Information-Theoretic Foundations for Neural Scaling Laws
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the information-theoretic foundations underlying neural scaling laws, which describe the relationship between model size and performance across a range of deep learning tasks.
- The authors propose a framework for understanding how the complexity of the task and the amount of training data affect the optimal model size and performance.
- The paper provides theoretical justification for empirical observations about neural scaling laws and offers insights into the fundamental principles governing deep learning.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning models have become incredibly powerful, with larger and more complex models often achieving better performance on a wide variety of tasks. However, the reasons behind this relationship between model size and performance have not been fully understood.
The authors of this paper have developed a framework for thinking about this phenomenon from an information-theoretic perspective. They start by considering the complexity of the task that the model is trying to learn, and the amount of training data available. These two factors, they argue, determine the optimal size and complexity of the model that can be trained effectively.
For example, if the task is very complex and the training data is limited, a smaller model may be optimal, as it can generalize better from the limited data. Conversely, if the task is relatively simple and there is a large amount of training data available, a larger model may be able to capture more of the underlying patterns and achieve better performance.
By framing the problem in this way, the authors are able to provide a theoretical justification for the empirical observations about neural scaling laws that have been made in the field of deep learning. This allows for a deeper understanding of the fundamental principles that govern the relationship between model size, task complexity, and training data.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for learning that is grounded in information theory. The authors start by defining the "task complexity" as the amount of information required to describe the true mapping from inputs to outputs, and the "model complexity" as the amount of information required to describe the model parameters.
They then show that the optimal model complexity is determined by the task complexity and the amount of training data available. Specifically, they derive a bound on the model complexity that depends on the task complexity and the number of training examples. This bound suggests that for a fixed task complexity, larger models will perform better when more training data is available, but that there are diminishing returns as the model size continues to increase.
The authors also explore the implications of this framework for understanding neural scaling laws, which describe the empirical relationship between model size and performance across a range of deep learning tasks. They demonstrate that their information-theoretic perspective can provide a principled justification for these observed scaling laws.
Additionally, the paper discusses connections to other theoretical frameworks, such as the "large-N field theory" approach to understanding neural scaling laws, and highlights how the information-theoretic perspective can complement and unify these different perspectives.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a compelling and rigorous information-theoretic framework for understanding neural scaling laws. The key strength of this approach is that it provides a principled, theoretical foundation for the empirical observations that have been made in the field of deep learning.
One potential limitation of the paper is that the analysis is largely focused on the scaling behavior of models, without delving deeply into the specific mechanisms or architectural choices that might influence this behavior. While the information-theoretic perspective offers valuable insights, it would be interesting to see how it might be combined with other theoretical frameworks, such as those focused on the inductive biases of different model architectures.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential practical challenges or considerations that might arise when applying these principles in real-world deep learning systems. For example, the authors' analysis assumes the availability of infinite computational resources, which may not be the case in many practical applications.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the theoretical understanding of deep learning, and the information-theoretic framework presented here could serve as a valuable tool for guiding the design and development of future deep learning models.
Conclusion
This paper provides a rigorous, information-theoretic foundation for understanding the relationship between model size and performance in deep learning. By framing the problem in terms of task complexity and the availability of training data, the authors are able to derive theoretical justifications for the empirical scaling laws that have been observed in the field.
The insights presented in this paper have the potential to not only deepen our understanding of deep learning, but also to inform the design of future deep learning models. By considering the fundamental information-theoretic principles that govern the scaling behavior of these models, researchers and practitioners may be able to develop more efficient and effective deep learning systems that can tackle increasingly complex tasks.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to develop a more comprehensive and principled theoretical framework for deep learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Information-Theoretic Foundations for Neural Scaling Laws
Hong Jun Jeon, Benjamin Van Roy
Neural scaling laws aim to characterize how out-of-sample error behaves as a function of model and training dataset size. Such scaling laws guide allocation of a computational resources between model and data processing to minimize error. However, existing theoretical support for neural scaling laws lacks rigor and clarity, entangling the roles of information and optimization. In this work, we develop rigorous information-theoretic foundations for neural scaling laws. This allows us to characterize scaling laws for data generated by a two-layer neural network of infinite width. We observe that the optimal relation between data and model size is linear, up to logarithmic factors, corroborating large-scale empirical investigations. Concise yet general results of the kind we establish may bring clarity to this topic and inform future investigations.
Read more7/2/2024
0
A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan
On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Neural Scaling Laws on Graphs
Jingzhe Liu, Haitao Mao, Zhikai Chen, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Jiliang Tang
Deep graph models (e.g., graph neural networks and graph transformers) have become important techniques for leveraging knowledge across various types of graphs. Yet, the scaling properties of deep graph models have not been systematically investigated, casting doubt on the feasibility of achieving large graph models through enlarging the model and dataset sizes. In this work, we delve into neural scaling laws on graphs from both model and data perspectives. We first verify the validity of such laws on graphs, establishing formulations to describe the scaling behaviors. For model scaling, we investigate the phenomenon of scaling law collapse and identify overfitting as the potential reason. Moreover, we reveal that the model depth of deep graph models can impact the model scaling behaviors, which differ from observations in other domains such as CV and NLP. For data scaling, we suggest that the number of graphs can not effectively metric the graph data volume in scaling law since the sizes of different graphs are highly irregular. Instead, we reform the data scaling law with the number of edges as the metric to address the irregular graph sizes. We further demonstrate the reformed law offers a unified view of the data scaling behaviors for various fundamental graph tasks including node classification, link prediction, and graph classification. This work provides valuable insights into neural scaling laws on graphs, which can serve as an essential step toward large graph models.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Unified Neural Network Scaling Laws and Scale-time Equivalence
Akhilan Boopathy, Ila Fiete
As neural networks continue to grow in size but datasets might not, it is vital to understand how much performance improvement can be expected: is it more important to scale network size or data volume? Thus, neural network scaling laws, which characterize how test error varies with network size and data volume, have become increasingly important. However, existing scaling laws are often applicable only in limited regimes and often do not incorporate or predict well-known phenomena such as double descent. Here, we present a novel theoretical characterization of how three factors -- model size, training time, and data volume -- interact to determine the performance of deep neural networks. We first establish a theoretical and empirical equivalence between scaling the size of a neural network and increasing its training time proportionally. Scale-time equivalence challenges the current practice, wherein large models are trained for small durations, and suggests that smaller models trained over extended periods could match their efficacy. It also leads to a novel method for predicting the performance of large-scale networks from small-scale networks trained for extended epochs, and vice versa. We next combine scale-time equivalence with a linear model analysis of double descent to obtain a unified theoretical scaling law, which we confirm with experiments across vision benchmarks and network architectures. These laws explain several previously unexplained phenomena: reduced data requirements for generalization in larger models, heightened sensitivity to label noise in overparameterized models, and instances where increasing model scale does not necessarily enhance performance. Our findings hold significant implications for the practical deployment of neural networks, offering a more accessible and efficient path to training and fine-tuning large models.
Read more9/10/2024