InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces InsightBench, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of business analytics agents in generating multi-step insights from enterprise data.
- It highlights the importance of developing AI systems that can provide actionable insights to support business decision-making.
- The benchmark aims to assess an agent's ability to uncover meaningful patterns, generate hypotheses, and communicate insights effectively.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents InsightBench, a new benchmark for testing how well AI-powered business analytics agents can generate useful insights from complex enterprise data. The researchers argue that as AI becomes more integrated into business decision-making, it's crucial to have a way to evaluate how well these "agents" can take raw data, identify important trends and patterns, and then communicate those insights in a clear and actionable way.
The InsightBench benchmark simulates a real-world business scenario where an analytics agent is given a dataset and asked to uncover insights that could help the company make better decisions. The agent has to go through a multi-step process - first understanding the data, then formulating hypotheses about what might be driving certain trends, and finally presenting the key insights in a way that a business leader could easily grasp and act upon.
By testing agents on this kind of realistic, multi-faceted task, the researchers hope to get a more comprehensive picture of the agent's capabilities compared to simpler benchmarks that only assess narrow skills. The ultimate goal is to push the development of AI systems that can truly partner with human analysts and executives to generate the kind of high-level strategic insights that drive business success.
Technical Explanation
The core of InsightBench is a set of enterprise dataset scenarios that agents must analyze to produce a series of actionable insights. Each scenario involves a dataset with multiple related tables, representing real-world business data like sales, marketing, and customer information.
The agents are tasked with going through a three-stage process:
-
Data Understanding: The agent must first explore the dataset, identify key entities and relationships, and develop an understanding of the underlying business context.
-
Hypothesis Generation: Based on their data analysis, the agent must propose a set of hypotheses that could explain important trends or patterns observed in the data.
-
Insight Communication: The agent must then present their top insights in a concise, easy-to-understand format, explaining the key takeaways and their potential business implications.
The benchmark evaluates agents on both the quality of their insights as well as the clarity and persuasiveness of their communication. This reflects the real-world need for analytics systems that can not only uncover hidden insights, but also package them in a way that facilitates effective decision-making by business stakeholders.
The researchers also introduce several variations of the core InsightBench task to assess different aspects of an agent's capabilities, such as their ability to handle missing data, incorporate domain knowledge, and adapt to changing business objectives.
Critical Analysis
The InsightBench framework represents an important step forward in benchmarking the capabilities of AI-powered business analytics tools. By focusing on the full lifecycle of insight generation, from data understanding to communication, it provides a more comprehensive and realistic assessment than previous benchmarks that only evaluated narrow technical skills.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the current implementation. For example, the datasets used in the benchmark, while based on real-world business scenarios, may not fully capture the complexity and messiness of data encountered in actual enterprise settings. Additionally, the evaluation criteria for assessing insight quality and communication effectiveness could benefit from further refinement and validation.
Another potential area for improvement is the incorporation of more advanced reasoning and knowledge integration capabilities. While the benchmark tests an agent's ability to generate hypotheses, it does not explicitly evaluate their capacity to reason about causal relationships or leverage external domain knowledge to enrich their analyses.
As the field of business analytics AI continues to evolve, it will be important for benchmarks like InsightBench to keep pace with the latest advancements in areas such as few-shot learning, commonsense reasoning, and multimodal data integration.
Conclusion
The InsightBench benchmark represents a significant step forward in the effort to develop AI systems that can truly partner with human analysts and executives to drive strategic business decision-making. By focusing on the full lifecycle of insight generation, from data understanding to communication, it provides a more realistic and comprehensive assessment of an agent's capabilities.
As AI continues to be increasingly integrated into the enterprise, tools like InsightBench will be crucial for ensuring that these systems can reliably uncover meaningful insights and present them in a way that facilitates effective business strategy. The researchers' work lays the groundwork for further advancements in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation
Gaurav Sahu, Abhay Puri, Juan Rodriguez, Alexandre Drouin, Perouz Taslakian, Valentina Zantedeschi, Alexandre Lacoste, David Vazquez, Nicolas Chapados, Christopher Pal, Sai Rajeswar Mudumba, Issam Hadj Laradji
Data analytics is essential for extracting valuable insights from data that can assist organizations in making effective decisions. We introduce InsightBench, a benchmark dataset with three key features. First, it consists of 31 datasets representing diverse business use cases such as finance and incident management, each accompanied by a carefully curated set of insights planted in the datasets. Second, unlike existing benchmarks focusing on answering single queries, InsightBench evaluates agents based on their ability to perform end-to-end data analytics, including formulating questions, interpreting answers, and generating a summary of insights and actionable steps. Third, we conducted comprehensive quality assurance to ensure that each dataset in the benchmark had clear goals and included relevant and meaningful questions and analysis. Furthermore, we implement a two-way evaluation mechanism using LLaMA-3-Eval as an effective, open-source evaluator method to assess agents' ability to extract insights. We also propose AgentPoirot, our baseline data analysis agent capable of performing end-to-end data analytics. Our evaluation on InsightBench shows that AgentPoirot outperforms existing approaches (such as Pandas Agent) that focus on resolving single queries. We also compare the performance of open- and closed-source LLMs and various evaluation strategies. Overall, this benchmark serves as a testbed to motivate further development in comprehensive data analytics and can be accessed here: https://github.com/ServiceNow/insight-bench.
