Strategic Negotiations in Endogenous Network Formation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines strategic contract negotiations in financial networks
- Proposes a game-theoretical model to analyze the dynamics of these negotiations
- Explores how network structure and agent characteristics impact negotiation outcomes
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how parties negotiate contracts within a financial network. Financial networks are complex systems where different entities, like banks or investors, are interconnected through various financial relationships.
When these entities need to negotiate a new contract or update an existing one, the authors propose using a game-theoretical model to analyze the strategic dynamics at play. The model considers factors like the negotiating parties' bargaining power, the structure of the overall financial network, and the information available to each side.
By studying these strategic negotiations, the researchers aim to understand how the network structure and the characteristics of the individual agents impact the final contract terms and outcomes. This could provide insights to help parties negotiate more effectively and efficiently within these intricate financial landscapes.
Technical Explanation
The paper develops a game-theoretical framework to study strategic contract negotiations in financial networks. The authors model the negotiation process as a bargaining game between two connected agents, where each agent has private information about their own preferences and constraints.
The key elements of the model include:
- The financial network structure, which determines the set of potential negotiation partners for each agent
- The agents' characteristics, such as their bargaining power, risk preferences, and access to information
- The negotiation protocol, which specifies how offers, counteroffers, and agreements are made
The authors analyze the equilibrium outcomes of these negotiations, examining how factors like network centrality, information asymmetry, and complementarities between agents affect the final contract terms. They also explore how the negotiation dynamics can enhance cooperation or lead to unequal outcomes within the network.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical framework for understanding strategic contract negotiations in financial networks. By incorporating network structure and agent heterogeneity, the model captures important real-world complexities that are often absent from simpler bargaining models.
However, the analysis relies on several simplifying assumptions, such as the specific negotiation protocol and the availability of information to the agents. In practice, contract negotiations can involve more complex dynamics, such as multi-party interactions, incomplete information, or the possibility of renegotiation.
Additionally, the paper does not consider the potential for strategic manipulation or misaligned incentives within the network, which could lead to suboptimal or even harmful negotiation outcomes. Further research could explore these potential issues and their implications for financial stability and regulatory policies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a game-theoretical framework for analyzing strategic contract negotiations in financial networks. By considering the network structure and agent characteristics, the model provides insights into how these factors shape the dynamics and outcomes of these negotiations.
The findings have important implications for understanding the complex dynamics of financial systems and could inform the design of policies and mechanisms to promote more efficient and equitable contract negotiation practices. However, the simplifying assumptions and potential limitations of the model suggest that further empirical and theoretical research is needed to fully capture the nuances of real-world financial contract negotiations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Strategic Negotiations in Endogenous Network Formation
Akhil Jalan, Deepayan Chakrabarti
In network formation games, agents form edges with each other to maximize their utility. Each agent's utility depends on its private beliefs and its edges in the network. Strategic agents can misrepresent their beliefs to get a better resulting network. Most prior works in this area consider honest agents or a single strategic agent. Instead, we propose a model where any subset of agents can be strategic. We provide an efficient algorithm for finding the set of Nash equilibria, if any exist, and certify their nonexistence otherwise. We also show that when several strategic agents are present, their utilities can increase or decrease compared to when they are all honest. Small changes in the inter-agent correlations can cause such shifts. In contrast, the simpler one-strategic-agent setting explored in the literature lacks such complex patterns. Finally, we develop an algorithm by which new agents can learn the information needed for strategic behavior. Our algorithm works even when the (unknown) strategic agents deviate from the Nash-optimal strategies. We verify these results on both simulated networks and a real-world dataset on international trade.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Equilibria, Efficiency, and Inequality in Network Formation for Hiring and Opportunity
Cynthia Dwork, Chris Hays, Jon Kleinberg, Manish Raghavan
Professional networks -- the social networks among people in a given line of work -- can serve as a conduit for job prospects and other opportunities. Here we propose a model for the formation of such networks and the transfer of opportunities within them. In our theoretical model, individuals strategically connect with others to maximize the probability that they receive opportunities from them. We explore how professional networks balance connectivity, where connections facilitate opportunity transfers to those who did not get them from outside sources, and congestion, where some individuals receive too many opportunities from their connections and waste some of them. We show that strategic individuals are over-connected at equilibrium relative to a social optimum, leading to a price of anarchy for which we derive nearly tight asymptotic bounds. We also show that, at equilibrium, individuals form connections to those who provide similar benefit to them as they provide to others. Thus, our model provides a microfoundation in professional networking contexts for the fundamental sociological principle of homophily, that similarity breeds connection, which in our setting is realized as a form of status homophily based on alignment in individual benefit. We further explore how, even if individuals are a priori equally likely to receive opportunities from outside sources, equilibria can be unequal, and we provide nearly tight bounds on how unequal they can be. Finally, we explore the ability for online platforms to intervene to improve social welfare and show that natural heuristics may result in adverse effects at equilibrium. Our simple model allows for a surprisingly rich analysis of coordination problems in professional networks and suggests many directions for further exploration.
Read more6/28/2024
0
Indirect Dynamic Negotiation in the Nash Demand Game
Tatiana V. Guy, Jitka Homolov'a, Aleksej Gaj
The paper addresses a problem of sequential bilateral bargaining with incomplete information. We proposed a decision model that helps agents to successfully bargain by performing indirect negotiation and learning the opponent's model. Methodologically the paper casts heuristically-motivated bargaining of a self-interested independent player into a framework of Bayesian learning and Markov decision processes. The special form of the reward implicitly motivates the players to negotiate indirectly, via closed-loop interaction. We illustrate the approach by applying our model to the Nash demand game, which is an abstract model of bargaining. The results indicate that the established negotiation: i) leads to coordinating players' actions; ii) results in maximising success rate of the game and iii) brings more individual profit to the players.
Read more9/11/2024
📊
0
Opponent Modeling in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games
Sam Ganzfried, Kevin A. Wang, Max Chiswick
In many real-world settings agents engage in strategic interactions with multiple opposing agents who can employ a wide variety of strategies. The standard approach for designing agents for such settings is to compute or approximate a relevant game-theoretic solution concept such as Nash equilibrium and then follow the prescribed strategy. However, such a strategy ignores any observations of opponents' play, which may indicate shortcomings that can be exploited. We present an approach for opponent modeling in multiplayer imperfect-information games where we collect observations of opponents' play through repeated interactions. We run experiments against a wide variety of real opponents and exact Nash equilibrium strategies in three-player Kuhn poker and show that our algorithm significantly outperforms all of the agents, including the exact Nash equilibrium strategies.
Read more7/30/2024