Efficiently Computable Safety Bounds for Gaussian Processes in Active Learning

Read original: arXiv:2402.18260 - Published 4/16/2024 by Jorn Tebbe, Christoph Zimmer, Ansgar Steland, Markus Lange-Hegermann, Fabian Mies
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers address the challenge of exploring the design space of physical systems while respecting safety constraints, a common issue in many technical applications.
  • Gaussian Processes (GPs) and their uncertainty estimations are widely used for this purpose, but evaluating strict safety requirements can be computationally expensive.
  • The paper proposes a method that provides provable safety bounds using the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior GP, significantly reducing the number of samples required for estimating high safety probabilities.
  • The effectiveness of this safe active learning approach is demonstrated through simulations and a real-world engine example.

Plain English Explanation

When designing and testing physical systems, it's important to consider safety constraints to prevent harm or damage. However, these constraints can limit the amount of exploration that can be done to understand the full design space. Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a common tool used to model these systems and estimate the uncertainty in their behavior, but evaluating strict safety requirements with GPs can be computationally expensive, often requiring a large number of simulations.

The researchers in this paper developed a new method that can provide provable safety bounds using fewer simulations. Their approach adaptively samples the median of the maximum (or "supremum") of the posterior GP distribution, which allows them to estimate high safety probabilities more efficiently. This means they can explore the design space more thoroughly without compromising on safety.

The team demonstrates the effectiveness of their "safe active learning" approach through extensive computer simulations as well as a real-world example involving an engine design. By reducing the number of simulations needed to ensure safety, their method enables faster evaluation and exploration of the design space.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of actively learning physical systems while respecting practical safety constraints, which can restrict the exploration of the design space. Gaussian Processes (GPs) and their calibrated uncertainty estimations are widely used for this purpose, as seen in related work on Gaussian Process regression with soft inequality constraints, adaptive gradient-enhanced GP surrogates, and active learning-based model predictive control.

However, in many technical applications, the design space is explored via continuous trajectories, along which the safety needs to be assessed. This is particularly challenging for strict safety requirements in GP methods, as it employs computationally expensive Monte-Carlo sampling of high quantiles.

The researchers address these challenges by providing provable safety bounds based on the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior GP. Their method, called "Global Safe Sequential Learning", significantly reduces the number of samples required for estimating high safety probabilities, resulting in faster evaluation without sacrificing accuracy and exploration speed.

The effectiveness of this safe active learning approach is demonstrated through extensive simulations and validated using a real-world engine example.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a robust and efficient method for safe active learning of physical systems, which is an important challenge in many technical applications. The use of the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior GP to provide provable safety bounds is a novel and promising approach.

One potential limitation mentioned in the paper is that the method assumes the system can be accurately modeled using a GP. While GPs are a powerful and flexible tool, there may be cases where the system dynamics do not fit this assumption well, and alternative modeling approaches may be required.

Additionally, the real-world engine example used to validate the method is a relatively simple system. It would be interesting to see how the approach scales and performs on more complex, high-dimensional physical systems with more challenging safety constraints.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential impact of model inaccuracies or uncertainties on the safety guarantees provided by the method. In practical applications, there may be sources of uncertainty beyond the GP modeling that could affect the reliability of the safety bounds.

Overall, the research presents a valuable contribution to the field of safe active learning, and the proposed method appears to be a significant improvement over existing approaches. However, further research and validation on more complex systems would be beneficial to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of the approach.

Conclusion

This research addresses the important challenge of actively learning physical systems while respecting strict safety constraints, a common issue in many technical applications. By providing provable safety bounds based on the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior Gaussian Process, the researchers have developed a method that can significantly reduce the computational cost of ensuring safety, enabling faster evaluation and more thorough exploration of the design space.

