Investigating How Large Language Models Leverage Internal Knowledge to Perform Complex Reasoning
2406.19502
0
0
💬
Abstract
Despite significant advancements, there is a limited understanding of how large language models (LLMs) utilize knowledge for reasoning. To address this, we propose a method that deconstructs complex real-world questions into a graph, representing each question as a node with parent nodes of background knowledge needed to solve the question. We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. Based on a hierarchical graph, we quantify forward discrepancy, discrepancies in LLMs' performance on simpler sub-problems versus complex questions. We also measure backward discrepancy, where LLMs answer complex questions but struggle with simpler ones. Our analysis shows that smaller models have more discrepancies than larger models. Additionally, guiding models from simpler to complex questions through multi-turn interactions improves performance across model sizes, highlighting the importance of structured intermediate steps in knowledge reasoning. This work enhances our understanding of LLM reasoning and suggests ways to improve their problem-solving abilities.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) utilize knowledge for reasoning, a topic that is not well understood.
- The researchers propose a method that breaks down complex real-world questions into a graph structure, with each question represented as a node and the necessary background knowledge as parent nodes.
- They develop the DepthQA dataset to assess LLM performance on different levels of knowledge: recalling conceptual knowledge, applying procedural knowledge, and analyzing strategic knowledge.
- The study analyzes "forward discrepancy" (LLMs' performance on simpler sub-problems versus complex questions) and "backward discrepancy" (LLMs answering complex questions but struggling with simpler ones).
- The findings show that smaller models have more discrepancies than larger models, and guiding models through multi-turn interactions from simpler to complex questions improves performance across model sizes.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in language understanding and generation, but researchers still have a limited understanding of how these models utilize their knowledge to reason and solve complex problems. This paper proposes a novel approach to address this issue.
The researchers developed a method that breaks down complex real-world questions into a hierarchical graph structure. Each question is represented as a node, and the necessary background knowledge needed to solve the question is represented as parent nodes. This allows the researchers to assess how well LLMs can handle different levels of knowledge, from recalling basic concepts to applying more advanced problem-solving strategies.
Using this DepthQA dataset, the researchers analyzed two types of discrepancies in LLMs' performance. "Forward discrepancy" refers to when LLMs struggle with complex questions despite being able to handle simpler, related sub-problems. "Backward discrepancy" is when LLMs can answer complex questions but fail on the simpler ones.
The study found that smaller LLMs tend to have more of these discrepancies than larger models. However, an interesting finding was that guiding the models through a series of interactions from simpler to more complex questions can actually improve their overall problem-solving abilities, regardless of model size.
This research enhances our understanding of how LLMs utilize their knowledge and provides insights into ways to improve their reasoning and problem-solving skills, which is crucial for their real-world application.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to investigate how large language models (LLMs) utilize knowledge for reasoning. The researchers developed a method that deconstructs complex real-world questions into a hierarchical graph structure, where each question is represented as a node, and the necessary background knowledge needed to solve the question is represented as parent nodes.
Using this graph-based representation, the researchers created the DepthQA dataset, which categorizes questions into three levels of knowledge: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. This allows for a more nuanced evaluation of LLM performance on different aspects of reasoning.
The study then analyzes two types of discrepancies in LLMs' performance:
-
Forward discrepancy: This refers to the gap between LLMs' performance on simpler sub-problems versus their performance on the more complex, integrated questions. The researchers quantify this by comparing the models' scores on the simpler nodes versus the more complex parent nodes in the graph.
-
Backward discrepancy: This is the reverse of the forward discrepancy, where LLMs can answer the complex questions but struggle with the simpler ones. The researchers measure this by looking at the performance gap between the parent and child nodes in the graph.
The findings show that smaller LLMs tend to have more of these discrepancies than larger models, suggesting that model size plays a role in the ability to reason effectively. Interestingly, the researchers also found that guiding the models through multi-turn interactions from simpler to more complex questions can improve performance across all model sizes, highlighting the importance of structured intermediate steps in knowledge reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and insightful approach to evaluating LLM reasoning abilities by deconstructing complex questions into a hierarchical graph structure. This allows for a more nuanced assessment beyond just measuring overall accuracy, as it reveals discrepancies in how LLMs handle different levels of knowledge.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the DepthQA dataset. While the three levels of knowledge (conceptual, procedural, and strategic) provide a useful framework, there may be other important aspects of reasoning that are not captured. Additionally, the dataset is focused on a specific type of real-world question, and the findings may not necessarily generalize to all types of reasoning tasks.
Another area for further research could be investigating the mechanisms behind the performance improvements observed when guiding models from simpler to more complex questions. Understanding the underlying cognitive processes could lead to more effective training strategies and architectures for enhancing LLM reasoning abilities.
