Interpretable Knowledge Tracing via Response Influence-based Counterfactual Reasoning
2312.10045
0
0
Abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) plays a crucial role in computer-aided education and intelligent tutoring systems, aiming to assess students' knowledge proficiency by predicting their future performance on new questions based on their past response records. While existing deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) methods have significantly improved prediction accuracy and achieved state-of-the-art results, they often suffer from a lack of interpretability. To address this limitation, current approaches have explored incorporating psychological influences to achieve more explainable predictions, but they tend to overlook the potential influences of historical responses. In fact, understanding how models make predictions based on response influences can enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of the knowledge tracing process, presenting an opportunity for a new paradigm of interpretable KT. However, measuring unobservable response influences is challenging. In this paper, we resort to counterfactual reasoning that intervenes in each response to answer textit{what if a student had answered a question incorrectly that he/she actually answered correctly, and vice versa}. Based on this, we propose RCKT, a novel response influence-based counterfactual knowledge tracing framework. RCKT generates response influences by comparing prediction outcomes from factual sequences and constructed counterfactual sequences after interventions. Additionally, we introduce maximization and inference techniques to leverage accumulated influences from different past responses, further improving the model's performance and credibility. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our RCKT method outperforms state-of-the-art knowledge tracing methods on four datasets against six baselines, and provides credible interpretations of response influences.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach for interpreting knowledge tracing models, which are used to predict student performance and learning.
- The authors introduce a method called "response influence-based counterfactual reasoning" that can explain how a student's previous responses influence their current performance.
- The approach aims to provide more transparency and interpretability for knowledge tracing models, which are often criticized for being "black boxes."
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge tracing is a way of modeling how students learn and retain information over time. These models can predict how well a student will perform on future questions based on their past performance. However, knowledge tracing models are often criticized for being difficult to interpret - it's not always clear why the model made a certain prediction.
The researchers in this paper have developed a new technique called "response influence-based counterfactual reasoning" to help make knowledge tracing models more interpretable. The key idea is to look at how a student's past responses influence their current performance. By understanding these "causal" relationships, the model can explain why it made a certain prediction.
For example, imagine a student struggles with a math concept early on, but then starts to improve. The model could use counterfactual reasoning to show that if the student had answered those early questions correctly, they would be predicted to perform better now. This gives teachers and students insight into how their past actions shaped their current knowledge state.
The researchers tested their approach on real student data and found that it provided more transparency and explainability compared to traditional knowledge tracing models. This could help teachers better understand their students' learning progression and provide more targeted support.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework for interpreting knowledge tracing models called "response influence-based counterfactual reasoning." The key idea is to use counterfactual inference to understand how a student's past responses influence their current and future performance.
Specifically, the authors propose a two-stage process:
-
Response Influence Modeling: First, they train a model to predict how a student's previous responses will impact their current response, using techniques like causal inference.
-
Counterfactual Reasoning: Second, they use these learned response influence relationships to generate counterfactual scenarios - i.e., how would the student's current performance change if their past responses had been different? This provides an interpretable explanation of the model's predictions.
The authors evaluate their approach on two real-world educational datasets and find that it outperforms traditional knowledge tracing models in terms of interpretation and transparency, while maintaining competitive predictive performance.
Critical Analysis
The authors make a compelling case for the need to improve the interpretability of knowledge tracing models. As these models become more widely adopted in educational settings, it is important that teachers and students can understand the reasoning behind the model's predictions.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on being able to accurately model the complex relationships between a student's past and current responses. This may be challenging, especially in cases where there are many confounding factors or hidden variables that influence student performance.
Additionally, the paper does not explore how the interpretations generated by the model would be presented and communicated to end-users (e.g., teachers, students). Further research may be needed to determine the most effective ways to convey the insights from the model in a way that is intuitive and actionable.
Finally, it would be interesting to see how the response influence-based counterfactual reasoning approach compares to other explainable AI techniques that have been applied to knowledge tracing, such as attention mechanisms or feature importance analysis. A more comprehensive survey of knowledge tracing models and their variants could help contextualize the contributions of this particular work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for making knowledge tracing models more interpretable and transparent. By using counterfactual reasoning to understand how a student's past responses influence their current and future performance, the authors aim to provide teachers and students with a clearer understanding of the factors driving model predictions.
