Investigating learning-independent abstract reasoning in artificial neural networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) can perform abstract reasoning without specific training.
- Abstract reasoning is the ability to identify patterns and relationships in information, independent of specific content.
- The researchers tested whether ANNs can solve abstract reasoning tasks without being trained on those specific tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) can perform a type of high-level cognitive ability called abstract reasoning without being explicitly trained for it. Abstract reasoning involves identifying patterns and relationships in information, regardless of the specific content.
The researchers wanted to understand if ANNs could solve abstract reasoning problems, even if they hadn't been trained on those exact tasks before. This would suggest the networks have a more general, flexible intelligence, rather than being limited to narrow, trained capabilities.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a benchmark test called the Raven's Progressive Matrices to assess abstract reasoning in ANNs. This test presents a series of abstract patterns, and asks the model to identify the missing piece that completes the pattern.
The researchers trained various ANN architectures, including transformers and graph neural networks, on a diverse set of tasks. They then tested the trained models on the Raven's Progressive Matrices without any additional training.
The results showed that some ANN architectures, like transformers, were able to solve the abstract reasoning problems to a certain degree, even without being trained on that specific task. This suggests these models have developed inductive reasoning capabilities that allow them to apply their knowledge flexibly to new abstract problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the abstract reasoning performance of the ANNs, while impressive, is still limited compared to human-level capabilities. The researchers note that further work is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms that allow ANNs to exhibit this type of learning-independent abstract reasoning.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or limitations in the Raven's Progressive Matrices test itself, which could influence the results. There may be other types of abstract reasoning tasks that the ANNs may struggle with, even if they perform well on this particular benchmark.
Conclusion
This research provides evidence that some ANN architectures can exhibit a degree of learning-independent abstract reasoning, suggesting they have developed more flexible and generalizable cognitive abilities. However, there is still much work to be done to fully understand the extent and limits of this capability in artificial systems, and how it compares to human abstract reasoning. Continued exploration in this area could yield valuable insights into the nature of intelligence and the potential of AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Investigating learning-independent abstract reasoning in artificial neural networks
Tomer Barak, Yonatan Loewenstein
Humans are capable of solving complex abstract reasoning tests. Whether this ability reflects a learning-independent inference mechanism applicable to any novel unlearned problem or whether it is a manifestation of extensive training throughout life is an open question. Addressing this question in humans is challenging because it is impossible to control their prior training. However, assuming a similarity between the cognitive processing of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and humans, the extent to which training is required for ANNs' abstract reasoning is informative about this question in humans. Previous studies demonstrated that ANNs can solve abstract reasoning tests. However, this success required extensive training. In this study, we examined the learning-independent abstract reasoning of ANNs. Specifically, we evaluated their performance without any pretraining, with the ANNs' weights being randomly-initialized, and only change in the process of problem solving. We found that naive ANN models can solve non-trivial visual reasoning tests, similar to those used to evaluate human learning-independent reasoning. We further studied the mechanisms that support this ability. Our results suggest the possibility of learning-independent abstract reasoning that does not require extensive training.
Read more7/26/2024
🤖
0
AI without networks
Partha P Mitra, Cl'ement Sire
Contemporary Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands on two legs: large training data corpora and many-parameter artificial neural networks (ANNs). The data corpora are needed to represent the complexity and heterogeneity of the world. The role of the networks is less transparent due to the obscure dependence of the network parameters and outputs on the training data and inputs. This raises problems, ranging from technical-scientific to legal-ethical. We hypothesize that a transparent approach to machine learning is possible without using networks at all. By generalizing a parameter-free, statistically consistent data interpolation method, which we analyze theoretically in detail, we develop a network-free framework for AI incorporating generative modeling. We demonstrate this framework with examples from three different disciplines - ethology, control theory, and mathematics. Our generative Hilbert framework applied to the trajectories of small groups of swimming fish outperformed state-of-the-art traditional mathematical behavioral models and current ANN-based models. We demonstrate pure data interpolation based control by stabilizing an inverted pendulum and a driven logistic map around unstable fixed points. Finally, we present a mathematical application by predicting zeros of the Riemann Zeta function, achieving comparable performance as a transformer network. We do not suggest that the proposed framework will always outperform networks as over-parameterized networks can interpolate. However, our framework is theoretically sound, transparent, deterministic, and parameter free: remarkably, it does not require any compute-expensive training, does not involve optimization, has no model selection, and is easily reproduced and ported. We also propose an easily computed method of credit assignment based on this framework, to help address ethical-legal challenges raised by generative AI.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Can language models learn analogical reasoning? Investigating training objectives and comparisons to human performance
Molly R. Petersen, Lonneke van der Plas
While analogies are a common way to evaluate word embeddings in NLP, it is also of interest to investigate whether or not analogical reasoning is a task in itself that can be learned. In this paper, we test several ways to learn basic analogical reasoning, specifically focusing on analogies that are more typical of what is used to evaluate analogical reasoning in humans than those in commonly used NLP benchmarks. Our experiments find that models are able to learn analogical reasoning, even with a small amount of data. We additionally compare our models to a dataset with a human baseline, and find that after training, models approach human performance.
Read more5/6/2024
💬
0
Hypothesis Search: Inductive Reasoning with Language Models
Ruocheng Wang, Eric Zelikman, Gabriel Poesia, Yewen Pu, Nick Haber, Noah D. Goodman
Inductive reasoning is a core problem-solving capacity: humans can identify underlying principles from a few examples, which robustly generalize to novel scenarios. Recent work evaluates large language models (LLMs) on inductive reasoning tasks by directly prompting them yielding in context learning. This works well for straightforward inductive tasks but performs poorly on complex tasks such as the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC). In this work, we propose to improve the inductive reasoning ability of LLMs by generating explicit hypotheses at multiple levels of abstraction: we prompt the LLM to propose multiple abstract hypotheses about the problem, in natural language, then implement the natural language hypotheses as concrete Python programs. These programs can be verified by running on observed examples and generalized to novel inputs. To reduce the hypothesis search space, we explore steps to filter the set of hypotheses to implement: we either ask the LLM to summarize them into a smaller set of hypotheses or ask human annotators to select a subset. We verify our pipeline's effectiveness on the ARC visual inductive reasoning benchmark, its variant 1D-ARC, string transformation dataset SyGuS, and list transformation dataset List Functions. On a random 100-problem subset of ARC, our automated pipeline using LLM summaries achieves 30% accuracy, outperforming the direct prompting baseline (accuracy of 17%). With the minimal human input of selecting from LLM-generated candidates, performance is boosted to 33%. Our ablations show that both abstract hypothesis generation and concrete program representations benefit LLMs on inductive reasoning tasks.
Read more6/3/2024