Read more7/10/2024
0
DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents to Becoming Data Science Experts?
Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Wenhao Yu, Kaixin Ma, Hongming Zhang, Xinya Du, Dong Yu
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive language/vision reasoning abilities, igniting the recent trend of building agents for targeted applications such as shopping assistants or AI software engineers. Recently, many data science benchmarks have been proposed to investigate their performance in the data science domain. However, existing data science benchmarks still fall short when compared to real-world data science applications due to their simplified settings. To bridge this gap, we introduce DSBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate data science agents with realistic tasks. This benchmark includes 466 data analysis tasks and 74 data modeling tasks, sourced from Eloquence and Kaggle competitions. DSBench offers a realistic setting by encompassing long contexts, multimodal task backgrounds, reasoning with large data files and multi-table structures, and performing end-to-end data modeling tasks. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, LVLMs, and agents shows that they struggle with most tasks, with the best agent solving only 34.12% of data analysis tasks and achieving a 34.74% Relative Performance Gap (RPG). These findings underscore the need for further advancements in developing more practical, intelligent, and autonomous data science agents.
Read more9/14/2024
0
DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents
Benhao Huang, Yingzhuo Yu, Jin Huang, Xingjian Zhang, Jiaqi Ma
The quality of datasets plays an increasingly crucial role in the research and development of modern artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the proliferation of open dataset platforms nowadays, data quality issues, such as insufficient documentation, inaccurate annotations, and ethical concerns, remain common in datasets widely used in AI. Furthermore, these issues are often subtle and difficult to be detected by rule-based scripts, requiring expensive manual identification and verification by dataset users or maintainers. With the increasing capability of large language models (LLMs), it is promising to streamline the curation of datasets with LLM agents. In this work, as the initial step towards this goal, we propose a dataset curation agent benchmark, DCA-Bench, to measure LLM agents' capability of detecting hidden dataset quality issues. Specifically, we collect diverse real-world dataset quality issues from eight open dataset platforms as a testbed. Additionally, to establish an automatic pipeline for evaluating the success of LLM agents, which requires a nuanced understanding of the agent outputs, we implement a dedicated Evaluator using another LLM agent. We demonstrate that the LLM-based Evaluator empirically aligns well with human evaluation, allowing reliable automatic evaluation on the proposed benchmark. We further conduct experiments on several baseline LLM agents on the proposed benchmark and demonstrate the complexity of the task, indicating that applying LLMs to real-world dataset curation still requires further in-depth exploration and innovation. Finally, the proposed benchmark can also serve as a testbed for measuring the capability of LLMs in problem discovery rather than just problem-solving. The benchmark suite is available at url{https://github.com/TRAIS-Lab/dca-bench}.
Read more6/12/2024
🔄
0
WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Setting
Olly Styles, Sam Miller, Patricio Cerda-Mardini, Tanaya Guha, Victor Sanchez, Bertie Vidgen
We introduce WorkBench: a benchmark dataset for evaluating agents' ability to execute tasks in a workplace setting. WorkBench contains a sandbox environment with five databases, 26 tools, and 690 tasks. These tasks represent common business activities, such as sending emails and scheduling meetings. The tasks in WorkBench are challenging as they require planning, tool selection, and often multiple actions. If a task has been successfully executed, one (or more) of the database values may change. The correct outcome for each task is unique and unambiguous, which allows for robust, automated evaluation. We call this key contribution outcome-centric evaluation. We evaluate five existing ReAct agents on WorkBench, finding they successfully complete as few as 3% of tasks (Llama2-70B), and just 43% for the best-performing (GPT-4). We further find that agents' errors can result in the wrong action being taken, such as an email being sent to the wrong person. WorkBench reveals weaknesses in agents' ability to undertake common business activities, raising questions about their use in high-stakes workplace settings. WorkBench is publicly available as a free resource at https://github.com/olly-styles/WorkBench.
Read more5/3/2024