While the proposed technique shows promise, further research is needed to address potential limitations and explore how the interpretations can be most effectively communicated to end-users. Overall, this work represents an important step towards developing more explainable and trustworthy educational AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
Explainable Few-shot Knowledge Tracing
Haoxuan Li, Jifan Yu, Yuanxin Ouyang, Zhuang Liu, Wenge Rong, Juanzi Li, Zhang Xiong
0
0
Knowledge tracing (KT), aiming to mine students' mastery of knowledge by their exercise records and predict their performance on future test questions, is a critical task in educational assessment. While researchers achieved tremendous success with the rapid development of deep learning techniques, current knowledge tracing tasks fall into the cracks from real-world teaching scenarios. Relying heavily on extensive student data and solely predicting numerical performances differs from the settings where teachers assess students' knowledge state from limited practices and provide explanatory feedback. To fill this gap, we explore a new task formulation: Explainable Few-shot Knowledge Tracing. By leveraging the powerful reasoning and generation abilities of large language models (LLMs), we then propose a cognition-guided framework that can track the student knowledge from a few student records while providing natural language explanations. Experimental results from three widely used datasets show that LLMs can perform comparable or superior to competitive deep knowledge tracing methods. We also discuss potential directions and call for future improvements in relevant topics.
5/28/2024
Leveraging Pedagogical Theories to Understand Student Learning Process with Graph-based Reasonable Knowledge Tracing
Jiajun Cui, Hong Qian, Bo Jiang, Wei Zhang
0
0
Knowledge tracing (KT) is a crucial task in intelligent education, focusing on predicting students' performance on given questions to trace their evolving knowledge. The advancement of deep learning in this field has led to deep-learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models that prioritize high predictive accuracy. However, many existing DLKT methods overlook the fundamental goal of tracking students' dynamical knowledge mastery. These models do not explicitly model knowledge mastery tracing processes or yield unreasonable results that educators find difficulty to comprehend and apply in real teaching scenarios. In response, our research conducts a preliminary analysis of mainstream KT approaches to highlight and explain such unreasonableness. We introduce GRKT, a graph-based reasonable knowledge tracing method to address these issues. By leveraging graph neural networks, our approach delves into the mutual influences of knowledge concepts, offering a more accurate representation of how the knowledge mastery evolves throughout the learning process. Additionally, we propose a fine-grained and psychological three-stage modeling process as knowledge retrieval, memory strengthening, and knowledge learning/forgetting, to conduct a more reasonable knowledge tracing process. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that GRKT outperforms eleven baselines across three datasets, not only enhancing predictive accuracy but also generating more reasonable knowledge tracing results. This makes our model a promising advancement for practical implementation in educational settings. The source code is available at https://github.com/JJCui96/GRKT.
6/21/2024
A Question-centric Multi-experts Contrastive Learning Framework for Improving the Accuracy and Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models
Hengyuan Zhang, Zitao Liu, Chenming Shang, Dawei Li, Yong Jiang
0
0
Knowledge tracing (KT) plays a crucial role in predicting students' future performance by analyzing their historical learning processes. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown great potential in solving the KT problem. However, there still exist some important challenges when applying deep learning techniques to model the KT process. The first challenge lies in taking the individual information of the question into modeling. This is crucial because, despite questions sharing the same knowledge component (KC), students' knowledge acquisition on homogeneous questions can vary significantly. The second challenge lies in interpreting the prediction results from existing deep learning-based KT models. In real-world applications, while it may not be necessary to have complete transparency and interpretability of the model parameters, it is crucial to present the model's prediction results in a manner that teachers find interpretable. This makes teachers accept the rationale behind the prediction results and utilize them to design teaching activities and tailored learning strategies for students. However, the inherent black-box nature of deep learning techniques often poses a hurdle for teachers to fully embrace the model's prediction results. To address these challenges, we propose a Question-centric Multi-experts Contrastive Learning framework for KT called Q-MCKT. We have provided all the datasets and code on our website at https://github.com/rattlesnakey/Q-MCKT.
6/21/2024
🤯
Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding
Zonghao Chen, Ruocheng Guo, Jean-Franc{c}ois Ton, Yang Liu
0
0
Personalized decision making requires the knowledge of potential outcomes under different treatments, and confidence intervals about the potential outcomes further enrich this decision-making process and improve its reliability in high-stakes scenarios. Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability, or need access to un-identifiable lower and upper bounds that characterize the difference between observational and interventional distributions. To overcome these limitations, we first propose a novel approach wTCP-DR based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees, even under hidden confounding. With less restrictive assumptions, our approach requires access to a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift from observational distributoin to interventional distribution. Theoretical results explicitly demonstrate the conditions under which our algorithm is strictly advantageous to the naive method that only uses interventional data. After ensuring valid intervals on counterfactuals, it is straightforward to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). We demonstrate our method across synthetic and real-world data, including recommendation systems, to verify the superiority of our methods compared against state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both coverage and efficiency
5/22/2024