Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding
2312.06149
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation. However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models. Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest. While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention. In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions. The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keyword-constrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023).
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a constrained approach to text generation using large language models, which aims to improve the faithfulness of the generated text to the given prompts and constraints.
- The key idea is to estimate the satisfaction of future constraints during decoding, and use this information to guide the language model towards generating text that better aligns with the desired properties.
- Experiments on various text generation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in improving the fidelity of the generated text while maintaining high quality.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models [like the ones used in <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/how-you-prompt-matters-even-task-oriented">task-oriented applications</a>] are powerful at generating human-like text, but they can sometimes struggle to produce content that is truly faithful to the original prompt or desired constraints. This paper introduces a new technique to address this challenge.
The core idea is to have the language model continuously evaluate how well the text it is generating will satisfy the given constraints, even before the full text is complete. This allows the model to make more informed decisions during the text generation process, steering it towards outputs that better match the intended goals.
For example, imagine you ask the model to write a short story about a character going on a journey. Without the special technique in this paper, the model might generate a story that starts off well but then drifts away from the core premise as it continues. But with this new approach, the model would be able to monitor how well the story is sticking to the "journey" theme and make adjustments to keep the text more aligned.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique across a range of text generation tasks, showing that it can produce higher-quality outputs that are more faithful to the original prompts and constraints. This represents an important step forward in [empowering large language models to handle more <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/empowering-large-language-models-textual-data-augmentation">complex textual generation tasks</a>].
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of a "constraint satisfaction estimation" module that is integrated into the text generation process of a large language model. This module is trained to predict how well the future continuation of the generated text will satisfy the given constraints, such as the topic, tone, or other specified properties.
During decoding, this constraint satisfaction estimate is used to guide the language model's token selections, nudging it towards generating text that is more likely to align with the desired constraints. The authors experiment with different ways of incorporating this estimate, including using it as an additional input to the language model or as a reward signal to steer the beam search.
Evaluations on tasks like story generation, abstractive summarization, and open-ended text completion demonstrate the effectiveness of this constrained decoding approach. Compared to standard language model decoding, the technique is able to produce text that is [more controllable and faithful to the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/controllable-text-generation-instruction-tuning-era">specified instructions</a>], while maintaining high quality and coherence.
The authors also investigate the model's [ability to handle <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/exploring-capabilities-prompted-large-language-models-educational">diverse prompts and constraints</a>], showing that the technique is generally applicable and can be adapted to different types of text generation scenarios.
Critical Analysis
The proposed constrained decoding approach represents an important step forward in improving the faithfulness and controllability of text generation with large language models. By incorporating an explicit estimate of future constraint satisfaction, the model is able to make more informed decisions during the generation process, leading to outputs that better match the desired properties.
That said, the paper does not extensively explore the limitations or potential failure modes of this technique. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the constraint satisfaction estimation module performs under different types of prompts or constraints, and whether there are cases where it could lead the model astray.
Additionally, the authors focus primarily on evaluating the technique through automatic metrics, but it would be interesting to also get human assessments of the generated text in terms of its coherence, relevance, and overall alignment with the prompts. This could uncover nuanced ways in which the constrained decoding approach succeeds or falls short.
Finally, the paper does not delve into the computational and memory costs of the added constraint satisfaction estimation module. As large language models continue to grow in size and complexity, the efficiency of text generation techniques will become an increasingly important consideration.
Overall, this work represents a promising direction for [guiding large language models to generate text that is more <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/guiding-large-language-models-to-generate-computer">aligned with specific objectives</a>. Further exploration of its limitations and tradeoffs could lead to even more robust and widely applicable text generation capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a constrained decoding approach that aims to improve the faithfulness of text generation with large language models. By incorporating an explicit estimate of future constraint satisfaction, the technique is able to steer the model towards generating output that better aligns with the given prompts and desired properties.
