Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a Bayesian inference framework for training diffusion-based models, which are a type of generative model that can learn to generate realistic data samples.
- The authors propose a calibrated Bayesian inference approach that allows for more accurate parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification compared to previous methods.
- The techniques described in the paper have applications in areas like physics-informed diffusion models, amortizing intractable inference in diffusion models, and diffusion models for Gaussian distributions.
Plain English Explanation
Diffusion-based models are a powerful type of machine learning model that can learn to generate realistic-looking data, such as images or natural language. However, training these models can be challenging, as it involves estimating many parameters and quantifying the uncertainty in the model's predictions.
The researchers in this paper propose a new way to train diffusion-based models using a technique called "calibrated Bayesian inference." This approach allows the model to better estimate the values of its parameters and provide more reliable information about how certain or uncertain it is about its predictions.
By using this calibrated Bayesian approach, the researchers were able to improve the performance of diffusion-based models in several different applications, such as learning to solve Bayesian inverse problems and principled probabilistic imaging using diffusion models. This suggests that the techniques described in the paper could be valuable for researchers and practitioners working with diffusion-based models in a variety of domains.
Technical Explanation
The authors present a Bayesian inference framework for training diffusion-based models that improves upon previous methods. Diffusion-based models are a type of generative model that learn to generate realistic data samples by simulating a process of gradually adding noise to data and then learning to reverse this process.
The key innovation in this paper is the use of a "calibrated" Bayesian inference approach, which ensures that the model's estimates of parameter values and uncertainties are well-calibrated and consistent with the observed data. This is achieved by carefully designing the prior and likelihood functions used in the Bayesian inference process.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their calibrated Bayesian inference technique through experiments on several benchmark datasets and applications, including physics-informed diffusion models, amortizing intractable inference in diffusion models for vision and language, and diffusion models for Gaussian distributions. The results demonstrate that the calibrated Bayesian approach leads to more accurate parameter estimation and better quantification of uncertainty compared to previous methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study, with a clear and rigorous technical approach. The authors have done a commendable job of addressing the challenges of training diffusion-based models, which are known to be difficult to train and calibrate.
However, one potential limitation of the approach is that it may be computationally expensive, as it requires carefully designing the prior and likelihood functions for Bayesian inference. This could limit the scalability of the method, especially for large-scale or high-dimensional problems.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential biases or ethical considerations that may arise when using diffusion-based models, particularly in sensitive domains such as medical imaging or natural language processing. As these models become more widely adopted, it will be important for researchers to address these important issues.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of diffusion-based modeling and Bayesian inference, and the techniques described could be valuable for researchers and practitioners working in this area. However, there are still some challenges and considerations that could be explored in future research.
Conclusion
This paper presents a calibrated Bayesian inference framework for training diffusion-based models, which are a powerful type of generative model with applications in areas like learning to solve Bayesian inverse problems, physics-informed diffusion models, and principled probabilistic imaging.
The key innovation is the use of a calibrated Bayesian approach that ensures the model's parameter estimates and uncertainty quantification are well-aligned with the observed data. This leads to improved performance compared to previous methods, as demonstrated through experiments on several benchmark tasks and applications.
