the dominant causal links.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both simulated and real-world datasets, showing that it can accurately recover the underlying causal structure. While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference and has the potential to provide valuable insights across a range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Inference of Causal Networks using a Topological Threshold
Total Score

0

Inference of Causal Networks using a Topological Threshold

Filipe Barroso, Diogo Gomes, Gareth J. Baxter

We propose a constraint-based algorithm, which automatically determines causal relevance thresholds, to infer causal networks from data. We call these topological thresholds. We present two methods for determining the threshold: the first seeks a set of edges that leaves no disconnected nodes in the network; the second seeks a causal large connected component in the data. We tested these methods both for discrete synthetic and real data, and compared the results with those obtained for the PC algorithm, which we took as the benchmark. We show that this novel algorithm is generally faster and more accurate than the PC algorithm. The algorithm for determining the thresholds requires choosing a measure of causality. We tested our methods for Fisher Correlations, commonly used in PC algorithm (for instance in cite{kalisch2005}), and further proposed a discrete and asymmetric measure of causality, that we called Net Influence, which provided very good results when inferring causal networks from discrete data. This metric allows for inferring directionality of the edges in the process of applying the thresholds, speeding up the inference of causal DAGs.

Read more

4/24/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects

Seyedeh Baharan Khatami, Harsh Parikh, Haowei Chen, Sudeepa Roy, Babak Salimi

We address the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data. This results in challenges due to interference -- where a unit's outcome is affected by neighbors' treatments -- and network-induced confounding factors. While there is extensive literature focusing on estimating causal effects in social network setups, a majority of them make prior assumptions about the form of network-induced confounding mechanisms. Such strong assumptions are rarely likely to hold especially in high-dimensional networks. We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network. We demonstrate the semiparametric efficiency of our proposed estimator under mild regularity conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study. We use our method to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.

Read more

6/4/2024

Topological Generalization Bounds for Discrete-Time Stochastic Optimization Algorithms
Total Score

0

Topological Generalization Bounds for Discrete-Time Stochastic Optimization Algorithms

Rayna Andreeva, Benjamin Dupuis, Rik Sarkar, Tolga Birdal, Umut c{S}imc{s}ekli

We present a novel set of rigorous and computationally efficient topology-based complexity notions that exhibit a strong correlation with the generalization gap in modern deep neural networks (DNNs). DNNs show remarkable generalization properties, yet the source of these capabilities remains elusive, defying the established statistical learning theory. Recent studies have revealed that properties of training trajectories can be indicative of generalization. Building on this insight, state-of-the-art methods have leveraged the topology of these trajectories, particularly their fractal dimension, to quantify generalization. Most existing works compute this quantity by assuming continuous- or infinite-time training dynamics, complicating the development of practical estimators capable of accurately predicting generalization without access to test data. In this paper, we respect the discrete-time nature of training trajectories and investigate the underlying topological quantities that can be amenable to topological data analysis tools. This leads to a new family of reliable topological complexity measures that provably bound the generalization error, eliminating the need for restrictive geometric assumptions. These measures are computationally friendly, enabling us to propose simple yet effective algorithms for computing generalization indices. Moreover, our flexible framework can be extended to different domains, tasks, and architectures. Our experimental results demonstrate that our new complexity measures correlate highly with generalization error in industry-standards architectures such as transformers and deep graph networks. Our approach consistently outperforms existing topological bounds across a wide range of datasets, models, and optimizers, highlighting the practical relevance and effectiveness of our complexity measures.

Read more

7/12/2024

📈

Total Score

0

A model for efficient dynamical ranking in networks

Andrea Della Vecchia, Kibidi Neocosmos, Daniel B. Larremore, Cristopher Moore, Caterina De Bacco

We present a physics-inspired method for inferring dynamic rankings in directed temporal networks - networks in which each directed and timestamped edge reflects the outcome and timing of a pairwise interaction. The inferred ranking of each node is real-valued and varies in time as each new edge, encoding an outcome like a win or loss, raises or lowers the node's estimated strength or prestige, as is often observed in real scenarios including sequences of games, tournaments, or interactions in animal hierarchies. Our method works by solving a linear system of equations and requires only one parameter to be tuned. As a result, the corresponding algorithm is scalable and efficient. We test our method by evaluating its ability to predict interactions (edges' existence) and their outcomes (edges' directions) in a variety of applications, including both synthetic and real data. Our analysis shows that in many cases our method's performance is better than existing methods for predicting dynamic rankings and interaction outcomes.

Read more

8/12/2024