It would also be interesting to see how the DepthQA framework could be applied to other types of AI systems, such as knowledge-based reasoning or hybrid models that combine language understanding with other cognitive capabilities. This could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different approaches to artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) by deconstructing complex questions into a hierarchical graph structure. The researchers developed the DepthQA dataset to assess LLM performance on different levels of knowledge, from recalling conceptual information to applying strategic problem-solving skills.
The study's findings reveal discrepancies in how LLMs handle simpler versus more complex questions, with smaller models showing more significant gaps in performance. Interestingly, the researchers found that guiding the models through multi-turn interactions from simpler to more complex questions can improve their overall reasoning abilities, suggesting the importance of structured intermediate steps in knowledge reasoning.
This research enhances our understanding of how LLMs utilize their knowledge and provides insights into ways to improve their problem-solving skills, which is crucial for the real-world application of these powerful language models. The DepthQA framework also presents a valuable tool for the continued evaluation and development of AI systems that can reason and problem-solve at a high level.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Counter-intuitive: Large Language Models Can Better Understand Knowledge Graphs Than We Thought
Xinbang Dai, Yuncheng Hua, Tongtong Wu, Yang Sheng, Qiu Ji, Guilin Qi
0
0
As the parameter scale of large language models (LLMs) grows, jointly training knowledge graph (KG) embeddings with model parameters to enhance LLM capabilities becomes increasingly costly. Consequently, the community has shown interest in developing prompt strategies that effectively integrate KG information into LLMs. However, the format for incorporating KGs into LLMs lacks standardization; for instance, KGs can be transformed into linearized triples or natural language (NL) text. Current prompting methods often rely on a trial-and-error approach, leaving researchers with an incomplete understanding of which KG input format best facilitates LLM comprehension of KG content. To elucidate this, we design a series of experiments to explore LLMs' understanding of different KG input formats within the context of prompt engineering. Our analysis examines both literal and attention distribution levels. Through extensive experiments, we indicate a counter-intuitive phenomenon: when addressing fact-related questions, unordered linearized triples are more effective for LLMs' understanding of KGs compared to fluent NL text. Furthermore, noisy, incomplete, or marginally relevant subgraphs can still enhance LLM performance. Finally, different LLMs have distinct preferences for different formats of organizing unordered triples.
6/18/2024
Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
Philipp Mondorf, Barbara Plank
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown impressive performance on tasks involving reasoning, leading to a lively debate on whether these models possess reasoning capabilities similar to humans. However, despite these successes, the depth of LLMs' reasoning abilities remains uncertain. This uncertainty partly stems from the predominant focus on task performance, measured through shallow accuracy metrics, rather than a thorough investigation of the models' reasoning behavior. This paper seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive review of studies that go beyond task accuracy, offering deeper insights into the models' reasoning processes. Furthermore, we survey prevalent methodologies to evaluate the reasoning behavior of LLMs, emphasizing current trends and efforts towards more nuanced reasoning analyses. Our review suggests that LLMs tend to rely on surface-level patterns and correlations in their training data, rather than on genuine reasoning abilities. Additionally, we identify the need for further research that delineates the key differences between human and LLM-based reasoning. Through this survey, we aim to shed light on the complex reasoning processes within LLMs.
4/3/2024
🌀
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
6/13/2024
Reasoning on Efficient Knowledge Paths:Knowledge Graph Guides Large Language Model for Domain Question Answering
Yuqi Wang, Boran Jiang, Yi Luo, Dawei He, Peng Cheng, Liangcai Gao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs), such as GPT3.5, GPT4 and LLAMA2 perform surprisingly well and outperform human experts on many tasks. However, in many domain-specific evaluations, these LLMs often suffer from hallucination problems due to insufficient training of relevant corpus. Furthermore, fine-tuning large models may face problems such as the LLMs are not open source or the construction of high-quality domain instruction is difficult. Therefore, structured knowledge databases such as knowledge graph can better provide domain back- ground knowledge for LLMs and make full use of the reasoning and analysis capabilities of LLMs. In some previous works, LLM was called multiple times to determine whether the current triplet was suitable for inclusion in the subgraph when retrieving subgraphs through a question. Especially for the question that require a multi-hop reasoning path, frequent calls to LLM will consume a lot of computing power. Moreover, when choosing the reasoning path, LLM will be called once for each step, and if one of the steps is selected incorrectly, it will lead to the accumulation of errors in the following steps. In this paper, we integrated and optimized a pipeline for selecting reasoning paths from KG based on LLM, which can reduce the dependency on LLM. In addition, we propose a simple and effective subgraph retrieval method based on chain of thought (CoT) and page rank which can returns the paths most likely to contain the answer. We conduct experiments on three datasets: GenMedGPT-5k [14], WebQuestions [2], and CMCQA [21]. Finally, RoK can demonstrate that using fewer LLM calls can achieve the same results as previous SOTAs models.
4/17/2024