Investigating Calibration and Corruption Robustness of Post-hoc Pruned Perception CNNs: An Image Classification Benchmark Study
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the calibration and corruption robustness of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image classification after post-hoc pruning.
- The authors benchmark different pruning methods and analyze the impact on model performance, calibration, and robustness to common image corruptions.
- The findings provide insights into the trade-offs between model size, accuracy, and robustness, which can inform the development of more reliable and efficient AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks, like the ones used for image classification, can sometimes be too large and complex, with many unnecessary parameters that don't contribute much to the model's performance. Pruning is a technique to remove these unnecessary parts, making the model smaller and more efficient.
However, pruning can also affect the model's reliability and robustness - its ability to perform well even when the input images are slightly distorted or corrupted, like by noise or blur. This paper explores the impact of different pruning methods on the calibration (how well the model's confidence matches its accuracy) and corruption robustness of image classification CNNs.
The researchers benchmarked several pruning techniques and analyzed the trade-offs between model size, accuracy, calibration, and robustness. Their findings can help developers create more reliable and efficient AI systems that can perform well even in the face of real-world challenges, like noisy or low-quality images.
Technical Explanation
The authors evaluated the performance, calibration, and corruption robustness of CNNs for image classification after applying different pruning methods, including layer-wise adaptive rates, cost-effective fault tolerance, and random L1 pruning.
They tested the pruned models on standard image classification datasets and a suite of common image corruptions, such as noise, blur, and weather effects. The authors measured the models' accuracy, calibration (using metrics like expected calibration error), and robustness to corruptions (using corruption error).
The results showed that different pruning methods had varying impacts on the models' performance, calibration, and corruption robustness. Some pruning techniques were able to maintain high accuracy and calibration, while others led to significant degradation in these metrics. The authors also found that pruning could sometimes improve the models' corruption robustness, depending on the specific pruning method and the type of corruption.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive benchmark of pruning methods for image classification CNNs, but there are some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The experiments were conducted on a limited set of datasets and corruption types, so the findings may not generalize to a broader range of real-world scenarios. Pruning robust concept erasing diffusion models could be an interesting extension to explore.
-
The paper does not explore the underlying mechanisms by which different pruning methods affect calibration and corruption robustness. Further research is needed to develop a deeper understanding of these relationships.
-
The authors mention that some pruning methods may introduce instability or sensitivity to the initialization of the remaining weights. This could be an important consideration for practical deployment of pruned models.
Overall, this paper presents valuable insights into the trade-offs between model size, accuracy, calibration, and robustness, which can inform the development of more reliable and efficient AI systems. However, additional research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between pruning, model performance, and real-world deployment considerations.
Conclusion
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the calibration and corruption robustness of image classification CNNs after applying different pruning methods. The findings suggest that the choice of pruning technique can have a significant impact on a model's performance, reliability, and ability to handle challenging real-world conditions.
The insights from this research can help inform the development of more efficient and robust AI systems, which is crucial as these technologies become increasingly integrated into various applications and decision-making processes. By understanding the trade-offs between model size, accuracy, and robustness, practitioners can make more informed decisions about model design and deployment, ultimately leading to more trustworthy and reliable AI-powered solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Investigating Calibration and Corruption Robustness of Post-hoc Pruned Perception CNNs: An Image Classification Benchmark Study
Pallavi Mitra, Gesina Schwalbe, Nadja Klein
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many computer vision tasks. However, high computational and storage demands hinder their deployment into resource-constrained environments, such as embedded devices. Model pruning helps to meet these restrictions by reducing the model size, while maintaining superior performance. Meanwhile, safety-critical applications pose more than just resource and performance constraints. In particular, predictions must not be overly confident, i.e., provide properly calibrated uncertainty estimations (proper uncertainty calibration), and CNNs must be robust against corruptions like naturally occurring input perturbations (natural corruption robustness). This work investigates the important trade-off between uncertainty calibration, natural corruption robustness, and performance for current state-of-research post-hoc CNN pruning techniques in the context of image classification tasks. Our study reveals that post-hoc pruning substantially improves the model's uncertainty calibration, performance, and natural corruption robustness, sparking hope for safe and robust embedded CNNs.Furthermore, uncertainty calibration and natural corruption robustness are not mutually exclusive targets under pruning, as evidenced by the improved safety aspects obtained by post-hoc unstructured pruning with increasing compression.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Robust Data Pruning: Uncovering and Overcoming Implicit Bias
Artem Vysogorets, Kartik Ahuja, Julia Kempe
In the era of exceptionally data-hungry models, careful selection of the training data is essential to mitigate the extensive costs of deep learning. Data pruning offers a solution by removing redundant or uninformative samples from the dataset, which yields faster convergence and improved neural scaling laws. However, little is known about its impact on classification bias of the trained models. We conduct the first systematic study of this effect and reveal that existing data pruning algorithms can produce highly biased classifiers. At the same time, we argue that random data pruning with appropriate class ratios has potential to improve the worst-class performance. We propose a fairness-aware approach to pruning and empirically demonstrate its performance on standard computer vision benchmarks. In sharp contrast to existing algorithms, our proposed method continues improving robustness at a tolerable drop of average performance as we prune more from the datasets. We present theoretical analysis of the classification risk in a mixture of Gaussians to further motivate our algorithm and support our findings.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Confident magnitude-based neural network pruning
Joaquin Alvarez
Pruning neural networks has proven to be a successful approach to increase the efficiency and reduce the memory storage of deep learning models without compromising performance. Previous literature has shown that it is possible to achieve a sizable reduction in the number of parameters of a deep neural network without deteriorating its predictive capacity in one-shot pruning regimes. Our work builds beyond this background in order to provide rigorous uncertainty quantification for pruning neural networks reliably, which has not been addressed to a great extent in previous literature focusing on pruning methods in computer vision settings. We leverage recent techniques on distribution-free uncertainty quantification to provide finite-sample statistical guarantees to compress deep neural networks, while maintaining high performance. Moreover, this work presents experiments in computer vision tasks to illustrate how uncertainty-aware pruning is a useful approach to deploy sparse neural networks safely.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Purification Of Contaminated Convolutional Neural Networks Via Robust Recovery: An Approach with Theoretical Guarantee in One-Hidden-Layer Case
Hanxiao Lu, Zeyu Huang, Ren Wang
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), one of the key architectures of deep learning models, have achieved superior performance on many machine learning tasks such as image classification, video recognition, and power systems. Despite their success, CNNs can be easily contaminated by natural noises and artificially injected noises such as backdoor attacks. In this paper, we propose a robust recovery method to remove the noise from the potentially contaminated CNNs and provide an exact recovery guarantee on one-hidden-layer non-overlapping CNNs with the rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function. Our theoretical results show that both CNNs' weights and biases can be exactly recovered under the overparameterization setting with some mild assumptions. The experimental results demonstrate the correctness of the proofs and the effectiveness of the method in both the synthetic environment and the practical neural network setting. Our results also indicate that the proposed method can be extended to multiple-layer CNNs and potentially serve as a defense strategy against backdoor attacks.
Read more7/17/2024