Experiments on various text generation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, showing that it can produce higher-quality and more controllable text compared to standard language model decoding. While the paper does not fully explore the limitations of the technique, it represents an important step forward in [enhancing the capabilities of large language models for a wide range of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/exploring-capabilities-prompted-large-language-models-educational">text generation applications</a>.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
How You Prompt Matters! Even Task-Oriented Constraints in Instructions Affect LLM-Generated Text Detection
Ryuto Koike, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki
0
0
To combat the misuse of Large Language Models (LLMs), many recent studies have presented LLM-generated-text detectors with promising performance. When users instruct LLMs to generate texts, the instruction can include different constraints depending on the user's need. However, most recent studies do not cover such diverse instruction patterns when creating datasets for LLM detection. In this paper, we reveal that even task-oriented constraints -- constraints that would naturally be included in an instruction and are not related to detection-evasion -- cause existing powerful detectors to have a large variance in detection performance. We focus on student essay writing as a realistic domain and manually create task-oriented constraints based on several factors for essay quality. Our experiments show that the standard deviation (SD) of current detector performance on texts generated by an instruction with such a constraint is significantly larger (up to an SD of 14.4 F1-score) than that by generating texts multiple times or paraphrasing the instruction. We also observe an overall trend where the constraints can make LLM detection more challenging than without them. Finally, our analysis indicates that the high instruction-following ability of LLMs fosters the large impact of such constraints on detection performance.
6/13/2024
Empowering Large Language Models for Textual Data Augmentation
Yichuan Li, Kaize Ding, Jianling Wang, Kyumin Lee
0
0
With the capabilities of understanding and executing natural language instructions, Large language models (LLMs) can potentially act as a powerful tool for textual data augmentation. However, the quality of augmented data depends heavily on the augmentation instructions provided, and the effectiveness can fluctuate across different downstream tasks. While manually crafting and selecting instructions can offer some improvement, this approach faces scalability and consistency issues in practice due to the diversity of downstream tasks. In this work, we address these limitations by proposing a new solution, which can automatically generate a large pool of augmentation instructions and select the most suitable task-informed instructions, thereby empowering LLMs to create high-quality augmented data for different downstream tasks. Empirically, the proposed approach consistently generates augmented data with better quality compared to non-LLM and LLM-based data augmentation methods, leading to the best performance on 26 few-shot learning tasks sourced from a wide range of application domains.
4/30/2024
Controllable Text Generation in the Instruction-Tuning Era
Dhananjay Ashok, Barnabas Poczos
0
0
While most research on controllable text generation has focused on steering base Language Models, the emerging instruction-tuning and prompting paradigm offers an alternate approach to controllability. We compile and release ConGenBench, a testbed of 17 different controllable generation tasks, using a subset of it to benchmark the performance of 9 different baselines and methods on Instruction-tuned Language Models. To our surprise, we find that prompting-based approaches outperform controllable text generation methods on most datasets and tasks, highlighting a need for research on controllable text generation with Instruction-tuned Language Models in specific. Prompt-based approaches match human performance on most stylistic tasks while lagging on structural tasks, foregrounding a need to study more varied constraints and more challenging stylistic tasks. To facilitate such research, we provide an algorithm that uses only a task dataset and a Large Language Model with in-context capabilities to automatically generate a constraint dataset. This method eliminates the fields dependence on pre-curated constraint datasets, hence vastly expanding the range of constraints that can be studied in the future.
5/3/2024
💬
Exploring the Capabilities of Prompted Large Language Models in Educational and Assessment Applications
Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy, Sudeshna Sarkar
0
0
In the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the fusion of large language models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for innovation in the field of modern education. We embark on an exploration of prompted LLMs within the context of educational and assessment applications to uncover their potential. Through a series of carefully crafted research questions, we investigate the effectiveness of prompt-based techniques in generating open-ended questions from school-level textbooks, assess their efficiency in generating open-ended questions from undergraduate-level technical textbooks, and explore the feasibility of employing a chain-of-thought inspired multi-stage prompting approach for language-agnostic multiple-choice question (MCQ) generation. Additionally, we evaluate the ability of prompted LLMs for language learning, exemplified through a case study in the low-resource Indian language Bengali, to explain Bengali grammatical errors. We also evaluate the potential of prompted LLMs to assess human resource (HR) spoken interview transcripts. By juxtaposing the capabilities of LLMs with those of human experts across various educational tasks and domains, our aim is to shed light on the potential and limitations of LLMs in reshaping educational practices.
5/21/2024