Intertwining CP and NLP: The Generation of Unreasonably Constrained Sentences
2406.15473
0
0
Abstract
Constrained text generation remains a challenging task, particularly when dealing with hard constraints. Traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches prioritize generating meaningful and coherent output. Also, the current state-of-the-art methods often lack the expressiveness and constraint satisfaction capabilities to handle such tasks effectively. This paper presents the Constraints First Framework to remedy this issue. This framework considers a constrained text generation problem as a discrete combinatorial optimization problem. It is solved by a constraint programming method that combines linguistic properties (e.g., n-grams or language level) with other more classical constraints (e.g., the number of characters, syllables, or words). Eventually, a curation phase allows for selecting the best-generated sentences according to perplexity using a large language model. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated by tackling a new more tediously constrained text generation problem: the iconic RADNER sentences problem. This problem aims to generate sentences respecting a set of quite strict rules defined by their use in vision and clinical research. Thanks to our CP-based approach, many new strongly constrained sentences have been successfully generated in an automatic manner. This highlights the potential of our approach to handle unreasonably constrained text generation scenarios.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the intersection of Constraint Programming (CP) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), focusing on the generation of "unreasonably constrained sentences" - sentences that are grammatically correct but highly unusual or unlikely to occur in natural language.
- The researchers investigate techniques to generate such sentences, which can be used to test the capabilities and limitations of NLP systems.
- The paper touches on topics related to text generation explainability, neural data-to-text generation, and scaling synthetic logical reasoning datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the intersection of two fields: Constraint Programming (CP) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). CP is a way of solving complex problems by defining a set of constraints, while NLP is the study of how computers can understand and generate human language.
The researchers were interested in generating "unreasonably constrained sentences" - sentences that are grammatically correct but very unusual or unlikely to appear in natural language. They wanted to explore techniques for producing these kinds of sentences, which could then be used to test the capabilities and limitations of NLP systems.
For example, the sentence "The green side of the round triangle ate the spicy banana" is grammatically correct but doesn't make much sense in the real world. Generating and analyzing these types of sentences can help researchers understand the strengths and weaknesses of language models and other NLP technologies.
The paper also connects to other areas of research, such as text generation explainability, which looks at making AI-generated text more understandable, and scaling synthetic logical reasoning datasets, which explores building larger datasets of logical reasoning problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of "unreasonably constrained sentences" - sentences that are grammatically correct but highly unusual or unlikely to occur in natural language. The researchers propose that generating and analyzing such sentences can be a valuable tool for testing the capabilities and limitations of NLP systems.
The authors then present a framework for generating these unreasonably constrained sentences using a combination of Constraint Programming (CP) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. They first define a set of linguistic constraints, such as part-of-speech patterns and semantic coherence, and then use CP solvers to generate sentences that satisfy these constraints.
The generated sentences are then evaluated using various NLP metrics, such as perplexity and semantic similarity, to assess their degree of "unreasonableness." The researchers also explore techniques for enhancing sentence embeddings to better capture the nuances of these unusual sentences.
The paper also discusses the potential applications of this approach, such as controllable text generation and the creation of synthetic logical reasoning datasets. The authors suggest that the generation of unreasonably constrained sentences could be a valuable tool for advancing the state-of-the-art in NLP.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to testing the capabilities of NLP systems, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One potential concern is the reliance on predefined linguistic constraints, which may not fully capture the nuances of natural language. The authors note that the generation of truly "unreasonable" sentences is a challenging task and that there may be inherent biases in the way the constraints are defined.
Additionally, the evaluation of the generated sentences using NLP metrics may not fully capture the subjective human perception of "unreasonableness." The paper suggests that further research is needed to develop more robust evaluation frameworks that better align with human intuitions.
Another area for further exploration is the potential applications of this approach, such as controllable text generation and the creation of synthetic reasoning datasets. The paper provides some initial insights, but more work is needed to fully realize the potential of this technique.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and innovative approach to testing NLP systems, but it also highlights the ongoing challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This paper explores the intersection of Constraint Programming (CP) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) by proposing a framework for generating "unreasonably constrained sentences" - sentences that are grammatically correct but highly unusual or unlikely to occur in natural language.
The researchers demonstrate how this technique can be used to test the capabilities and limitations of NLP systems, potentially advancing the state-of-the-art in areas such as text generation explainability, neural data-to-text generation, and scaling synthetic logical reasoning datasets.
While the paper presents a promising approach, it also highlights the ongoing challenges in this field, such as the difficulty of fully capturing the nuances of natural language and the need for more robust evaluation frameworks. The authors suggest that further research is needed to fully realize the potential of this technique, but their work represents an important step forward in the intersection of CP and NLP.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding
Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu, Rui Meng, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation. However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models. Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest. While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention. In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions. The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keyword-constrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023).
6/27/2024
๐ธ
Challenges and Opportunities in Text Generation Explainability
Kenza Amara, Rita Sevastjanova, Mennatallah El-Assady
0
0
The necessity for interpretability in natural language processing (NLP) has risen alongside the growing prominence of large language models. Among the myriad tasks within NLP, text generation stands out as a primary objective of autoregressive models. The NLP community has begun to take a keen interest in gaining a deeper understanding of text generation, leading to the development of model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) methods tailored to this task. The design and evaluation of explainability methods are non-trivial since they depend on many factors involved in the text generation process, e.g., the autoregressive model and its stochastic nature. This paper outlines 17 challenges categorized into three groups that arise during the development and assessment of attribution-based explainability methods. These challenges encompass issues concerning tokenization, defining explanation similarity, determining token importance and prediction change metrics, the level of human intervention required, and the creation of suitable test datasets. The paper illustrates how these challenges can be intertwined, showcasing new opportunities for the community. These include developing probabilistic word-level explainability methods and engaging humans in the explainability pipeline, from the data design to the final evaluation, to draw robust conclusions on xAI methods.
5/15/2024
๐ง
Innovations in Neural Data-to-text Generation: A Survey
Mandar Sharma, Ajay Gogineni, Naren Ramakrishnan
0
0
The neural boom that has sparked natural language processing (NLP) research through the last decade has similarly led to significant innovations in data-to-text generation (DTG). This survey offers a consolidated view into the neural DTG paradigm with a structured examination of the approaches, benchmark datasets, and evaluation protocols. This survey draws boundaries separating DTG from the rest of the natural language generation (NLG) landscape, encompassing an up-to-date synthesis of the literature, and highlighting the stages of technological adoption from within and outside the greater NLG umbrella. With this holistic view, we highlight promising avenues for DTG research that not only focus on the design of linguistically capable systems but also systems that exhibit fairness and accountability.
4/3/2024
๐งช
Scaling Synthetic Logical Reasoning Datasets with Context-Sensitive Declarative Grammars
Damien Sileo
0
0
Logical reasoning remains a challenge for natural language processing, but it can be improved by training language models to mimic theorem provers on procedurally generated problems. Previous work used domain-specific proof generation algorithms, which biases reasoning toward specific proof traces and limits auditability and extensibility. We present a simpler and more general declarative framework with flexible context-sensitive rules binding multiple languages (specifically, simplified English and the TPTP theorem-proving language). We construct first-order logic problems by selecting up to 32 premises and one hypothesis. We demonstrate that using semantic constraints during generation and careful English verbalization of predicates enhances logical reasoning without hurting natural English tasks. We use relatively small DeBERTa-v3 models to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the FOLIO human-authored logic dataset, surpassing GPT-4 in accuracy with or without an external solver by 12%.
6/18/2024