Intervention and Conditioning in Causal Bayesian Networks

Read original: arXiv:2405.14728 - Published 5/24/2024 by Sainyam Galhotra, Joseph Y. Halpern

🧪

Overview

Causal models are crucial for understanding complex systems and identifying causal relationships
Calculating probabilities involving interventions in causal models is challenging
This paper shows that by making simple yet often realistic independence assumptions, it's possible to uniquely estimate the probability of an interventional formula, which can be evaluated using observational data

Plain English Explanation

Causal models are tools that help us understand how different factors in a complex system are connected and influence each other. They allow us to identify the underlying causes of various outcomes. However, calculating the probabilities of certain scenarios, especially those involving interventions or changes to the system, can be very difficult.

This paper presents a new approach that makes it easier to calculate these probabilities. The key is to make some reasonable assumptions about the independence of certain factors in the system. By doing this, the researchers were able to find a way to uniquely determine the probability of an "interventional formula" - a mathematical expression that describes the effects of an intervention.

Importantly, this new method means that these probability estimates can often be calculated using only observational data, without needing to conduct expensive or impractical experiments. This is a significant advantage, as experiments are not always feasible, especially for complex real-world systems.

Technical Explanation

Causal Bayesian Networks (CBNs) are a popular type of causal model that rely on the assumption of autonomous mechanisms to calculate probabilities involving interventions. This paper shows that by making simple yet often realistic independence assumptions, it is possible to uniquely estimate the probability of an interventional formula, including the concepts of probability of sufficiency and necessity.

The researchers discuss when these independence assumptions are appropriate and how they can be evaluated using observational data alone. This is highly significant, as conducting experiments to measure the effects of interventions is often impractical or unfeasible, especially for complex systems. By relying on observational data, this new method can be applied more widely to study causal relationships in the real world.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to estimating probabilities in causal models, but it's important to consider the limitations and potential issues. The independence assumptions, while often realistic, may not hold true in all scenarios, particularly for highly complex or non-deterministic systems. Additionally, the method relies on the availability of observational data, which may be biased or incomplete, leading to potential issues with confounding.

Further research is needed to explore the robustness of this approach under different conditions, as well as to investigate alternative methods for estimating probabilities in causal models. Nonetheless, the ideas presented in this paper represent an important step forward in addressing the challenges of causal reasoning and inference.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to estimating probabilities in causal models by leveraging simple independence assumptions. This approach can often be applied using only observational data, which is a significant advantage over methods that require expensive or impractical experiments.

While the method has some limitations, it represents an important contribution to the field of causal reasoning and inference. By making causal analysis more accessible and practical, this research has the potential to enhance our understanding of complex systems and inform decision-making in a wide range of domains.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

Intervention and Conditioning in Causal Bayesian Networks

Sainyam Galhotra, Joseph Y. Halpern

Causal models are crucial for understanding complex systems and identifying causal relationships among variables. Even though causal models are extremely popular, conditional probability calculation of formulas involving interventions pose significant challenges. In case of Causal Bayesian Networks (CBNs), Pearl assumes autonomy of mechanisms that determine interventions to calculate a range of probabilities. We show that by making simple yet often realistic independence assumptions, it is possible to uniquely estimate the probability of an interventional formula (including the well-studied notions of probability of sufficiency and necessity). We discuss when these assumptions are appropriate. Importantly, in many cases of interest, when the assumptions are appropriate, these probability estimates can be evaluated using observational data, which carries immense significance in scenarios where conducting experiments is impractical or unfeasible.

5/24/2024

Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery

Yuxuan Wang, Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Wei Wang, Yizhou Wang

Causal discovery is crucial for understanding complex systems and informing decisions. While observational data can uncover causal relationships under certain assumptions, it often falls short, making active interventions necessary. Current methods, such as Bayesian and graph-theoretical approaches, do not prioritize decision-making and often rely on ideal conditions or information gain, which is not directly related to hypothesis testing. We propose a novel Bayesian optimization-based method inspired by Bayes factors that aims to maximize the probability of obtaining decisive and correct evidence. Our approach uses observational data to estimate causal models under different hypotheses, evaluates potential interventions pre-experimentally, and iteratively updates priors to refine interventions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through various experiments. Our contributions provide a robust framework for efficient causal discovery through active interventions, enhancing the practical application of theoretical advancements.

6/18/2024

🤖

Characterising Interventions in Causal Games

Manuj Mishra, James Fox, Michael Wooldridge

Causal games are probabilistic graphical models that enable causal queries to be answered in multi-agent settings. They extend causal Bayesian networks by specifying decision and utility variables to represent the agents' degrees of freedom and objectives. In multi-agent settings, whether each agent decides on their policy before or after knowing the causal intervention is important as this affects whether they can respond to the intervention by adapting their policy. Consequently, previous work in causal games imposed chronological constraints on permissible interventions. We relax this by outlining a sound and complete set of primitive causal interventions so the effect of any arbitrarily complex interventional query can be studied in multi-agent settings. We also demonstrate applications to the design of safe AI systems by considering causal mechanism design and commitment.

6/14/2024

Estimating Causal Effects from Learned Causal Networks

Anna Raichev, Alexander Ihler, Jin Tian, Rina Dechter

The standard approach to answering an identifiable causal-effect query (e.g., $P(Y|do(X)$) when given a causal diagram and observational data is to first generate an estimand, or probabilistic expression over the observable variables, which is then evaluated using the observational data. In this paper, we propose an alternative paradigm for answering causal-effect queries over discrete observable variables. We propose to instead learn the causal Bayesian network and its confounding latent variables directly from the observational data. Then, efficient probabilistic graphical model (PGM) algorithms can be applied to the learned model to answer queries. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that this emph{model completion} learning approach can be more effective than estimand approaches, particularly for larger models in which the estimand expressions become computationally difficult. We illustrate our method's potential using a benchmark collection of Bayesian networks and synthetically generated causal models.

8/28/2024