Babysit A Language Model From Scratch: Interactive Language Learning by Trials and Demonstrations

Read original: arXiv:2405.13828 - Published 5/24/2024 by Ziqiao Ma, Zekun Wang, Joyce Chai
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Humans are efficient language learners, with language development shaped by social interactions and feedback from caregivers.
  • Recent advancements in large language models have primarily used non-interactive training paradigms, refining pre-trained models through feedback afterward.
  • This work aims to examine how corrective feedback from interactions influences neural language acquisition through systematically controlled experiments.

Plain English Explanation

Humans are naturally good at learning languages, and our language skills are largely developed through social interactions and feedback from the people around us, like our parents or caregivers. However, recent advancements in large language models have focused more on training models in a non-interactive way, where the model is trained on a lot of text data and then fine-tuned using feedback later on.

In this paper, the researchers wanted to explore how providing feedback and interaction during the learning process could affect how well language models acquire new words and language skills. They designed a trial-and-demonstration (TnD) learning framework that includes three key components:

  1. Student trials: The language model tries to use new words or language skills.
  2. Teacher demonstrations: The "teacher" provides feedback and examples to the model.
  3. Reward based on language competence: The model is rewarded for improving its language skills over time.

The researchers found that this interactive TnD approach helped language models learn words more efficiently, even when the models had fewer parameters (i.e., were smaller) than models trained in a non-interactive way. They also discovered that the specific words chosen by the "teacher" influenced how quickly the model learned those words, and that the more a word was practiced, the better the model got at using it.

Overall, the results suggest that incorporating interactive learning, with both student practice and teacher feedback, can help language models become more efficient at acquiring new language skills.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed a trial-and-demonstration (TnD) learning framework to systematically investigate how corrective feedback from interactions influences neural language acquisition. The TnD framework has three key components:

  1. Student trials: The student model attempts to use new words or language skills.
  2. Teacher demonstrations: The "teacher" provides feedback and examples to the student model.
  3. Reward conditioned on language competence: The student model is rewarded based on its improvement in language competence over time.

The researchers conducted experiments to assess whether this interactive TnD approach contributes to learning efficiency in language models, compared to non-interactive training. They found that the TnD approach accelerated word acquisition for student models of equal and smaller numbers of parameters than models trained in a non-interactive way.

The experiments also revealed that the teacher's choice of words influenced the students' word-specific learning efficiency, and that a "practice-makes-perfect" effect was observed, with a strong correlation between the frequency of words in trials and their respective learning curves.

These findings suggest that interactive language learning, with teacher demonstrations and student trials, can facilitate efficient word learning in language models, in contrast to the primarily non-interactive training paradigms used in recent advancements of large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling case for the benefits of interactive language learning for neural language models, but it also acknowledges several caveats and areas for further research.

One potential limitation is the use of simulated "teacher" demonstrations, rather than real human interactions. While this allows for more control and systematic experimentation, it may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world social language learning. Further research could explore how to integrate this interactive learning framework with more naturalistic human-in-the-loop interactions.

Additionally, the experiments in this paper focused primarily on word acquisition, and it would be valuable to investigate how the TnD approach affects higher-level language understanding and generation capabilities. Exploring the scalability of this framework to more complex language tasks would also be an important next step.

Overall, this work makes a strong case for the importance of incorporating interactive learning principles into the development of advanced language models, and it encourages further research into the learnability of language from a single child's perspective. By balancing systematic experimentation with real-world relevance, this type of research can help push the field of language modeling towards more human-like learning and communication abilities.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel trial-and-demonstration (TnD) learning framework that incorporates interactive feedback and demonstrates its benefits for efficient word learning in neural language models. The results suggest that interactive language learning, with teacher demonstrations and student trials, can accelerate the acquisition of new words and language skills, compared to non-interactive training approaches.

The findings have important implications for the development of more advanced and human-like language models, which could lead to significant advancements in areas such as natural language processing, conversational AI, and educational technology. By embracing the principles of social interaction and feedback that are central to human language development, the field of language modeling may be able to achieve new levels of efficiency and sophistication.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Babysit A Language Model From Scratch: Interactive Language Learning by Trials and Demonstrations

