JailbreakZoo: Survey, Landscapes, and Horizons in Jailbreaking Large Language and Vision-Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a survey and analysis of "jailbreaking" techniques for large language and vision-language models
- Explores the landscape of jailbreaking attacks and defenses, as well as future directions for this area of research
- Aims to help researchers and practitioners better understand the security implications of these powerful models
Plain English Explanation
This paper focuses on the concept of "jailbreaking" large AI models, particularly language and vision-language models. Jailbreaking refers to techniques that allow these models to bypass their intended restrictions and behave in unintended ways.
The researchers survey the current state of jailbreaking techniques, looking at the various "landscapes" and "horizons" in this area of research. They examine different types of jailbreaking attacks, how they work, and the defenses that have been developed to try to prevent them.
The goal is to help the AI research community better understand the security implications of these powerful models and the ongoing "arms race" between jailbreakers and model defenders. By studying this landscape, the researchers hope to provide insights that can guide the development of more secure and robust AI systems in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on large language and vision-language models, and the security challenges they pose. It then dives into a detailed survey of jailbreaking techniques, categorizing them into different "landscapes" based on factors like the attack surface, the type of model being targeted, and the intended goal of the jailbreaker.
The researchers analyze a wide range of jailbreaking attacks, from prompt engineering to model inversion to multimodal attacks. They also examine the "horizons" of this field, looking at emerging trends and future directions, such as the potential for adversarial training to be used as a defense against jailbreaking.
Throughout the analysis, the paper highlights key insights and challenges, providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of jailbreaking research and its implications for the development of secure and trustworthy AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched survey of jailbreaking techniques, covering a wide range of attack vectors and defense strategies. However, the authors acknowledge that the field is rapidly evolving, and there may be additional jailbreaking methods or defenses that are not yet documented.
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on a relatively small set of large language and vision-language models. While these models are certainly important, the insights may not be directly applicable to other types of AI systems, such as reinforcement learning models or specialized domain-specific models.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of jailbreaking research. While the stated goal is to inform the development of more secure AI systems, there is a risk that the techniques described could be misused by bad actors to cause harm. The authors could have addressed this concern more explicitly.
Despite these minor issues, the paper is a valuable contribution to the field of AI security and provides a solid foundation for further research and development in this critical area.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive survey and analysis of the current state of jailbreaking research for large language and vision-language models. By exploring the various "landscapes" and "horizons" in this field, the researchers provide valuable insights that can guide the development of more secure and robust AI systems.
The findings have significant implications for the AI research community, as well as for broader discussions around the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies. By understanding the security challenges posed by these powerful models, researchers and practitioners can work towards building AI systems that are more trustworthy and aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
JailbreakZoo: Survey, Landscapes, and Horizons in Jailbreaking Large Language and Vision-Language Models
Haibo Jin, Leyang Hu, Xinuo Li, Peiyan Zhang, Chonghan Chen, Jun Zhuang, Haohan Wang
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) through developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) has brought significant advancements across various technological domains. While these models enhance capabilities in natural language processing and visual interactive tasks, their growing adoption raises critical concerns regarding security and ethical alignment. This survey provides an extensive review of the emerging field of jailbreaking--deliberately circumventing the ethical and operational boundaries of LLMs and VLMs--and the consequent development of defense mechanisms. Our study categorizes jailbreaks into seven distinct types and elaborates on defense strategies that address these vulnerabilities. Through this comprehensive examination, we identify research gaps and propose directions for future studies to enhance the security frameworks of LLMs and VLMs. Our findings underscore the necessity for a unified perspective that integrates both jailbreak strategies and defensive solutions to foster a robust, secure, and reliable environment for the next generation of language models. More details can be found on our website: url{https://chonghan-chen.com/llm-jailbreak-zoo-survey/}.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024
0
A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
Zihao Xu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Stjepan Picek
Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.
Read more5/20/2024
0
JailbreakLens: Visual Analysis of Jailbreak Attacks Against Large Language Models
Yingchaojie Feng, Zhizhang Chen, Zhining Kang, Sijia Wang, Minfeng Zhu, Wei Zhang, Wei Chen
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has underscored concerns regarding their security vulnerabilities, notably against jailbreak attacks, where adversaries design jailbreak prompts to circumvent safety mechanisms for potential misuse. Addressing these concerns necessitates a comprehensive analysis of jailbreak prompts to evaluate LLMs' defensive capabilities and identify potential weaknesses. However, the complexity of evaluating jailbreak performance and understanding prompt characteristics makes this analysis laborious. We collaborate with domain experts to characterize problems and propose an LLM-assisted framework to streamline the analysis process. It provides automatic jailbreak assessment to facilitate performance evaluation and support analysis of components and keywords in prompts. Based on the framework, we design JailbreakLens, a visual analysis system that enables users to explore the jailbreak performance against the target model, conduct multi-level analysis of prompt characteristics, and refine prompt instances to verify findings. Through a case study, technical evaluations, and expert interviews, we demonstrate our system's effectiveness in helping users evaluate model security and identify model weaknesses.
Read more4/16/2024