Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates whether child-directed speech is effective training data for language models
- Compares language models trained on child-directed speech vs. adult-directed speech
- Evaluates model performance on various language tasks
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines whether language models trained on child-directed speech, which is the simplified and exaggerated way adults often speak to young children, are more effective than models trained on regular adult speech. The researchers want to see if the unique characteristics of child-directed speech, like simpler vocabulary and sentence structure, can help language models learn and perform better on different language tasks.
They trained two language models - one on child-directed speech data and one on typical adult-directed speech data. Then they tested how well each model did on a variety of language tests, like understanding natural language, generating coherent text, and answering questions. The goal was to determine if the child-directed speech model had an advantage over the adult-directed speech model on these language tasks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers trained two language models - one on a corpus of child-directed speech and one on a corpus of adult-directed speech. They used the same model architecture and training procedure for both, just varying the input data.
To evaluate the models, they tested their performance on a suite of language understanding and generation tasks, including natural language inference, language modeling, question answering, and text generation. The goal was to see if the child-directed speech model would outperform the adult-directed speech model, indicating that the unique properties of child-directed language are beneficial for training language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a systematic investigation into the effectiveness of child-directed speech as training data for language models. However, it acknowledges several caveats and limitations to the research. For instance, the child-directed speech corpus used may not fully capture the nuances and variations of how adults actually speak to children in real-world settings.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential long-term effects of training on child-directed speech, such as whether it could lead to language models that communicate in an overly simplistic way. There may also be concerns about the ethical implications of developing models that are optimized for interacting with children.
Overall, the research offers valuable insights, but further studies are needed to fully understand the tradeoffs and implications of using child-directed speech as training data for language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comparative analysis of language models trained on child-directed speech versus adult-directed speech. The findings suggest that while the child-directed speech model may have some advantages on certain language tasks, the differences are not as pronounced as one might expect. This indicates that the unique properties of child-directed language may not be as beneficial for training language models as previously thought.
The research highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the suitability of different data sources for training language AI systems. As these models become more pervasive, it is crucial to consider the ethical and societal implications of how they are developed and deployed, particularly when it comes to interactions with vulnerable populations like children.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?
Steven Y. Feng, Noah D. Goodman, Michael C. Frank
While high-performing language models are typically trained on hundreds of billions of words, human children become fluent language users with a much smaller amount of data. What are the features of the data they receive, and how do these features support language modeling objectives? To investigate this question, we train GPT-2 models on 29M words of English-language child-directed speech and a new matched, synthetic dataset (TinyDialogues), comparing to a heterogeneous blend of datasets from the BabyLM challenge. We evaluate both the syntactic and semantic knowledge of these models using developmentally-inspired evaluations. Through pretraining experiments, we test whether the global developmental ordering or the local discourse ordering of children's training data support high performance relative to other datasets. The local properties of the data affect model results, but somewhat surprisingly, global properties do not. Further, child language input is not uniquely valuable for training language models. These findings support the hypothesis that, rather than proceeding from better data, children's learning is instead substantially more efficient than current language modeling techniques.
Read more8/9/2024
0
A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic input
Yulu Qin, Wentao Wang, Brenden M. Lake
Language models (LMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in generating linguistically coherent text, sparking discussions about their relevance to understanding human language learnability. However, a significant gap exists between the training data for these models and the linguistic input a child receives. LMs are typically trained on data that is orders of magnitude larger and fundamentally different from child-directed speech (Warstadt and Bowman, 2022; Warstadt et al., 2023; Frank, 2023a). Addressing this discrepancy, our research focuses on training LMs on subsets of a single child's linguistic input. Previously, Wang, Vong, Kim, and Lake (2023) found that LMs trained in this setting can form syntactic and semantic word clusters and develop sensitivity to certain linguistic phenomena, but they only considered LSTMs and simpler neural networks trained from just one single-child dataset. Here, to examine the robustness of learnability from single-child input, we systematically train six different model architectures on five datasets (3 single-child and 2 baselines). We find that the models trained on single-child datasets showed consistent results that matched with previous work, underscoring the robustness of forming meaningful syntactic and semantic representations from a subset of a child's linguistic input.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Improving child speech recognition with augmented child-like speech
Yuanyuan Zhang, Zhengjun Yue, Tanvina Patel, Odette Scharenborg
State-of-the-art ASRs show suboptimal performance for child speech. The scarcity of child speech limits the development of child speech recognition (CSR). Therefore, we studied child-to-child voice conversion (VC) from existing child speakers in the dataset and additional (new) child speakers via monolingual and cross-lingual (Dutch-to-German) VC, respectively. The results showed that cross-lingual child-to-child VC significantly improved child ASR performance. Experiments on the impact of the quantity of child-to-child cross-lingual VC-generated data on fine-tuning (FT) ASR models gave the best results with two-fold augmentation for our FT-Conformer model and FT-Whisper model which reduced WERs with ~3% absolute compared to the baseline, and with six-fold augmentation for the model trained from scratch, which improved by an absolute 3.6% WER. Moreover, using a small amount of high-quality VC-generated data achieved similar results to those of our best-FT models.
Read more6/18/2024
💬
0
Babysit A Language Model From Scratch: Interactive Language Learning by Trials and Demonstrations
Ziqiao Ma, Zekun Wang, Joyce Chai
Humans are efficient language learners and inherently social creatures. Our language development is largely shaped by our social interactions, for example, the demonstration and feedback from caregivers. Contrary to human language learning, recent advancements in large language models have primarily adopted a non-interactive training paradigm, and refined pre-trained models through feedback afterward. In this work, we aim to examine how corrective feedback from interactions influences neural language acquisition from the ground up through systematically controlled experiments, assessing whether it contributes to learning efficiency in language models. We introduce a trial-and-demonstration (TnD) learning framework that incorporates three components: student trials, teacher demonstrations, and a reward conditioned on language competence at various developmental stages. Our experiments reveal that the TnD approach accelerates word acquisition for student models of equal and smaller numbers of parameters, and we highlight the significance of both trials and demonstrations. We further show that the teacher's choices of words influence students' word-specific learning efficiency, and a practice-makes-perfect effect is evident by a strong correlation between the frequency of words in trials and their respective learning curves. Our findings suggest that interactive language learning, with teacher demonstrations and student trials, can facilitate efficient word learning in language models.
Read more5/24/2024