Intrinsic Biologically Plausible Adversarial Robustness

Overview

• Artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained with backpropagation (BP) are powerful tools for various tasks, but they have a concerning vulnerability: small, targeted changes to their inputs can drastically disrupt their performance.
• Adversarial training, where the training data is augmented with adversarial samples, can help mitigate this issue, but it is computationally costly.
• Humans do not seem susceptible to this same adversarial vulnerability, leading to the hypothesis that biologically-plausible trained ANNs might be more robust.
• This paper investigates a biologically-inspired learning algorithm called PEPITA and compares its adversarial robustness to BP-trained ANNs.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are a type of machine learning model that can be trained to excel at various tasks, such as image recognition or language processing. These models are trained using a technique called backpropagation (BP), which allows them to learn and improve their performance over time.

However, researchers have discovered a concerning vulnerability in BP-trained ANNs: small, targeted changes to the input data can cause the model to make completely incorrect predictions. These modified inputs, known as adversarial samples, can fool the model in a way that humans would never be fooled.

To address this issue, researchers have developed a technique called adversarial training, where the model is trained on a mix of regular and adversarial samples. This makes the model more robust to these adversarial attacks, but it also comes at a high computational cost.

In contrast, humans do not seem to be susceptible to these same adversarial attacks. This suggests that biologically-plausible trained ANNs might be more naturally robust to adversarial inputs.

This paper explores a biologically-inspired learning algorithm called PEPITA and compares its adversarial robustness to that of BP-trained ANNs. The researchers find that PEPITA has a higher intrinsic adversarial robustness and, when adversarially trained, also has a more favorable natural-vs-adversarial performance trade-off compared to BP.

Technical Explanation

In this work, the researchers chose the biologically-plausible learning algorithm PEPITA (Present the Error to Perturb the Input To modulate Activity) as a case study and investigated its adversarial robustness through a comparative analysis with BP-trained ANNs on various computer vision tasks.

The researchers observed that PEPITA has a higher intrinsic adversarial robustness compared to BP-trained ANNs. When both models were adversarially trained, PEPITA also exhibited a more favorable natural-vs-adversarial performance trade-off. Specifically, for the MNIST task, PEPITA's adversarial accuracies decreased by only 0.26% on average for the same natural accuracies, while BP's decreased by 8.05%.

This suggests that biologically-plausible trained ANNs might be more robust to adversarial attacks than their BP-trained counterparts. The researchers hypothesize that this could be due to the different learning dynamics and architectural properties of PEPITA compared to BP-trained ANNs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a promising avenue for improving the adversarial robustness of ANNs by exploring biologically-plausible learning algorithms. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a few computer vision tasks and that further investigation is needed to understand the precise mechanisms behind PEPITA's improved robustness.

Additionally, while the results suggest that PEPITA may be more naturally robust to adversarial attacks, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or trade-offs of this approach. It would be valuable to understand how PEPITA's performance compares to BP-trained ANNs on a wider range of tasks and whether there are any performance or computational drawbacks to using the biologically-inspired algorithm.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising approach to improving the adversarial robustness of artificial neural networks by exploring biologically-plausible learning algorithms. The researchers found that the PEPITA algorithm exhibits higher intrinsic adversarial robustness and a more favorable natural-vs-adversarial performance trade-off compared to backpropagation-trained ANNs.

These findings suggest that biologically-inspired neural network models may be a fruitful direction for further research into developing more robust and secure AI systems. However, additional investigation is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader implications of this approach.