I've got the Answer! Interpretation of LLMs Hidden States in Question Answering

Overview

• This paper explores the interpretation of large language models (LLMs) in the context of knowledge-based question answering.
• The key hypothesis is that correct and incorrect model behavior can be distinguished at the level of hidden states.
• The study uses quantized models LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, Mistral-7B, Vicuna-7B and the MuSeRC question-answering dataset to test this hypothesis.
• The results support the proposed hypothesis, and the paper also identifies layers that have a negative effect on the model's behavior.
• The paper proposes training these weaker layers further to improve the quality of task solutions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how we can understand and explain the inner workings of large language models (LLMs) - the powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. As LLMs become more advanced, it's important to be able to interpret how they arrive at their answers, especially when they are used for important tasks like answering questions.

The researchers had a hunch that by looking at the different "layers" or components inside the LLM, they could tell the difference between when the model was giving a correct answer versus an incorrect one. To test this, they used several different LLM models and a dataset of questions that the models had to answer.

The results showed that the researchers were right - they could indeed distinguish correct and incorrect behavior by analyzing the model's hidden layers. This suggests that we may be able to "peek inside" these black box models and understand what's going on. As a next step, the researchers propose specifically training the weaker layers of the models to improve their overall performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the interpretability of large language models (LLMs) in the context of knowledge-based question answering. The central hypothesis is that correct and incorrect model behavior can be distinguished by analyzing the hidden states - the internal representations within the model.

To test this, the researchers used several quantized LLM models: LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, Mistral-7B, and Vicuna-7B. They evaluated the models' performance on the MuSeRC question-answering dataset. The analysis of the hidden states supported the proposed hypothesis, revealing that certain layers had a negative impact on the model's behavior.

As a potential application, the paper suggests training these weaker layers further to improve the overall quality of the model's task solutions. This could allow for better interpretability and explainability of LLMs, which is an increasingly important consideration as these models become more advanced and widespread.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents an interesting approach to understanding the inner workings of large language models. By focusing on the hidden states, the researchers were able to identify specific layers that negatively impacted the models' performance on the question-answering task.

However, it's important to note that this is a relatively narrow study, focused on a single task domain. It's unclear whether the same patterns would hold true for other types of tasks or datasets. Further research would be needed to assess the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, while the proposed approach of selectively training weaker layers shows promise, the paper does not provide a detailed implementation or evaluation of this technique. More work would be required to demonstrate the practical effectiveness of this method for improving LLM interpretability and performance.

Overall, the paper contributes a valuable perspective on the interpretability of LLMs, but additional research and validation would be needed to fully assess the broader implications and applicability of the findings.

Conclusion

This paper presents an investigation into the interpretability of large language models in the context of knowledge-based question answering. The key finding is that correct and incorrect model behavior can be distinguished by analyzing the hidden states or internal representations of the models.

The researchers suggest that this insight could be leveraged to improve LLM interpretability and performance, for example, by selectively training weaker model layers. As LLMs become more advanced and widely deployed, understanding their inner workings and developing techniques to make them more transparent and accountable will be crucial.

While the study is limited in scope, it represents an important step towards greater interpretability and explainability of these powerful AI systems, which is a critical need in the field of machine learning.