Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic Interaction
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the possibility and impossibility of learning from strategic interactions
- Focuses on studying the dynamics of learning in strategic environments
- Investigates the conditions under which learners can successfully extract information from strategic interactions
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the challenges and limitations of learning from strategic interactions. In strategic environments, individuals or agents may have conflicting goals and incentives, which can make it difficult for them to learn from each other's behaviors and decisions.
The researchers investigate the conditions under which learners can successfully extract useful information from strategic interactions. They consider scenarios where agents are trying to optimize their own outcomes, which may involve hiding or misrepresenting information to gain an advantage.
The paper examines the tradeoffs between information acquisition and strategic behavior and explores the circumstances in which learners can overcome these challenges to learn effectively from strategic interactions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the dynamics of learning in strategic environments. The researchers model a setting where multiple agents are engaged in a strategic interaction, each trying to optimize their own payoffs. They investigate the conditions under which a
The key elements of the paper include:
-
Game-Theoretic Framework: The researchers use a game-theoretic approach to model the strategic interactions between the agents. They consider different types of games, such as zero-sum games and general-sum games, and analyze the implications for learning.
-
Learning Objectives: The learner agent's goal is to learn about the environment and the other agents' strategies in order to optimize its own payoffs. The researchers explore different learning objectives, such as identifying the Nash equilibrium of the game or estimating the other agents' utility functions.
-
Strategic Behavior: The paper examines how the other agents' strategic behavior, such as hiding or misrepresenting information, can impact the learner's ability to extract useful information from the interactions.
-
Theoretical Limits: The researchers establish theoretical limits on the learner's ability to learn in certain strategic environments, demonstrating the fundamental tradeoffs between information acquisition and strategic behavior.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the challenges and limitations of learning in strategic environments. The researchers identify important factors, such as the game structure and the agents' incentives, that can significantly impact the learner's ability to extract useful information from the interactions.
One potential limitation of the research is that it relies on a relatively simplified theoretical framework, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world strategic interactions. Additionally, the paper does not provide specific recommendations or guidelines for how learners can overcome the identified challenges in practice.
Further research may be needed to explore more realistic and practical scenarios, as well as to develop more nuanced approaches to learning in strategic environments. Nevertheless, the insights presented in this paper contribute to our understanding of the fundamental tradeoffs involved in learning from strategic interactions.
Conclusion
This paper offers a thought-provoking exploration of the (im)possibility of learning from strategic interactions. By identifying the theoretical limits and tradeoffs inherent in such settings, the researchers highlight the challenges faced by learners trying to extract useful information from strategic environments.
The findings have important implications for a wide range of applications, from multi-agent systems to game-theoretic decision-making. The paper encourages us to think critically about the conditions under which learning can be successful in strategic contexts and to explore more nuanced approaches to navigating these complex dynamics.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic Interaction
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan, Nika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe Yang
When learning in strategic environments, a key question is whether agents can overcome uncertainty about their preferences to achieve outcomes they could have achieved absent any uncertainty. Can they do this solely through interactions with each other? We focus this question on the ability of agents to attain the value of their Stackelberg optimal strategy and study the impact of information asymmetry. We study repeated interactions in fully strategic environments where players' actions are decided based on learning algorithms that take into account their observed histories and knowledge of the game. We study the pure Nash equilibria (PNE) of a meta-game where players choose these algorithms as their actions. We demonstrate that if one player has perfect knowledge about the game, then any initial informational gap persists. That is, while there is always a PNE in which the informed agent achieves her Stackelberg value, there is a game where no PNE of the meta-game allows the partially informed player to achieve her Stackelberg value. On the other hand, if both players start with some uncertainty about the game, the quality of information alone does not determine which agent can achieve her Stackelberg value. In this case, the concept of information asymmetry becomes nuanced and depends on the game's structure. Overall, our findings suggest that repeated strategic interactions alone cannot facilitate learning effectively enough to earn an uninformed player her Stackelberg value.
Read more8/16/2024
📉
0
Decentralized Online Learning in General-Sum Stackelberg Games
Yaolong Yu, Haipeng Chen
We study an online learning problem in general-sum Stackelberg games, where players act in a decentralized and strategic manner. We study two settings depending on the type of information for the follower: (1) the limited information setting where the follower only observes its own reward, and (2) the side information setting where the follower has extra side information about the leader's reward. We show that for the follower, myopically best responding to the leader's action is the best strategy for the limited information setting, but not necessarily so for the side information setting -- the follower can manipulate the leader's reward signals with strategic actions, and hence induce the leader's strategy to converge to an equilibrium that is better off for itself. Based on these insights, we study decentralized online learning for both players in the two settings. Our main contribution is to derive last-iterate convergence and sample complexity results in both settings. Notably, we design a new manipulation strategy for the follower in the latter setting, and show that it has an intrinsic advantage against the best response strategy. Our theories are also supported by empirical results.
Read more5/7/2024
📊
0
Opponent Modeling in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games
Sam Ganzfried, Kevin A. Wang, Max Chiswick
In many real-world settings agents engage in strategic interactions with multiple opposing agents who can employ a wide variety of strategies. The standard approach for designing agents for such settings is to compute or approximate a relevant game-theoretic solution concept such as Nash equilibrium and then follow the prescribed strategy. However, such a strategy ignores any observations of opponents' play, which may indicate shortcomings that can be exploited. We present an approach for opponent modeling in multiplayer imperfect-information games where we collect observations of opponents' play through repeated interactions. We run experiments against a wide variety of real opponents and exact Nash equilibrium strategies in three-player Kuhn poker and show that our algorithm significantly outperforms all of the agents, including the exact Nash equilibrium strategies.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Strategic Negotiations in Endogenous Network Formation
Akhil Jalan, Deepayan Chakrabarti
In network formation games, agents form edges with each other to maximize their utility. Each agent's utility depends on its private beliefs and its edges in the network. Strategic agents can misrepresent their beliefs to get a better resulting network. Most prior works in this area consider honest agents or a single strategic agent. Instead, we propose a model where any subset of agents can be strategic. We provide an efficient algorithm for finding the set of Nash equilibria, if any exist, and certify their nonexistence otherwise. We also show that when several strategic agents are present, their utilities can increase or decrease compared to when they are all honest. Small changes in the inter-agent correlations can cause such shifts. In contrast, the simpler one-strategic-agent setting explored in the literature lacks such complex patterns. Finally, we develop an algorithm by which new agents can learn the information needed for strategic behavior. Our algorithm works even when the (unknown) strategic agents deviate from the Nash-optimal strategies. We verify these results on both simulated networks and a real-world dataset on international trade.
Read more9/4/2024