Investigating Interaction Modes and User Agency in Human-LLM Collaboration for Domain-Specific Data Analysis
2405.05548
0
0
📊
Abstract
Despite demonstrating robust capabilities in performing tasks related to general-domain data-operation tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) may exhibit shortcomings when applied to domain-specific tasks. We consider the design of domain-specific AI-powered data analysis tools from two dimensions: interaction and user agency. We implemented two design probes that fall on the two ends of the two dimensions: an open-ended high agency (OHA) prototype and a structured low agency (SLA) prototype. We conducted an interview study with nine data scientists to investigate (1) how users perceived the LLM outputs for data analysis assistance, and (2) how the two test design probes, OHA and SLA, affected user behavior, performance, and perceptions. Our study revealed insights regarding participants' interactions with LLMs, how they perceived the results, and their desire for explainability concerning LLM outputs, along with a noted need for collaboration with other users, and how they envisioned the utility of LLMs in their workflow.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the design of domain-specific AI-powered data analysis tools, focusing on the dimensions of interaction and user agency.
- The researchers implemented two design probes - an open-ended high agency (OHA) prototype and a structured low agency (SLA) prototype - to investigate how users perceive and interact with Large Language Models (LLMs) for data analysis assistance.
- The study involved interviews with nine data scientists to understand their experiences, perceptions, and desired features for LLM-powered data analysis tools.
Plain English Explanation
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general-domain data-operation tasks. However, when applied to more specific, domain-focused tasks, they may exhibit shortcomings. This paper explores ways to design AI-powered data analysis tools that can better support domain-specific needs.
The researchers looked at two key aspects: interaction and user agency. They created two different prototypes to represent the extremes of these dimensions. The OHA prototype allowed for open-ended, high-agency interactions, while the SLA prototype provided a more structured, low-agency experience.
The researchers then interviewed nine data scientists to understand how they perceived the LLM outputs, how the prototypes affected their behavior and performance, and what features they would want in an LLM-powered data analysis tool. The study revealed insights into the users' desire for explainability, the need for collaboration with other users, and their vision for how LLMs could be integrated into their workflows.
Technical Explanation
The researchers designed two prototypes to investigate the impact of interaction and user agency on the use of LLMs for data analysis tasks:
- Open-Ended High Agency (OHA) Prototype: This prototype allowed for open-ended, high-agency interactions, where users could freely engage with the LLM and guide the analysis process.
- Structured Low Agency (SLA) Prototype: This prototype provided a more structured, low-agency experience, with the LLM playing a more directive role in the analysis process.
The researchers then conducted interviews with nine data scientists to understand their perceptions, behaviors, and performance when using these prototypes. The study aimed to explore:
- How users perceived the LLM outputs for data analysis assistance.
- How the OHA and SLA prototypes affected user behavior, performance, and perceptions.
The interviews revealed insights into the participants' desire for explainability, the need for collaboration with other users, and their vision for integrating LLMs into their data analysis workflows.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the design of domain-specific AI-powered data analysis tools, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The study focused on a relatively small sample size of nine data scientists, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Expanding the study to a larger and more diverse participant pool could provide additional insights.
- The prototypes used in the study represented the extremes of the interaction and user agency dimensions, but there may be intermediate design approaches that could offer a better balance between these factors.
- The study did not explore the long-term impacts of using LLM-powered data analysis tools on user productivity, decision-making, and overall workflow integration. Longitudinal studies would be helpful in understanding these aspects.
- The paper does not delve into the technical details of the LLM architecture or the specific algorithms used in the prototypes. Further research could investigate the performance and limitations of different LLM-based approaches for domain-specific data analysis tasks.
Despite these limitations, the study provides a valuable starting point for understanding how users perceive and interact with LLMs in the context of domain-specific data analysis. The insights gained can inform the design of more effective and user-centric AI-powered data analysis tools.
Conclusion
This paper explores the design of domain-specific AI-powered data analysis tools, focusing on the dimensions of interaction and user agency. By implementing two design probes (the OHA prototype and the SLA prototype), the researchers gained valuable insights into how users perceive and interact with LLMs for data analysis tasks.