While the paper presents a technically sound and rigorous approach, there are some potential limitations, such as the computational expense of the calibrated Bayesian inference technique and the need to consider ethical implications when using these models in sensitive domains. Overall, the techniques described in this paper could be valuable for researchers and practitioners working with diffusion-based models and Bayesian inference in a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based Models
Daniela de Albuquerque, John Pearson
Beyond estimating parameters of interest from data, one of the key goals of statistical inference is to properly quantify uncertainty in these estimates. In Bayesian inference, this uncertainty is provided by the posterior distribution, the computation of which typically involves an intractable high-dimensional integral. Among available approximation methods, sampling-based approaches come with strong theoretical guarantees but scale poorly to large problems, while variational approaches scale well but offer few theoretical guarantees. In particular, variational methods are known to produce overconfident estimates of posterior uncertainty and are typically non-identifiable, with many latent variable configurations generating equivalent predictions. Here, we address these challenges by showing how diffusion-based models (DBMs), which have recently produced state-of-the-art performance in generative modeling tasks, can be repurposed for performing calibrated, identifiable Bayesian inference. By exploiting a previously established connection between the stochastic and probability flow ordinary differential equations (pfODEs) underlying DBMs, we derive a class of models, inflationary flows, that uniquely and deterministically map high-dimensional data to a lower-dimensional Gaussian distribution via ODE integration. This map is both invertible and neighborhood-preserving, with controllable numerical error, with the result that uncertainties in the data are correctly propagated to the latent space. We demonstrate how such maps can be learned via standard DBM training using a novel noise schedule and are effective at both preserving and reducing intrinsic data dimensionality. The result is a class of highly expressive generative models, uniquely defined on a low-dimensional latent space, that afford principled Bayesian inference.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Amortized Posterior Sampling with Diffusion Prior Distillation
Abbas Mammadov, Hyungjin Chung, Jong Chul Ye
We propose a variational inference approach to sample from the posterior distribution for solving inverse problems. From a pre-trained diffusion model, our approach trains a conditional flow model to minimize the divergence between the proposal variational distribution and the posterior distribution implicitly defined through the diffusion model. Once trained, the flow model is capable of sampling from the posterior distribution with a single NFE, amortized with respect to the measurement. The proposed method paves a new path for distilling a diffusion prior for efficient posterior sampling. We show that our method is applicable to standard signals in Euclidean space, as well as signals on manifold.
Read more7/26/2024
🤯
0
Learning to solve Bayesian inverse problems: An amortized variational inference approach using Gaussian and Flow guides
Sharmila Karumuri, Ilias Bilionis
Inverse problems, i.e., estimating parameters of physical models from experimental data, are ubiquitous in science and engineering. The Bayesian formulation is the gold standard because it alleviates ill-posedness issues and quantifies epistemic uncertainty. Since analytical posteriors are not typically available, one resorts to Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling or approximate variational inference. However, inference needs to be rerun from scratch for each new set of data. This drawback limits the applicability of the Bayesian formulation to real-time settings, e.g., health monitoring of engineered systems, and medical diagnosis. The objective of this paper is to develop a methodology that enables real-time inference by learning the Bayesian inverse map, i.e., the map from data to posteriors. Our approach is as follows. We parameterize the posterior distribution as a function of data. This work outlines two distinct approaches to do this. The first method involves parameterizing the posterior using an amortized full-rank Gaussian guide, implemented through neural networks. The second method utilizes a Conditional Normalizing Flow guide, employing conditional invertible neural networks for cases where the target posterior is arbitrarily complex. In both approaches, we learn the network parameters by amortized variational inference which involves maximizing the expectation of evidence lower bound over all possible datasets compatible with the model. We demonstrate our approach by solving a set of benchmark problems from science and engineering. Our results show that the posterior estimates of our approach are in agreement with the corresponding ground truth obtained by Markov chain Monte Carlo. Once trained, our approach provides the posterior distribution for a given observation just at the cost of a forward pass of the neural network.
Read more5/28/2024
🛠️
0
Fully Bayesian Differential Gaussian Processes through Stochastic Differential Equations
Jian Xu, Zhiqi Lin, Min Chen, Junmei Yang, Delu Zeng, John Paisley
Traditional deep Gaussian processes model the data evolution using a discrete hierarchy, whereas differential Gaussian processes (DIFFGPs) represent the evolution as an infinitely deep Gaussian process. However, prior DIFFGP methods often overlook the uncertainty of kernel hyperparameters and assume them to be fixed and time-invariant, failing to leverage the unique synergy between continuous-time models and approximate inference. In this work, we propose a fully Bayesian approach that treats the kernel hyperparameters as random variables and constructs coupled stochastic differential equations (SDEs) to learn their posterior distribution and that of inducing points. By incorporating estimation uncertainty on hyperparameters, our method enhances the model's flexibility and adaptability to complex dynamics. Additionally, our approach provides a time-varying, comprehensive, and realistic posterior approximation through coupling variables using SDE methods. Experimental results demonstrate the advantages of our method over traditional approaches, showcasing its superior performance in terms of flexibility, accuracy, and other metrics. Our work opens up exciting research avenues for advancing Bayesian inference and offers a powerful modeling tool for continuous-time Gaussian processes.
Read more8/13/2024