The effectiveness of this "Global Safe Sequential Learning" approach has been demonstrated through extensive simulations and a real-world engine example, highlighting its potential to advance the field of safe active learning. While the method has some limitations, such as the assumption of accurate GP modeling, the research presents a valuable contribution that could have important implications for the design and development of a wide range of physical systems, from industrial machinery to autonomous vehicles.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Efficiently Computable Safety Bounds for Gaussian Processes in Active Learning

Jorn Tebbe, Christoph Zimmer, Ansgar Steland, Markus Lange-Hegermann, Fabian Mies

Active learning of physical systems must commonly respect practical safety constraints, which restricts the exploration of the design space. Gaussian Processes (GPs) and their calibrated uncertainty estimations are widely used for this purpose. In many technical applications the design space is explored via continuous trajectories, along which the safety needs to be assessed. This is particularly challenging for strict safety requirements in GP methods, as it employs computationally expensive Monte-Carlo sampling of high quantiles. We address these challenges by providing provable safety bounds based on the adaptively sampled median of the supremum of the posterior GP. Our method significantly reduces the number of samples required for estimating high safety probabilities, resulting in faster evaluation without sacrificing accuracy and exploration speed. The effectiveness of our safe active learning approach is demonstrated through extensive simulations and validated using a real-world engine example.

Read more

4/16/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Towards safe and tractable Gaussian process-based MPC: Efficient sampling within a sequential quadratic programming framework

Manish Prajapat, Amon Lahr, Johannes Kohler, Andreas Krause, Melanie N. Zeilinger

Learning uncertain dynamics models using Gaussian process~(GP) regression has been demonstrated to enable high-performance and safety-aware control strategies for challenging real-world applications. Yet, for computational tractability, most approaches for Gaussian process-based model predictive control (GP-MPC) are based on approximations of the reachable set that are either overly conservative or impede the controller's safety guarantees. To address these challenges, we propose a robust GP-MPC formulation that guarantees constraint satisfaction with high probability. For its tractable implementation, we propose a sampling-based GP-MPC approach that iteratively generates consistent dynamics samples from the GP within a sequential quadratic programming framework. We highlight the improved reachable set approximation compared to existing methods, as well as real-time feasible computation times, using two numerical examples.

Read more

9/17/2024

Global Safe Sequential Learning via Efficient Knowledge Transfer
Total Score

0

Global Safe Sequential Learning via Efficient Knowledge Transfer

Cen-You Li, Olaf Duennbier, Marc Toussaint, Barbara Rakitsch, Christoph Zimmer

Sequential learning methods such as active learning and Bayesian optimization select the most informative data to learn about a task. In many medical or engineering applications, the data selection is constrained by a priori unknown safety conditions. A promissing line of safe learning methods utilize Gaussian processes (GPs) to model the safety probability and perform data selection in areas with high safety confidence. However, accurate safety modeling requires prior knowledge or consumes data. In addition, the safety confidence centers around the given observations which leads to local exploration. As transferable source knowledge is often available in safety critical experiments, we propose to consider transfer safe sequential learning to accelerate the learning of safety. We further consider a pre-computation of source components to reduce the additional computational load that is introduced by incorporating source data. In this paper, we theoretically analyze the maximum explorable safe regions of conventional safe learning methods. Furthermore, we empirically demonstrate that our approach 1) learns a task with lower data consumption, 2) globally explores multiple disjoint safe regions under guidance of the source knowledge, and 3) operates with computation comparable to conventional safe learning methods.

Read more

4/16/2024

Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization
Total Score

0

Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization

Alessandro G. Bottero, Carlos E. Luis, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters

We consider a sequential decision making task, where the goal is to optimize an unknown function without evaluating parameters that violate an a~priori unknown (safety) constraint. A common approach is to place a Gaussian process prior on the unknown functions and allow evaluations only in regions that are safe with high probability. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. Moreover, the way in which they exploit regularity assumptions about the constraint introduces an additional critical hyperparameter. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate. The combination of this exploration criterion with a well known Bayesian optimization acquisition function yields a novel safe Bayesian optimization selection criterion. Our approach is naturally applicable to continuous domains and does not require additional explicit hyperparameters. We theoretically analyze the method and show that we do not violate the safety constraint with high probability and that we learn about the value of the safe optimum up to arbitrary precision. Empirical evaluations demonstrate improved data-efficiency and scalability.

Read more

5/13/2024