Is text normalization relevant for classifying medieval charters?

Read original: arXiv:2408.16446 - Published 8/30/2024 by Florian Atzenhofer-Baumgartner, Tam'as Kov'acs
Total Score

0

⚙️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper examines the impact of text normalization on classifying medieval charters.
  • It explores whether normalizing historical text data can improve the performance of document classification models.
  • The research is focused on less-resourced languages and the digital humanities domain of medieval diplomatics.

Plain English Explanation

Text normalization is the process of converting historical or archaic text into a more modern, standardized form. This can involve tasks like expanding abbreviations, correcting spelling, and modernizing grammar.

The researchers in this paper wanted to see if applying text normalization to medieval charters could improve the accuracy of classifying them into different categories, like legal or administrative documents. Medieval charters are an important historical record, but they can be challenging to analyze due to their archaic language and writing conventions.

By transforming the text into a more modern form, the researchers hoped the classification models would be better able to identify patterns and extract relevant features from the documents. This could be especially helpful for under-resourced languages where training data is limited.

Technical Explanation

The paper reports on a set of experiments that evaluated the impact of text normalization on classifying medieval charters. The researchers used a dataset of over 3,000 charters written in Latin, Italian, and German, and applied various normalization techniques such as expanding abbreviations and modernizing spellings.

They then trained several machine learning models, including logistic regression and support vector machines, to classify the charters into different categories based on their content and diplomatic features. The models were evaluated both with and without the normalized text to assess the impact of the text preprocessing step.

The results showed that text normalization did not consistently improve classification performance across all languages and models. In some cases, it even degraded accuracy. The researchers hypothesize that this may be due to the loss of historical linguistic information that could be valuable for distinguishing between charter types.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a nuanced view on the role of text normalization in historical document classification. While the authors acknowledge that normalization can be helpful in some contexts, their empirical results suggest that it may not be universally beneficial, at least for the specific task of medieval charter classification.

One limitation of the study is that it focused on a relatively narrow domain of historical documents. It's possible that the impact of normalization could differ for other types of historical texts or genres. Additionally, the researchers note that the quality and consistency of the normalization process itself could be a factor in its effectiveness.

Further research may be needed to better understand the tradeoffs involved in historical text normalization, and to explore alternative approaches that can preserve relevant linguistic features while still improving model performance. Engaging with domain experts in medieval diplomatics could also provide additional insights.

Conclusion

This paper offers a cautionary tale about the application of text normalization to historical document classification tasks. While the intuition that modernizing archaic language could aid machine learning models seems reasonable, the actual results were more mixed.

The findings suggest that the benefits of normalization may depend on the specific characteristics of the historical texts and the classification task at hand. Researchers and practitioners working in the digital humanities and related fields should consider this nuance when deciding whether to incorporate text normalization into their workflows.

Overall, the paper contributes to our understanding of the challenges and tradeoffs involved in applying modern natural language processing techniques to historical textual data - an important area of study as digital humanities continues to evolve.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Total Score

0

Is text normalization relevant for classifying medieval charters?

Florian Atzenhofer-Baumgartner, Tam'as Kov'acs

This study examines the impact of historical text normalization on the classification of medieval charters, specifically focusing on document dating and locating. Using a data set of Middle High German charters from a digital archive, we evaluate various classifiers, including traditional and transformer-based models, with and without normalization. Our results indicate that the given normalization minimally improves locating tasks but reduces accuracy for dating, implying that original texts contain crucial features that normalization may obscure. We find that support vector machines and gradient boosting outperform other models, questioning the efficiency of transformers for this use case. Results suggest a selective approach to historical text normalization, emphasizing the significance of preserving some textual characteristics that are critical for classification tasks in document analysis.

Read more

8/30/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Historical German Text Normalization Using Type- and Token-Based Language Modeling

Anton Ehrmanntraut

Historic variations of spelling poses a challenge for full-text search or natural language processing on historical digitized texts. To minimize the gap between the historic orthography and contemporary spelling, usually an automatic orthographic normalization of the historical source material is pursued. This report proposes a normalization system for German literary texts from c. 1700-1900, trained on a parallel corpus. The proposed system makes use of a machine learning approach using Transformer language models, combining an encoder-decoder model to normalize individual word types, and a pre-trained causal language model to adjust these normalizations within their context. An extensive evaluation shows that the proposed system provides state-of-the-art accuracy, comparable with a much larger fully end-to-end sentence-based normalization system, fine-tuning a pre-trained Transformer large language model. However, the normalization of historical text remains a challenge due to difficulties for models to generalize, and the lack of extensive high-quality parallel data.

Read more

9/5/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Medical Concept Normalization in a Low-Resource Setting

Tim Patzelt

In the field of biomedical natural language processing, medical concept normalization is a crucial task for accurately mapping mentions of concepts to a large knowledge base. However, this task becomes even more challenging in low-resource settings, where limited data and resources are available. In this thesis, I explore the challenges of medical concept normalization in a low-resource setting. Specifically, I investigate the shortcomings of current medical concept normalization methods applied to German lay texts. Since there is no suitable dataset available, a dataset consisting of posts from a German medical online forum is annotated with concepts from the Unified Medical Language System. The experiments demonstrate that multilingual Transformer-based models are able to outperform string similarity methods. The use of contextual information to improve the normalization of lay mentions is also examined, but led to inferior results. Based on the results of the best performing model, I present a systematic error analysis and lay out potential improvements to mitigate frequent errors.

Read more

9/24/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Benchmarking Advanced Text Anonymisation Methods: A Comparative Study on Novel and Traditional Approaches

Dimitris Asimopoulos, Ilias Siniosoglou, Vasileios Argyriou, Thomai Karamitsou, Eleftherios Fountoukidis, Sotirios K. Goudos, Ioannis D. Moscholios, Konstantinos E. Psannis, Panagiotis Sarigiannidis

In the realm of data privacy, the ability to effectively anonymise text is paramount. With the proliferation of deep learning and, in particular, transformer architectures, there is a burgeoning interest in leveraging these advanced models for text anonymisation tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking study comparing the performance of transformer-based models and Large Language Models(LLM) against traditional architectures for text anonymisation. Utilising the CoNLL-2003 dataset, known for its robustness and diversity, we evaluate several models. Our results showcase the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, offering a clear perspective on the efficacy of modern versus traditional methods. Notably, while modern models exhibit advanced capabilities in capturing con textual nuances, certain traditional architectures still keep high performance. This work aims to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable model for their anonymisation needs, while also shedding light on potential paths for future advancements in the field.

Read more

4/24/2024