Ziqiao Ma, Zekun Wang, Joyce Chai

Humans are efficient language learners and inherently social creatures. Our language development is largely shaped by our social interactions, for example, the demonstration and feedback from caregivers. Contrary to human language learning, recent advancements in large language models have primarily adopted a non-interactive training paradigm, and refined pre-trained models through feedback afterward. In this work, we aim to examine how corrective feedback from interactions influences neural language acquisition from the ground up through systematically controlled experiments, assessing whether it contributes to learning efficiency in language models. We introduce a trial-and-demonstration (TnD) learning framework that incorporates three components: student trials, teacher demonstrations, and a reward conditioned on language competence at various developmental stages. Our experiments reveal that the TnD approach accelerates word acquisition for student models of equal and smaller numbers of parameters, and we highlight the significance of both trials and demonstrations. We further show that the teacher's choices of words influence students' word-specific learning efficiency, and a practice-makes-perfect effect is evident by a strong correlation between the frequency of words in trials and their respective learning curves. Our findings suggest that interactive language learning, with teacher demonstrations and student trials, can facilitate efficient word learning in language models.

Read more

5/24/2024

The Impact of Demonstrations on Multilingual In-Context Learning: A Multidimensional Analysis
Total Score

0

The Impact of Demonstrations on Multilingual In-Context Learning: A Multidimensional Analysis

Miaoran Zhang, Vagrant Gautam, Mingyang Wang, Jesujoba O. Alabi, Xiaoyu Shen, Dietrich Klakow, Marius Mosbach

In-context learning is a popular inference strategy where large language models solve a task using only a few labeled demonstrations without needing any parameter updates. Although there have been extensive studies on English in-context learning, multilingual in-context learning remains under-explored, and we lack an in-depth understanding of the role of demonstrations in this context. To address this gap, we conduct a multidimensional analysis of multilingual in-context learning, experimenting with 5 models from different model families, 9 datasets covering classification and generation tasks, and 56 typologically diverse languages. Our results reveal that the effectiveness of demonstrations varies significantly across models, tasks, and languages. We also find that strong instruction-following models including Llama 2-Chat, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 are largely insensitive to the quality of demonstrations. Instead, a carefully crafted template often eliminates the benefits of demonstrations for some tasks and languages altogether. These findings show that the importance of demonstrations might be overestimated. Our work highlights the need for granular evaluation across multiple axes towards a better understanding of in-context learning.

Read more

6/10/2024

Show, Don't Tell: Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback
Total Score

0

Show, Don't Tell: Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback

Omar Shaikh, Michelle Lam, Joey Hejna, Yijia Shao, Michael Bernstein, Diyi Yang

Language models are aligned to emulate the collective voice of many, resulting in outputs that align with no one in particular. Steering LLMs away from generic output is possible through supervised finetuning or RLHF, but requires prohibitively large datasets for new ad-hoc tasks. We argue that it is instead possible to align an LLM to a specific setting by leveraging a very small number ($<10$) of demonstrations as feedback. Our method, Demonstration ITerated Task Optimization (DITTO), directly aligns language model outputs to a user's demonstrated behaviors. Derived using ideas from online imitation learning, DITTO cheaply generates online comparison data by treating users' demonstrations as preferred over output from the LLM and its intermediate checkpoints. We evaluate DITTO's ability to learn fine-grained style and task alignment across domains such as news articles, emails, and blog posts. Additionally, we conduct a user study soliciting a range of demonstrations from participants ($N=16$). Across our benchmarks and user study, we find that win-rates for DITTO outperform few-shot prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and other self-play methods by an average of 19% points. By using demonstrations as feedback directly, DITTO offers a novel method for effective customization of LLMs.

Read more

6/4/2024

Large Language Models Are Self-Taught Reasoners: Enhancing LLM Applications via Tailored Problem-Solving Demonstrations
Total Score

0

Large Language Models Are Self-Taught Reasoners: Enhancing LLM Applications via Tailored Problem-Solving Demonstrations

Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Taeyoon Kwon, Jinyoung Yeo

Guiding large language models with a selected set of human-authored demonstrations is a common practice for improving LLM applications. However, human effort can be costly, especially in specialized domains (e.g., clinical diagnosis), and does not guarantee optimal performance due to the potential discrepancy of target skills between selected demonstrations and real test instances. Motivated by these, this paper explores the automatic creation of customized demonstrations, whose target skills align with the given target instance. We present SELF-TAUGHT, a problem-solving framework, which facilitates demonstrations that are tailored to the target problem and filtered for better quality (i.e., correctness) in a zero-shot manner. In 15 tasks of multiple-choice questions of diverse domains and the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with real-world patients, SELF-TAUGHT achieves superior performance to strong baselines (e.g., Few-shot CoT, Plan-and-Solve, Auto-CoT). We conduct comprehensive analyses on SELF-TAUGHT, including its generalizability to existing prompting methods and different LLMs, the quality of its intermediate generation, and more.

Read more

8/23/2024