A Continuous Relaxation for Discrete Bayesian Optimization

Overview

• Efficiently optimizing over discrete data with limited target observations is a challenge in Bayesian optimization.
• The authors propose a continuous relaxation of the objective function to make inference and optimization computationally tractable.
• The method is motivated by the need to optimize protein sequences for expensive-to-evaluate biochemical properties, where very few observations and strict budgets exist.
• The key advantages are treating the problem in a continuous setting and incorporating available prior knowledge over sequences.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian optimization is a powerful technique for finding the best settings of a system by intelligently exploring the space of possible settings. However, it can be challenging to use Bayesian optimization when the system being optimized has a discrete set of possible settings, and there are only a few observations available of how well the system performs.

To address this, the authors of the paper propose a new approach that converts the discrete optimization problem into a continuous one. This allows them to use established optimization techniques that work well in continuous spaces. Importantly, their method also lets them incorporate any prior knowledge they have about the problem domain, such as what kinds of settings tend to perform well.

The authors illustrate their approach by considering the problem of optimizing the sequence of proteins to have desirable biochemical properties. Evaluating the performance of a protein sequence can be very expensive, so the authors need to make the most of the limited data they have. Their continuous relaxation of the problem, combined with the use of prior knowledge, allows them to navigate this challenge effectively.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of the paper is a novel acquisition function for Bayesian optimization that operates in a continuous space, even when the underlying optimization problem is discrete. The authors start by relaxing the discrete objective function into a continuous one, using a weighting of the Hellinger distance between distributions over the discrete domain.

This weighting incorporates available prior knowledge about the problem, which the authors obtain from distributions learned over the sequence space. By formulating the acquisition function in this way, they are able to optimize it using standard continuous or discrete optimization algorithms.

The authors evaluate their approach on two biochemical sequence optimization tasks, demonstrating its ability to outperform standard Bayesian optimization techniques in settings with very limited data and strict evaluation budgets.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that their approach relies on the availability of prior knowledge about the problem domain, in the form of learned distributions over the sequence space. In domains where such prior knowledge is not readily available, the benefits of their method may be limited.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the properties of the proposed acquisition function, such as its convergence guarantees or regret bounds. Further research could shed light on the theoretical underpinnings of this approach and its performance in the limit of large data.

Nevertheless, the authors have presented a novel and promising technique for addressing the challenge of Bayesian optimization over discrete domains with limited data, which could have significant practical implications in applications such as protein engineering.

Conclusion

The authors have developed a Bayesian optimization approach that can effectively handle discrete optimization problems with limited data by relaxing the objective function to a continuous space and incorporating available prior knowledge. This method shows promise for applications where evaluating the performance of discrete settings, such as protein sequences, is costly, making efficient exploration of the search space critical.

While the approach relies on the availability of prior knowledge, and further theoretical analysis would be valuable, the authors have demonstrated the practical utility of their technique on relevant optimization tasks. Overall, this research represents an important step forward in expanding the capabilities of Bayesian optimization to tackle challenging real-world problems.