The study revealed users' desire for explainability, the need for collaboration with other users, and their vision for integrating LLMs into their data analysis workflows. These findings can inform the development of more effective and user-centric AI-powered data analysis tools, as well as guide future research on apprentices to research assistants, preliminary roadmaps for LLMs as assistants, and exploring autonomous agents through the lens of LLMs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Map of Exploring Human Interaction patterns with LLM: Insights into Collaboration and Creativity
Jiayang Li, Jiale Li
0
0
The outstanding performance capabilities of large language model have driven the evolution of current AI system interaction patterns. This has led to considerable discussion within the Human-AI Interaction (HAII) community. Numerous studies explore this interaction from technical, design, and empirical perspectives. However, the majority of current literature reviews concentrate on interactions across the wider spectrum of AI, with limited attention given to the specific realm of interaction with LLM. We searched for articles on human interaction with LLM, selecting 110 relevant publications meeting consensus definition of Human-AI interaction. Subsequently, we developed a comprehensive Mapping Procedure, structured in five distinct stages, to systematically analyze and categorize the collected publications. Applying this methodical approach, we meticulously mapped the chosen studies, culminating in a detailed and insightful representation of the research landscape. Overall, our review presents an novel approach, introducing a distinctive mapping method, specifically tailored to evaluate human-LLM interaction patterns. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the current research in related fields, employing clustering techniques for categorization, which enabled us to clearly delineate the status and challenges prevalent in each identified area.
4/9/2024
🤿
Human-Centered LLM-Agent User Interface: A Position Paper
Daniel Chin, Yuxuan Wang, Gus Xia
0
0
Large Language Model (LLM) -in-the-loop applications have been shown to effectively interpret the human user's commands, make plans, and operate external tools/systems accordingly. Still, the operation scope of the LLM agent is limited to passively following the user, requiring the user to frame his/her needs with regard to the underlying tools/systems. We note that the potential of an LLM-Agent User Interface (LAUI) is much greater. A user mostly ignorant to the underlying tools/systems should be able to work with a LAUI to discover an emergent workflow. Contrary to the conventional way of designing an explorable GUI to teach the user a predefined set of ways to use the system, in the ideal LAUI, the LLM agent is initialized to be proficient with the system, proactively studies the user and his/her needs, and proposes new interaction schemes to the user. To illustrate LAUI, we present Flute X GPT, a concrete example using an LLM agent, a prompt manager, and a flute-tutoring multi-modal software-hardware system to facilitate the complex, real-time user experience of learning to play the flute.
5/24/2024
💬
Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to Support Collaborative Human-AI Online Risk Data Annotation
Jinkyung Park, Pamela Wisniewski, Vivek Singh
0
0
In this position paper, we discuss the potential for leveraging LLMs as interactive research tools to facilitate collaboration between human coders and AI to effectively annotate online risk data at scale. Collaborative human-AI labeling is a promising approach to annotating large-scale and complex data for various tasks. Yet, tools and methods to support effective human-AI collaboration for data annotation are under-studied. This gap is pertinent because co-labeling tasks need to support a two-way interactive discussion that can add nuance and context, particularly in the context of online risk, which is highly subjective and contextualized. Therefore, we provide some of the early benefits and challenges of using LLMs-based tools for risk annotation and suggest future directions for the HCI research community to leverage LLMs as research tools to facilitate human-AI collaboration in contextualized online data annotation. Our research interests align very well with the purposes of the LLMs as Research Tools workshop to identify ongoing applications and challenges of using LLMs to work with data in HCI research. We anticipate learning valuable insights from organizers and participants into how LLMs can help reshape the HCI community's methods for working with data.
4/12/2024
Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View
Jintian Zhang, Xin Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Ruibo Liu, Bryan Hooi, Shumin Deng
0
0
As Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly employed in intricate social environments, a pressing query emerges: Can these NLP systems mirror human-esque collaborative intelligence, in a multi-agent society consisting of multiple large language models (LLMs)? This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by melding practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique `societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific `trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct `thinking pattern' (debate or reflection). Through evaluating these multi-agent societies on three benchmark datasets, we discern that certain collaborative strategies not only outshine previous top-tier approaches, but also optimize efficiency (using fewer API tokens). Moreover, our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring foundational social psychology theories. In conclusion, we integrate insights from social psychology to contextualize the collaboration of LLM agents, inspiring further investigations into the collaboration mechanism for LLMs. We commit to sharing our code and datasetsfootnote{url{https://github.com/zjunlp/MachineSoM}.}, hoping to catalyze further research in this promising avenue.
5/28/2024