A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic input
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper systematically investigates how well language models can learn from limited linguistic input, similar to how young children learn language.
- The researchers explored the learnability of various linguistic structures from single-child language acquisition datasets.
- They evaluated the performance of language models on tasks like word segmentation, part-of-speech tagging, and grammar learning.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how well language models, which are artificial intelligence systems trained on large amounts of text data, can learn language in a way similar to how young children learn their native language. Children typically have access to limited linguistic input from their parents and caregivers, yet are able to pick up on complex language patterns and structures.
The researchers wanted to see if language models could also learn effectively from this kind of constrained, single-child language data, rather than the massive datasets commonly used to train them. They tested the models' performance on tasks like identifying word boundaries, determining the parts of speech of words, and learning grammatical structures. This provides insights into how children are able to acquire language so quickly and efficiently from relatively little input.
By understanding the capabilities and limitations of language models in this type of learning scenario, the research can help inform theories of child language acquisition and potentially lead to more human-like language understanding in artificial intelligence systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic investigation into the learnability of various linguistic structures from single-child language acquisition datasets. The researchers evaluated the performance of state-of-the-art neural language models on tasks such as word segmentation, part-of-speech tagging, and grammar learning.
The experiments used child-directed speech datasets from the CHILDES database, which contains transcripts of interactions between children and their caregivers. The researchers compared the models' performance on these tasks to their performance on standard adult-written text corpora.
The results suggest that while language models can learn some linguistic structures from limited child-directed input, their performance lags behind when compared to learning from more abundant adult-written text. The paper discusses potential reasons for this, such as the simplified nature of child-directed speech and the difficulty of capturing complex grammatical patterns from sparse data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of the challenges involved in learning language from the type of input available to young children. The authors acknowledge the limitations of their study, noting that the datasets used may not fully capture the richness of real-world child-caregiver interactions.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential implications of these findings for theories of child language acquisition. While the results suggest that language models struggle to match human-level performance in this domain, further research would be needed to determine the exact factors that contribute to children's remarkable language learning abilities.
It would also be interesting to see if incorporating additional cognitive biases or constraints into the language models could improve their learning from limited data, perhaps drawing inspiration from our understanding of human language acquisition.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic investigation into the ability of language models to learn from the type of linguistic input available to young children. The findings suggest that while language models can extract some linguistic structures from child-directed speech, they fall short of human-level performance on tasks like word segmentation and grammar learning.
These results provide valuable insights into the challenges of mimicking child language acquisition in artificial intelligence systems. The research highlights the need for further advancements in machine learning techniques to better capture the nuances of human language learning, which could lead to more human-like language understanding in AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic input
Yulu Qin, Wentao Wang, Brenden M. Lake
Language models (LMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in generating linguistically coherent text, sparking discussions about their relevance to understanding human language learnability. However, a significant gap exists between the training data for these models and the linguistic input a child receives. LMs are typically trained on data that is orders of magnitude larger and fundamentally different from child-directed speech (Warstadt and Bowman, 2022; Warstadt et al., 2023; Frank, 2023a). Addressing this discrepancy, our research focuses on training LMs on subsets of a single child's linguistic input. Previously, Wang, Vong, Kim, and Lake (2023) found that LMs trained in this setting can form syntactic and semantic word clusters and develop sensitivity to certain linguistic phenomena, but they only considered LSTMs and simpler neural networks trained from just one single-child dataset. Here, to examine the robustness of learnability from single-child input, we systematically train six different model architectures on five datasets (3 single-child and 2 baselines). We find that the models trained on single-child datasets showed consistent results that matched with previous work, underscoring the robustness of forming meaningful syntactic and semantic representations from a subset of a child's linguistic input.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?
Steven Y. Feng, Noah D. Goodman, Michael C. Frank
While high-performing language models are typically trained on hundreds of billions of words, human children become fluent language users with a much smaller amount of data. What are the features of the data they receive, and how do these features support language modeling objectives? To investigate this question, we train GPT-2 models on 29M words of English-language child-directed speech and a new matched, synthetic dataset (TinyDialogues), comparing to a heterogeneous blend of datasets from the BabyLM challenge. We evaluate both the syntactic and semantic knowledge of these models using developmentally-inspired evaluations. Through pretraining experiments, we test whether the global developmental ordering or the local discourse ordering of children's training data support high performance relative to other datasets. The local properties of the data affect model results, but somewhat surprisingly, global properties do not. Further, child language input is not uniquely valuable for training language models. These findings support the hypothesis that, rather than proceeding from better data, children's learning is instead substantially more efficient than current language modeling techniques.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Language Models as Models of Language
Raphael Milli`ere
This chapter critically examines the potential contributions of modern language models to theoretical linguistics. Despite their focus on engineering goals, these models' ability to acquire sophisticated linguistic knowledge from mere exposure to data warrants a careful reassessment of their relevance to linguistic theory. I review a growing body of empirical evidence suggesting that language models can learn hierarchical syntactic structure and exhibit sensitivity to various linguistic phenomena, even when trained on developmentally plausible amounts of data. While the competence/performance distinction has been invoked to dismiss the relevance of such models to linguistic theory, I argue that this assessment may be premature. By carefully controlling learning conditions and making use of causal intervention methods, experiments with language models can potentially constrain hypotheses about language acquisition and competence. I conclude that closer collaboration between theoretical linguists and computational researchers could yield valuable insights, particularly in advancing debates about linguistic nativism.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?
Zhenmei Shi, Junyi Wei, Zhuoyan Xu, Yingyu Liang
Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a powerful tool for AI, with the key ability of in-context learning (ICL), where they can perform well on unseen tasks based on a brief series of task examples without necessitating any adjustments to the model parameters. One recent interesting mysterious observation is that models of different scales may have different ICL behaviors: larger models tend to be more sensitive to noise in the test context. This work studies this observation theoretically aiming to improve the understanding of LLM and ICL. We analyze two stylized settings: (1) linear regression with one-layer single-head linear transformers and (2) parity classification with two-layer multiple attention heads transformers (non-linear data and non-linear model). In both settings, we give closed-form optimal solutions and find that smaller models emphasize important hidden features while larger ones cover more hidden features; thus, smaller models are more robust to noise while larger ones are more easily distracted, leading to different ICL behaviors. This sheds light on where transformers pay attention to and how that affects ICL. Preliminary experimental results on large base and chat models provide positive support for our analysis.
Read more5/31/2024